Jump to main content.


State Review Framework - CAA Data for Georgia, State Multi-Year Report

Help Page
Metric Metric Type Agency 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
ATitle V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)Data QualityState405405405405405405405n/a
Combined405405405405405405405n/a
Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)Data QualityState388388388388388388388n/a
Combined388388388388388388388n/a
BSource Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)Data QualityState1,2641,2641,2641,2641,2641,2641,264n/a
Combined1,2641,2641,2641,2641,2641,2641,264n/a
Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)Data QualityState30303030303030n/a
Combined30303030303030n/a
Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)Informational OnlyState3546779097109111n/a
Combined3546779097109111n/a
CCAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)Data QualityState657657657657657657657n/a
Combined657657657657657657657n/a
CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)Data QualityState76767676767676n/a
Combined76767676767676n/a
CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)Data QualityState270270270270270270270n/a
Combined270270270270270270270n/a
CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005Data QualityState79.3%79.3%79.3%79.3%79.3%79.3%79.3%
CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005Data QualityState47.5%47.5%47.5%47.5%47.5%47.5%47.5%
CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005Data QualityState98.3%98.3%98.3%98.3%98.3%98.3%98.3%
Combined98.3%98.3%98.3%98.3%98.3%98.3%98.3%
DCompliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)Data QualityState534604629602604610596
Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)Data QualityState626710772677667643618
Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)Informational OnlyState141451,9292,1847568282,069
EHistorical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)Data QualityState0177221216208202157
Combined202221247241232228184
FInformal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)Data QualityState851078981817439
Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)Data QualityState78926578737238
GHPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)Data QualityState44323444363621
HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)Data QualityState39312841303021
HHPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discoveryData QualityState0 / 00 / 044.1%52.3%58.3%97.2%90.5%
HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZsData QualityState0 / 00 / 0100.0%100.0%97.2%100.0%95.2%
HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)Data QualityState0 / 00 / 0100.0%100.0%97.2%100.0%95.2%
IFormal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)Data QualityState40464746465025
Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)Data QualityState38433744453925
JAssessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)Data QualityState$204,989$555,695$391,293$445,213$345,587$673,410$1,298,912
KMajor Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)Review IndicatorState36363636363636n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
ANumber of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)Data QualityState0 / 080.4%59.4%55.2%46.3%42.6%50.0%
Combined57.1%53.9%46.9%46.3%37.8%33.3%33.3%
BStack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)GoalState1.0%1.9%47.3%3.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)Data QualityState31463428441811
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
APercent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)GoalState100.0%100.0%58.8%34.1%27.8%16.7%47.6%
BPercent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)GoalState0.0%0.0%45.3%41.8%50.3%49.7%47.0%
Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)GoalState0 / 00.0%37.8%46.8%45.5%39.0%7.9%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
ACMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)GoalState99.7%99.4%99.4%99.7%99.7%100.0%100.0%
Combined99.7%99.4%99.4%99.7%99.7%100.0%100.0%
CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)Review IndicatorState86.3%87.8%89.7%90.2%91.1%92.6%91.9%
Combined86.3%87.8%89.7%90.3%91.1%92.6%91.9%
BCAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) 1Review IndicatorState84.5%93.5%99.1%45.4%74.7%97.6%99.9%
Combined84.5%93.5%99.1%45.5%74.7%97.6%99.9%
CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)Informational OnlyState59.8%72.4%80.5%85.9%89.1%92.3%96.9%
Combined59.8%72.4%80.5%85.9%89.1%92.3%96.9%
CCAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY) Informational OnlyState53.0%54.0%55.5%57.6%59.1%60.8%63.1%
Combined53.0%54.0%55.5%57.7%59.1%60.8%63.1%
DCAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)Informational OnlyState4.3%3.1%2.6%2.7%2.7%3.3%3.4%
ENumber of Sources with Unknown Compliance StatusReview IndicatorState1599756
Combined1599756
FCAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)Informational OnlyState0000000
GReview of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)GoalState89.0%98.8%99.5%99.8%100.0%100.0%95.2%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
CPercent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY) Review IndicatorState0.0%13.6%17.2%18.0%17.4%17.6%13.2%
Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)Review IndicatorState0.0%48.3%64.7%66.7%57.9%36.4%55.6%
EPA0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
AHigh Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)Review IndicatorState7.7%5.2%5.2%7.7%5.9%5.2%3.5%
EPA0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
BHigh Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)Review IndicatorState0.2%0.5%0.2%0.6%0.2%0.3%0.4%
EPA0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CPercent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)Review IndicatorState63.6%63.0%80.0%72.7%57.7%76.2%53.8%
DPercent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)Review IndicatorState41.8%40.0%27.8%33.3%51.3%50.0%42.9%
EPercentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)Review IndicatorState36.1%39.5%47.4%60.9%61.5%60.0%43.8%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
APercent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)Review IndicatorState23.7%32.3%36.8%40.2%41.8%43.9%44.6%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
ANo Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)Review IndicatorState40464746465025
BPercent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)Review IndicatorState100.0%95.5%100.0%95.5%100.0%90.0%100.0%
Download a comma delimited text file Download an excel file Report Generated on 6/30/2011   
Data Refresh Dates   

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.


Caveats:
0EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI

1 The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.

Jump to main content.