Jump to main content.


ECHO logo

Drinking Water Data - Serious Violator Report

This report counts public water systems that are current serious violators. A serious violator is defined as a public water system with unresolved serious, multiple, and/or continuing violations, as identified by the quarterly application of US EPA's Drinking Water Enforcement Response Policy, that must either return to compliance or be addressed by a formal enforcement action within six months.

US EPA designates serious violators so that the drinking water system and the primacy agency will act quickly to resolve the most significant drinking water violations. Many public water systems with violations, however, are not serious violators. Operators and the primacy agencies are expected to correct the violations at non-serious violators as well, but without the more strict requirements and deadlines applicable to serious violators. If the violations at a non-serious violator are left uncorrected, that system may become a serious violator. When a serious violator has returned to compliance, it is no longer designated a serious violator. US EPA updates its serious violator list on a quarterly basis.

 
State
Territory
Tribe
Number of Public Water Systems Number of Serious Violators Percent of Serious Violators   Number of Serious Violators Percent of Serious Violators 0 200 400 600 800 1000 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Alabama 611 10 1.6%    
Alaska 1,546 93 6.0%    
Arizona 1,564 99 6.3%    
Arkansas 1,106 18 1.6%    
California 7,770 571 7.3%    
Colorado 2,045 13 0.6%    
Connecticut 2,573 44 1.7%    
Delaware 492 11 2.2%    
Florida 5,580 84 1.5%    
Georgia 2,435 30 1.2%    
Hawaii 130 0 0.0%    
Idaho 1,955 71 3.6%    
Illinois 5,594 58 1.0%    
Indiana 4,183 103 2.5%    
Iowa 1,921 18 0.9%    
Kansas 1,022 44 4.3%    
Kentucky 462 22 4.8%    
Louisiana 1,400 34 2.4%    
Maine 1,868 50 2.7%    
Maryland 3,496 17 0.5%    
Massachusetts 1,796 18 1.0%    
Michigan 11,188 11 0.1%    
Minnesota 7,089 0 0.0%    
Mississippi (1) 1,261 914 72.5%    
Missouri 2,783 82 2.9%    
Montana 2,108 22 1.0%    
Nebraska 1,324 16 1.2%    
Nevada 563 28 5.0%    
New Hampshire 2,427 34 1.4%    
New Jersey 3,874 81 2.1%    
New Mexico 1,181 36 3.0%    
New York 8,926 66 0.7%    
North Carolina 6,058 4 0.1%    
North Dakota 555 6 1.1%    
Ohio 4,856 90 1.9%    
Oklahoma 1,668 36 2.2%    
Oregon 2,596 150 5.8%    
Pennsylvania 9,163 78 0.9%    
Rhode Island 484 5 1.0%    
South Carolina 1,435 3 0.2%    
South Dakota 647 13 2.0%    
Tennessee 894 7 0.8%    
Texas 6,961 380 5.5%    
Utah 1,012 55 5.4%    
Vermont 1,361 56 4.1%    
Virginia 2,771 55 2.0%    
Washington 4,347 56 1.3%    
West Virginia 1,038 77 7.4%    
Wisconsin 11,416 44 0.4%    
Wyoming 800 3 0.4%    
American Samoa 19 7 36.8%    
District of Columbia 6 0 0.0%    
Federated Territories of Micronesia 0 0
Guam 9 2 22.2%    
Marshall Islands 0 0
Northern Mariana Islands 76 9 11.8%    
Palau 0 0
Puerto Rico 495 180 36.4%    
Virgin Islands 306 18 5.9%    
EPA Region 1 Tribes 6 0 0.0%    
EPA Region 2 Tribes 8 1 12.5%    
EPA Region 3 Tribes 0 0
EPA Region 4 Tribes 32 1 3.1%    
EPA Region 5 Tribes 106 2 1.9%    
EPA Region 6 Tribes 84 8 9.5%    
EPA Region 7 Tribes 13 0 0.0%    
EPA Region 8 Tribes 132 6 4.5%    
EPA Region 9 Tribes 322 50 15.5%    
EPA Region 10 Tribes 122 6 4.9%    
Navajo Nation 163 60 36.8%    
0 200 400 600 800 1000 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
  1. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act Radionuclides Rule, all community water systems are responsible for monitoring for the presence of radioactive substances in their drinking water and reporting the results to the state. The State of Mississippi provides water testing services to all of its public water systems. Because Mississippi has to date supplied EPA with valid initial monitoring results for only a small number of its community water systems, almost all of the CWSs in the state have been in violation of the monitoring requirements of the Radionuclides Rule since early 2008.

Local Navigation


Jump to main content.