SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Alaska, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	149	149	149	149	149	149	149	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	149	149	149	149	149	149	149	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	145	145	145	145	145	145	145	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	145	145	145	145	145	145	145	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	163	163	163	163	163	163	163	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	163	163	163	163	163	163	163	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	7	19	45	52	63	70	73	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	7	19	45	52	63	70	73	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	118	118	118	118	118	118	118	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	118	118	118	118	118	118	118	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	29	29	29	29	29	29	29	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	29	29	29	29	29	29	29	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	99.2%	99.2%	99.2%	99.2%	99.2%	99.2%	99.2%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	84.2%	84.2%	84.2%	84.2%	84.2%	84.2%	84.2%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
		Data Quality	Combined	92.3%	92.3%	92.3%	92.3%	92.3%	92.3%	92.3%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	85	88	113	82	127	83	129
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	98	96	121	87	130	84	131
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	4	94	459	510	501	461	737
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	8	7	5	8	10	6
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	15	14	17	12	15	18	10
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	17	9	5	2	7	4	5
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	12	5	3	2	7	4	4
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	5	6	2	4	5	1	1
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	5	5	2	4	5	1	1
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	75.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	7	8	2	2	2	5	4
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	5	7	2	2	2	5	3
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$335,800	$60,280	$75,000	$101,907	$33,296	$51,939	$293,868
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	400.0%	300.0%	266.7%	100.0%	85.7%	100.0%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	100.0%	133.3%	75.0%	142.9%	63.6%	46.2%	60.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	1.7%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	2	4	2	2	2	0	2
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	80.0%	83.3%	0.0%	25.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	44.9%	48.2%	59.3%	49.1%	69.6%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0 / 0	0.0%	40.0%	50.0%	55.6%	83.3%	55.6%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	82.6%	100.0%	100.0%	99.2%	99.2%	91.0%	91.0%
		Goal	Combined	83.7%	100.0%	100.0%	99.3%	99.3%	91.0%	91.0%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	52.9%	83.5%	87.8%	89.2%	92.2%	88.7%	96.7%
		Review Indicator	Combined	54.2%	83.5%	88.5%	89.8%	92.8%	88.7%	96.7%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
		Review Indicator	Combined	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	36.9%	50.5%	63.1%	68.5%	83.8%	95.5%	95.5%
		Informational Only	Combined	37.8%	50.5%	63.1%	68.5%	83.8%	95.5%	95.5%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	30.5%	41.7%	64.1%	69.2%	79.3%	81.5%	94.0%
C		Informational Only	Combined	32.3%	42.3%	64.7%	69.8%	79.3%	81.5%	94.0%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	8.4%	17.8%	43.6%	49.1%	52.7%	57.3%	60.9%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	6	0	0	1	1	2	6
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	6	0	0	1	1	2	6
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.5%	44.9%	71.4%	73.5%	62.6%	57.1%	72.0%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	3.8%	3.2%	4.0%	5.2%	10.0%	3.4%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	2.7%	2.7%	1.3%	2.7%	3.4%	0.7%	0.7%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.7%	0.7%	0.0%	0.0%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.6%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	50.0%	100.0%	100.0%	50.0%	100.0%	0.0%	33.3%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	33.3%	33.3%	33.3%	50.0%	28.6%	100.0%	50.0%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	50.0%	33.3%	0.0%	50.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	55.6%	53.8%	63.6%	77.8%	75.0%	100.0%	83.3%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	7	8	2	2	2	5	4
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	40.0%	50.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.