SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for California , State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	1,161	1,161	1,161	1,161	1,161	1,161	1,161	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	1,161	1,161	1,161	1,161	1,161	1,161	1,161	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	1,073	1,073	1,073	1,073	1,073	1,073	1,073	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	1,073	1,073	1,073	1,073	1,073	1,073	1,073	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	305	305	305	305	305	305	305	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	305	305	305	305	305	305	305	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	119	119	119	119	119	119	119	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	119	119	119	119	119	119	119	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	223	259	305	303	303	298	241	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	223	259	305	303	303	298	241	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	239	239	239	239	239	239	239	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	239	239	239	239	239	239	239	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	180	180	180	180	180	180	180	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	180	180	180	180	180	180	180	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	198	198	198	198	198	198	198	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	198	198	198	198	198	198	198	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	47.3%	47.3%	47.3%	47.3%	47.3%	47.3%	47.3%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	16.7%	16.7%	16.7%	16.7%	16.7%	16.7%	16.7%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	88.2%	88.2%	88.2%	88.2%	88.2%	88.2%	88.2%
		Data Quality	Combined	64.2%	64.2%	64.2%	64.2%	64.2%	64.2%	64.2%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	678	886	900	1,077	986	1,015	957
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	1,052	1,099	1,169	1,293	1,177	1,091	1,000
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	1,363	2,347	2,177	2,408	2,147	2,082	2,197
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	4	19	19	29	36	44
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	17	20	41	47	57	72	81
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	706	333	379	560	752	493	198
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	268	223	202	216	251	222	128
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	490	328	378	645	719	810	478
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	258	217	255	317	286	344	239
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	0.0%	1.1%	16.4%	5.3%	1.9%	3.8%	8.6%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	52.3%	100.0%	87.6%	72.4%	83.6%	80.4%	92.3%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	16.9%	40.0%	55.8%	66.0%	82.5%	80.2%	97.3%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	617	460	348	352	561	594	294
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	259	247	227	209	228	268	167
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$5,453,912	$13,989,056	$7,245,387	$16,189,075	$10,382,481	$5,836,230	$6,524,661
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	8066.7%	1462.5%	1466.7%	995.8%	896.7%	491.7%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	4014.3%	2788.9%	888.9%	725.8%	630.8%	532.7%	303.3%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.1%	0.0%	0.0%	0.1%	0.2%	0.3%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	81	102	216	89	72	69	71
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	86.7%	72.6%	14.3%	5.7%	4.9%	7.3%	10.5%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	25.5%	36.8%	34.5%	31.4%	40.4%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	7.6%	15.2%	18.7%	27.5%	47.8%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	90.0%	94.9%	94.9%	96.3%	96.3%	89.8%	89.8%
		Goal	Combined	90.0%	94.9%	94.9%	96.4%	96.4%	89.9%	89.9%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	75.1%	78.5%	84.6%	86.1%	87.7%	83.6%	88.3%
		Review Indicator	Combined	75.3%	78.6%	84.7%	86.2%	87.8%	83.9%	88.4%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	60.8%	73.3%	100.0%	44.7%	59.7%	61.2%	61.9%
		Review Indicator	Combined	60.8%	73.3%	100.0%	44.7%	59.7%	61.2%	61.9%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	56.3%	71.1%	98.5%	98.5%	98.5%	91.9%	83.1%
		Informational Only	Combined	56.3%	71.1%	98.5%	98.5%	98.5%	91.9%	83.1%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	83.9%	88.0%	89.9%	90.5%	91.1%	88.5%	85.0%
C		Informational Only	Combined	83.9%	88.0%	90.3%	90.9%	91.4%	89.5%	85.9%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	29.6%	31.2%	31.7%	32.3%	32.6%	28.6%	24.4%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	300	178	161	154	83	108	63
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	300	178	161	155	84	109	64
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	93	360	683	805	803	807	540
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	96.6%	95.1%	83.1%	89.1%	82.6%	82.2%	79.0%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.3%	1.6%	1.4%	2.4%	3.1%	4.1%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.0%	5.5%	6.7%	5.7%	10.5%	13.6%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	17.7%	14.4%	17.4%	22.8%	21.6%	27.4%	19.9%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.9%	0.8%	0.8%	0.4%	0.4%	1.0%	0.5%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	3.6%	2.3%	3.3%	5.6%	2.0%	3.3%	0.3%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	1.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.7%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	98.5%	98.4%	98.4%	96.6%	97.3%	95.1%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	8.7%	10.6%	9.0%	15.4%	21.4%	11.2%	9.6%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	55.2%	65.6%	67.0%	59.5%	45.9%	40.9%	50.9%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	37.6%	38.4%	32.3%	23.3%	19.9%	16.4%	15.1%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	617	460	347	352	561	594	294
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	96.1%	96.3%	95.1%	88.8%	91.5%	91.5%	95.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.