SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Iowa, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	266	266	266	266	266	266	266	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	266	266	266	266	266	266	266	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	244	244	244	244	244	244	244	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	244	244	244	244	244	244	244	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	1,849	1,849	1,849	1,849	1,849	1,849	1,849	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	1,849	1,849	1,849	1,849	1,849	1,849	1,849	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	614	764	854	837	797	739	699	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	614	764	854	837	797	739	699	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	499	499	499	499	499	499	499	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	499	499	499	499	499	499	499	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	26	26	26	26	26	26	26	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	26	26	26	26	26	26	26	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	608	608	608	608	608	608	608	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	608	608	608	608	608	608	608	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	90.4%	90.4%	90.4%	90.4%	90.4%	90.4%	90.4%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	14.3%	14.3%	14.3%	14.3%	14.3%	14.3%	14.3%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	97.1%	97.1%	97.1%	97.1%	97.1%	97.1%	97.1%
		Data Quality	Combined	96.0%	96.0%	96.0%	96.0%	96.0%	96.0%	96.0%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	464	577	527	474	484	520	565
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	565	800	689	557	536	576	604
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	157	275	848	1,510	1,521	1,574	1,471
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	149	220	210	226	232	246
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	284	286	254	235	253	260	272
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	298	298	311	308	261	267	233
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	252	247	253	241	209	204	205
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	16	17	16	18	17	12	3
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	13	15	16	18	16	12	3
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	33.3%	93.8%	94.4%	100.0%	91.7%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	100.0%	100.0%	94.4%	94.1%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	66.7%	100.0%	94.4%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	24	17	28	26	21	27	21
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	21	8	16	18	14	15	15
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$55,000	$64,800	$69,750	$42,935	$105,500	$57,900	$28,500
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	44.7%	31.9%	31.1%	27.6%	25.0%	11.6%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	23.0%	27.7%	31.0%	30.2%	28.3%	25.0%	11.1%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	2.6%	0.0%	0.3%	0.0%	0.0%	1.1%	0.5%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	52	54	65	81	86	58	31
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	100.0%	82.4%	43.8%	33.3%	23.5%	25.0%	0.0%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	70.0%	71.3%	63.3%	57.1%	53.4%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	76.9%	84.1%	86.7%	91.3%	85.0%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	87.7%	87.0%	87.0%	96.4%	96.4%	91.9%	91.9%
		Goal	Combined	89.1%	95.8%	95.8%	98.4%	98.4%	96.5%	96.5%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	80.1%	79.9%	83.4%	90.7%	89.3%	89.9%	93.2%
		Review Indicator	Combined	82.4%	87.5%	89.3%	92.8%	92.9%	94.2%	97.8%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	87.0%	93.9%	98.1%	44.0%	72.9%	83.0%	91.2%
		Review Indicator	Combined	89.6%	95.5%	99.0%	44.6%	73.9%	84.4%	93.1%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	67.4%	78.3%	83.9%	85.6%	87.0%	88.8%	89.8%
		Informational Only	Combined	69.7%	79.8%	84.9%	87.0%	87.8%	89.8%	91.3%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	45.8%	53.6%	57.3%	58.4%	58.9%	59.2%	59.4%
C		Informational Only	Combined	46.7%	54.2%	57.9%	59.0%	59.0%	59.4%	59.8%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	25.5%	31.2%	35.2%	35.6%	34.4%	32.3%	31.0%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	72	76	21	10	4	7	8
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	72	76	21	10	4	7	8
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	1	1	1	0	0	0	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	72.0%	97.3%	100.0%	100.0%	99.6%	100.0%	100.0%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	11.7%	21.2%	21.4%	23.9%	23.1%	22.2%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	76.0%	76.5%	68.2%	86.7%	80.0%	87.5%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	3.0%	3.4%	5.6%	6.0%	5.6%	4.5%	1.1%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.8%	0.0%	0.0%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.2%	0.3%	0.1%	0.1%	0.1%	0.0%	0.0%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	75.0%	100.0%	88.9%	88.9%	71.4%	77.8%	27.3%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	84.7%	79.4%	78.2%	78.8%	75.4%	85.5%	88.7%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	29.7%	34.2%	43.2%	45.2%	31.1%	17.8%	12.5%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	32.4%	45.0%	57.5%	61.5%	60.6%	64.0%	84.2%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	22	16	25	23	19	27	20
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	55.6%	100.0%	88.9%	50.0%	100.0%	100.0%	20.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.