SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Connecticut, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	83	83	83	83	83	83	83	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	83	83	83	83	83	83	83	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	83	83	83	83	83	83	83	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	83	83	83	83	83	83	83	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	251	251	251	251	251	251	251	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	251	251	251	251	251	251	251	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	206	311	366	419	428	439	376	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	206	311	366	419	428	439	376	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	83	83	83	83	83	83	83	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	83	83	83	83	83	83	83	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	18	18	18	18	18	18	18	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	18	18	18	18	18	18	18	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	83	83	83	83	83	83	83	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	83	83	83	83	83	83	83	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	89.7%	89.7%	89.7%	89.7%	89.7%	89.7%	89.7%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	66.7%	66.7%	66.7%	66.7%	66.7%	66.7%	66.7%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	97.8%	97.8%	97.8%	97.8%	97.8%	97.8%	97.8%
		Data Quality	Combined	93.5%	93.5%	93.5%	93.5%	93.5%	93.5%	93.5%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	109	114	125	83	85	92	99
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	112	118	127	84	91	95	99
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	1	22	12	8	5	12
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	49	58	61	81	93	93
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	57	57	66	70	90	103	103
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	84	129	113	69	89	46	61
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	76	104	94	53	60	37	43
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	4	6	24	40	25	10	18
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	4	6	23	39	25	10	17
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	96.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	96.0%	90.0%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	15	22	18	10	24	20	14
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	15	14	15	10	21	19	13
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$264,527	$217,190	$103,420	$46,317	$122,205	$181,504	$454,769
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	70.0%	63.6%	81.8%	73.7%	54.5%	75.0%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	53.8%	58.3%	61.5%	76.9%	71.4%	52.0%	65.2%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.6%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	7	3	1	2	1	3	1
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	100.0%	50.0%	0.0%	0.0%	12.0%	0.0%	11.1%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	21.7%	35.0%	23.2%	43.8%	22.6%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	50.0%	72.9%	54.2%	51.0%	48.5%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	97.1%	98.6%	98.6%	98.7%	98.7%	98.8%	98.8%
		Goal	Combined	97.1%	98.6%	98.6%	98.7%	98.7%	98.8%	98.8%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	85.4%	88.2%	88.2%	94.0%	95.2%	95.2%	98.8%
		Review Indicator	Combined	85.4%	88.2%	88.2%	94.0%	95.2%	95.2%	98.8%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	68.4%	83.8%	92.5%	17.3%	32.1%	52.4%	75.1%
		Review Indicator	Combined	68.8%	84.2%	93.0%	17.3%	33.3%	52.8%	75.1%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	65.6%	80.7%	89.6%	96.0%	98.8%	99.2%	98.8%
		Informational Only	Combined	66.0%	81.5%	90.4%	96.8%	99.6%	99.6%	98.8%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	65.7%	80.0%	89.5%	95.3%	98.1%	97.7%	97.3%
C		Informational Only	Combined	66.1%	81.2%	90.6%	96.5%	98.8%	98.8%	98.0%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	9.2%	12.8%	14.6%	16.5%	16.6%	17.0%	14.2%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	14	12	4	4	9	5	3
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	14	12	4	4	9	5	3
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	43.4%	50.0%	69.5%	98.8%	98.8%	100.0%	100.0%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	9.3%	11.9%	17.2%	25.6%	32.3%	30.5%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	14.3%	100.0%	0.0%	50.0%	100.0%	100.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	3.6%	4.8%	4.8%	14.5%	13.3%	4.8%	12.0%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	1.2%	2.4%	1.2%	1.2%	1.2%	0.0%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.0%	3.6%	5.2%	2.8%	1.6%	1.2%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.4%	0.4%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	75.0%	42.9%	50.0%	0.0%	80.0%	100.0%	75.0%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	78.6%	73.1%	40.0%	20.0%	43.8%	70.0%	31.2%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	25.0%	28.6%	25.0%	66.7%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	87.5%	75.0%	62.9%	74.4%	75.0%	81.0%	67.5%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	13	19	15	8	20	18	13
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	20.0%	100.0%	100.0%	85.7%	100.0%	80.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.