SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Arkansas, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	208	208	208	208	208	208	208	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	208	208	208	208	208	208	208	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	207	207	207	207	207	207	207	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	207	207	207	207	207	207	207	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	542	542	542	542	542	542	542	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	542	542	542	542	542	542	542	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	64	84	256	301	315	323	351	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	64	84	256	301	315	323	351	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	431	431	431	431	431	431	431	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	431	431	431	431	431	431	431	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	32	32	32	32	32	32	32	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	32	32	32	32	32	32	32	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	249	249	249	249	249	249	249	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	249	249	249	249	249	249	249	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	99.8%	99.8%	99.8%	99.8%	99.8%	99.8%	99.8%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
		Data Quality	Combined	99.6%	99.6%	99.6%	99.6%	99.6%	99.6%	99.6%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	337	372	443	450	489	529	573
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	460	486	537	518	548	586	624
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	2	0	1	5
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	171	147	152	148	162	168
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	204	208	148	154	150	163	169
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	70	71	48	29	77	34	109
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	64	68	45	27	77	34	106
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	24	20	8	11	24	12	43
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	23	16	8	11	24	12	42
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	9.1%	45.8%	75.0%	83.7%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	0.0%	100.0%	100.0%	81.8%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	50.0%	0.0%	75.0%	72.7%	100.0%	100.0%	95.3%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	82	68	42	20	25	75	53
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	78	65	40	19	25	73	53
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$213,700	$460,594	$119,530	$92,340	$235,141	$445,349	$545,970
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	36.8%	24.4%	17.5%	50.0%	35.3%	38.2%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	38.7%	30.0%	23.8%	17.1%	48.8%	35.3%	38.2%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.4%	0.0%	4.7%	0.9%	0.0%	0.2%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	5	7	2	3	20	14	13
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	91.7%	85.0%	37.5%	18.2%	8.3%	8.3%	23.3%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	37.9%	19.5%	50.8%	69.8%	66.0%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	20.5%	46.3%	20.7%	65.6%	32.9%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	93.6%	99.4%	99.4%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
		Goal	Combined	93.6%	99.4%	99.4%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	82.1%	86.4%	89.5%	89.3%	93.4%	96.0%	98.2%
		Review Indicator	Combined	82.5%	86.8%	89.5%	89.3%	93.4%	96.0%	98.2%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	97.6%	99.3%	100.0%	83.1%	93.4%	100.0%	100.0%
		Review Indicator	Combined	97.6%	99.3%	100.0%	83.1%	93.4%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	44.6%	49.3%	58.3%	63.0%	70.8%	78.6%	91.3%
		Informational Only	Combined	44.6%	49.3%	58.3%	63.0%	70.8%	78.6%	91.3%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	63.0%	62.1%	66.6%	70.4%	76.4%	82.4%	92.7%
C		Informational Only	Combined	63.0%	62.1%	66.6%	70.4%	76.4%	82.4%	92.7%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	62.3%	50.1%	62.5%	71.7%	74.7%	76.1%	80.3%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	5	11	1	1	0	0	0
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	5	11	1	1	0	0	0
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	92.3%	97.7%	97.3%	95.3%	98.6%	94.4%	85.5%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	27.5%	20.9%	21.3%	19.4%	18.5%	17.5%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	57.1%	40.0%	66.7%	50.0%	33.3%	66.7%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	7.2%	5.3%	1.4%	4.8%	8.7%	5.3%	9.1%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.7%	0.2%	0.4%	0.2%	0.6%	0.0%	3.9%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	54.8%	51.5%	47.1%	30.8%	30.8%	43.3%	45.5%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	40.0%	55.9%	66.7%	73.3%	45.5%	78.9%	43.8%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	50.0%	25.0%	28.6%	20.0%	70.0%	53.3%	33.3%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	7.4%	11.8%	18.4%	42.1%	60.0%	64.3%	42.6%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	82	68	42	20	25	75	53
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	76.2%	100.0%	81.8%	66.7%	100.0%	100.0%	90.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.