SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Alabama, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	373	373	373	373	373	373	373	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	373	373	373	373	373	373	373	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	361	361	361	361	361	361	361	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	361	361	361	361	361	361	361	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	351	351	351	351	351	351	351	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	351	351	351	351	351	351	351	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	411	431	488	491	499	588	600	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	411	431	488	491	499	588	600	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	263	263	263	263	263	263	263	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	263	263	263	263	263	263	263	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	37	37	37	37	37	37	37	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	37	37	37	37	37	37	37	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	251	251	251	251	251	251	251	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	251	251	251	251	251	251	251	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
		Data Quality	Combined	99.6%	99.6%	99.6%	99.6%	99.6%	99.6%	99.6%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	460	477	542	562	570	596	604
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	550	568	613	629	625	638	627
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	1,685	1,749	1,713	1,480	1,141	1,410	1,513
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	78	100	69	94	85	70
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	110	116	107	77	101	92	77
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	81	78	68	50	64	45	33
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	69	68	60	45	59	42	33
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	56	68	59	47	63	28	13
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	49	61	55	44	55	26	13
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	93.1%	91.5%	92.1%	96.4%	92.3%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	98.3%	95.7%	100.0%	96.4%	92.3%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	100.0%	100.0%	98.4%	96.4%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	33	46	24	33	34	24	23
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	29	35	23	25	33	23	23
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$902,672	$965,100	$730,500	$389,750	$629,600	$302,000	$627,500
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	19	19	19	19	19	19	19	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	161.8%	106.4%	168.2%	102.4%	71.8%	66.7%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	104.1%	94.9%	98.1%	126.7%	87.5%	60.9%	51.6%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.3%	0.9%	0.5%	0.1%	1.4%	0.0%	0.3%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	12	13	1	5	1	9	5
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	100.0%	100.0%	88.1%	38.3%	46.0%	75.0%	53.8%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	68.3%	69.2%	91.5%	92.9%	97.1%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0 / 0	0.0%	93.0%	81.2%	91.5%	89.1%	92.0%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	98.7%	99.1%	99.1%	100.0%	100.0%	99.2%	99.2%
		Goal	Combined	98.7%	99.1%	99.1%	100.0%	100.0%	99.2%	99.2%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	86.6%	87.7%	93.7%	95.6%	96.3%	96.0%	97.7%
		Review Indicator	Combined	86.6%	87.7%	93.7%	95.6%	96.3%	96.0%	97.7%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	90.1%	95.6%	100.0%	75.0%	80.7%	87.2%	91.9%
		Review Indicator	Combined	90.6%	96.0%	100.0%	75.0%	80.7%	87.2%	91.9%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	60.8%	68.5%	81.4%	87.1%	91.4%	93.9%	95.7%
		Informational Only	Combined	61.1%	68.8%	81.4%	87.1%	91.4%	93.9%	95.7%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	78.0%	80.8%	83.9%	87.8%	90.9%	93.1%	95.1%
C		Informational Only	Combined	78.0%	80.8%	83.9%	87.8%	90.9%	93.1%	95.1%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	51.6%	52.5%	56.4%	56.0%	56.3%	64.3%	65.0%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	3	3	3	2	0	1	7
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	3	3	3	2	0	1	7
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	97.9%	97.4%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	7.2%	9.7%	4.6%	8.4%	7.1%	4.8%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	50.0%	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	100.0%	75.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	9.7%	11.3%	11.0%	7.5%	10.2%	5.6%	2.9%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.5%	0.0%	0.5%	0.5%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	1.7%	2.0%	1.7%	1.7%	1.4%	0.9%	0.6%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	92.6%	94.1%	100.0%	95.7%	82.4%	66.7%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	9.1%	7.0%	2.6%	33.3%	5.4%	33.3%	41.2%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	56.0%	81.2%	81.8%	40.0%	60.0%	100.0%	88.9%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	9.4%	7.9%	5.4%	6.1%	7.2%	10.1%	12.5%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	33	46	24	33	34	24	23
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	93.3%	100.0%	95.7%	96.3%	100.0%	100.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.