SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Delaware, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	61	61	61	61	61	61	61	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	61	61	61	61	61	61	61	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	61	61	61	61	61	61	61	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	61	61	61	61	61	61	61	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	86	86	86	86	86	86	86	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	86	86	86	86	86	86	86	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	111	119	126	129	128	127	118	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	111	119	126	129	128	127	118	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	52	52	52	52	52	52	52	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	52	52	52	52	52	52	52	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	75.0%	75.0%	75.0%	75.0%	75.0%	75.0%	75.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
		Data Quality	Combined	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	96	82	92	96	87	77	70
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	111	90	100	103	92	77	71
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	327	321	342	276	214	199	183
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	38	54	53	53	36	58
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	38	50	59	55	55	38	59
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	51	36	34	45	27	16	22
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	39	23	29	34	21	11	21
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	14	5	4	9	9	8	5
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	8	5	3	9	4	3	5
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	25	13	19	13	15	4	7
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	16	13	15	10	14	3	6
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$756,769	$481,665	$558,840	$633,550	$1,047,500	$104,074	$1,987,675
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	35.7%	28.6%	33.3%	32.0%	21.7%	26.9%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	57.1%	31.2%	28.6%	33.3%	36.0%	25.0%	26.9%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	6.7%	2.0%	2.2%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	8	6	2	10	7	8	8
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	100.0%	60.0%	25.0%	44.4%	33.3%	50.0%	20.0%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	84.9%	77.4%	37.2%	58.7%	67.1%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	88.0%	76.1%	62.5%	87.5%	88.9%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	93.1%	93.1%
		Goal	Combined	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	93.1%	93.1%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	94.2%	95.5%	95.3%	96.9%	93.8%	90.5%	88.7%
		Review Indicator	Combined	94.2%	95.5%	95.3%	96.9%	93.8%	90.5%	90.3%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	76.6%	95.7%	95.9%	100.0%
		Review Indicator	Combined	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	76.6%	95.7%	95.9%	100.0%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	75.0%	77.5%	81.2%	83.8%	87.5%	92.5%	97.5%
		Informational Only	Combined	75.0%	77.5%	81.2%	83.8%	87.5%	92.5%	97.5%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	78.1%	79.2%	82.3%	87.5%	93.8%	96.9%	98.9%
C		Informational Only	Combined	78.1%	79.2%	82.3%	87.5%	93.8%	96.9%	98.9%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	77.8%	81.0%	84.1%	85.6%	85.6%	84.5%	78.9%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	7	9	4	4	0	3	2
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	7	9	4	4	0	3	2
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	83.1%	87.7%	92.2%	86.2%	98.4%	91.8%	88.1%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	23.8%	32.5%	33.0%	40.4%	33.0%	50.0%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	50.0%	33.3%	60.0%	100.0%	50.0%	60.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	8.2%	3.3%	4.9%	9.8%	6.6%	4.9%	6.6%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	3.3%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	1.2%	3.5%	0.0%	2.3%	0.0%	0.0%	1.2%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	1.2%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	71.4%	60.0%	62.5%	60.0%	37.5%	33.3%	50.0%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	58.3%	80.0%	66.7%	60.0%	60.0%	40.0%	50.0%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	85.7%	83.3%	66.7%	60.0%	75.0%	66.7%	16.7%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	71.4%	80.8%	90.9%	71.4%	73.9%	77.8%	93.8%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	25	13	19	11	15	4	7
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	83.3%	66.7%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	50.0%	100.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.