SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Arizona , State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	137	137	137	137	137	137	137	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	137	137	137	137	137	137	137	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	130	130	130	130	130	130	130	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	130	130	130	130	130	130	130	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	112	112	112	112	112	112	112	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	112	112	112	112	112	112	112	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	36	36	36	36	36	36	36	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	36	36	36	36	36	36	36	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	56	59	60	52	44	23	29	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	56	59	60	52	44	23	29	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	109	109	109	109	109	109	109	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	109	109	109	109	109	109	109	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	47	47	47	47	47	47	47	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	47	47	47	47	47	47	47	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	55	55	55	55	55	55	55	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	55	55	55	55	55	55	55	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	81.3%	81.3%	81.3%	81.3%	81.3%	81.3%	81.3%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	78.8%	78.8%	78.8%	78.8%	78.8%	78.8%	78.8%
		Data Quality	Combined	75.0%	75.0%	75.0%	75.0%	75.0%	75.0%	75.0%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	64	72	83	86	66	96	80
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	71	77	93	101	69	106	83
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	115	106	115	110	62	119	120
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	3	5	10	12	10	19
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	12	19	19	21	22	21	30
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	57	27	51	32	15	10	7
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	15	17	14	9	10	6	5
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	15	12	17	10	12	9	5
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	14	12	16	9	12	9	5
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	64.7%	70.0%	100.0%	88.9%	80.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	94.1%	90.0%	83.3%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	94.1%	90.0%	91.7%	100.0%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	9	8	15	11	12	10	4
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	8	8	13	10	11	9	4
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$169,475	$434,924	$992,841	$539,162	$3,073,704	$65,773	$1,051,648
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	1300.0%	333.3%	233.3%	350.0%	300.0%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	0 / 0	1500.0%	750.0%	300.0%	175.0%	233.3%	150.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	1.4%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	7	8	0	2	2	1	1
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	100.0%	100.0%	76.5%	30.0%	66.7%	77.8%	80.0%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	32.0%	59.8%	48.4%	57.8%	48.0%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	34.1%	16.3%	73.1%	80.0%	54.5%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	97.9%	92.0%	92.0%	89.7%	89.7%	81.7%	81.7%
		Goal	Combined	96.1%	91.1%	91.1%	82.0%	82.0%	78.5%	78.5%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	71.7%	68.3%	70.9%	70.7%	75.7%	68.8%	62.6%
		Review Indicator	Combined	80.1%	75.4%	81.6%	73.6%	80.0%	74.5%	66.9%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	37.1%	42.9%	86.5%	94.6%
		Review Indicator	Combined	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	40.0%	45.7%	86.5%	94.6%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	79.5%	84.6%	84.6%	89.7%	76.9%	89.7%	89.7%
		Informational Only	Combined	79.5%	84.6%	84.6%	89.7%	76.9%	89.7%	89.7%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	49.6%	53.2%	53.6%	58.7%	49.6%	63.9%	73.0%
C		Informational Only	Combined	49.6%	53.2%	54.0%	59.1%	50.0%	63.9%	73.0%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	37.7%	39.5%	36.3%	32.7%	21.2%	7.2%	0.0%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	15	24	1	8	12	9	19
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	24	28	3	8	21	18	26
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	6	6	10	13	13	8
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	70.7%	42.0%	46.2%	45.6%	37.1%	36.5%	35.7%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.0%	1.7%	3.7%	4.7%	2.9%	3.5%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	50.0%	100.0%	0.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	5.8%	5.1%	6.6%	4.4%	4.4%	2.9%	2.2%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.7%	0.7%	1.5%	0.0%	0.7%	0.0%	0.0%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	1.8%	2.7%	2.7%	2.7%	4.5%	2.7%	1.8%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	2.7%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	100.0%	85.7%	80.0%	100.0%	100.0%	50.0%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	37.5%	9.1%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	40.0%	60.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	30.0%	38.2%	31.6%	17.2%	9.1%	4.8%	6.7%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	8	5	15	11	11	9	4
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	57.1%	80.0%	92.3%	88.9%	80.0%	77.8%	100.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.