SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Florida, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	400	400	400	400	400	400	400	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	400	400	400	400	400	400	400	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	399	399	399	399	399	399	399	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	399	399	399	399	399	399	399	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	537	537	537	537	537	537	537	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	537	537	537	537	537	537	537	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	564	589	617	718	1,038	1,213	2,055	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	564	589	617	718	1,038	1,213	2,055	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	363	363	363	363	363	363	363	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	363	363	363	363	363	363	363	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	199	199	199	199	199	199	199	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	199	199	199	199	199	199	199	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	87.6%	87.6%	87.6%	87.6%	87.6%	87.6%	87.6%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	54.5%	54.5%	54.5%	54.5%	54.5%	54.5%	54.5%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	93.8%	93.8%	93.8%	93.8%	93.8%	93.8%	93.8%
		Data Quality	Combined	93.8%	93.8%	93.8%	93.8%	93.8%	93.8%	93.8%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	417	460	529	536	564	566	579
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	526	566	642	643	645	623	618
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	1,698	1,838	1,897	1,945	2,019	2,047	2,773
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	120	125	159	162	248	259
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	127	125	129	162	166	252	263
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	31	41	32	38	42	33	33
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	30	37	30	37	33	25	31
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	41	46	39	54	59	44	41
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	34	43	35	49	50	38	36
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	33	34	47	34	42	36	38
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	32	31	44	33	37	34	38
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$333,443	$1,347,675	$1,649,071	$405,948	$324,585	$933,704	$402,675
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	1633.3%	600.0%	124.4%	129.5%	109.5%	86.3%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	685.7%	980.0%	540.0%	124.4%	126.7%	107.0%	86.5%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	21	12	7	15	17	27	13
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	97.6%	93.5%	71.8%	40.7%	52.5%	50.0%	51.2%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	34.8%	42.9%	40.7%	26.0%	55.5%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0 / 0	0.0%	72.2%	70.8%	73.8%	67.2%	66.2%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	99.7%	98.7%	98.7%	99.3%	99.3%	99.5%	99.5%
		Goal	Combined	99.7%	98.7%	98.7%	99.5%	99.5%	99.5%	99.5%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	88.7%	92.6%	91.1%	97.1%	98.4%	98.4%	97.8%
		Review Indicator	Combined	88.7%	92.6%	91.1%	97.3%	98.4%	98.6%	97.8%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	91.3%	96.5%	99.6%	64.2%	77.7%	88.1%	96.6%
		Review Indicator	Combined	91.3%	96.5%	99.6%	64.2%	77.7%	88.1%	96.6%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	58.6%	69.1%	77.4%	82.1%	85.2%	92.9%	98.4%
		Informational Only	Combined	58.6%	69.1%	77.4%	82.1%	85.2%	92.9%	98.4%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	79.1%	83.0%	84.9%	86.1%	87.7%	94.6%	99.2%
C		Informational Only	Combined	79.1%	83.0%	84.9%	86.1%	87.7%	94.6%	99.2%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	20.7%	21.3%	21.7%	23.8%	31.6%	35.5%	56.9%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	75	155	28	81	7	29	50
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	75	155	28	81	7	29	50
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	3	3	3	3	3	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.7%	1.4%	6.1%	6.8%	8.1%	9.6%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.0%	16.7%	58.3%	50.0%	45.0%	40.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	5.8%	8.0%	7.5%	11.0%	12.0%	8.8%	8.0%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.2%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.6%	0.6%	0.4%	0.6%	0.4%	0.4%	0.4%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.2%	0.2%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	93.1%	100.0%	100.0%	96.2%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	4.0%	2.9%	3.7%	5.6%	10.0%	8.7%	3.4%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	54.5%	73.9%	87.5%	81.2%	68.2%	70.0%	68.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	39.0%	38.4%	34.3%	33.3%	28.8%	35.4%	38.0%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	33	34	47	34	42	35	38
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	93.5%	90.9%	86.7%	88.9%	100.0%	100.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.