SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Idaho, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	53	53	53	53	53	53	53	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	57	57	57	57	57	57	57	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	50	50	50	50	50	50	50	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	54	54	54	54	54	54	54	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	205	205	205	205	205	205	205	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	206	206	206	206	206	206	206	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	13	13	13	13	13	13	13	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	13	13	13	13	13	13	13	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	92	117	143	152	163	174	180	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	92	117	144	153	164	175	181	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	159	159	159	159	159	159	159	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	162	162	162	162	162	162	162	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	23	23	23	23	23	23	23	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	26	26	26	26	26	26	26	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	48	48	48	48	48	48	48	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	50	50	50	50	50	50	50	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
		Data Quality	Combined	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	39	26	43	40	35	34	37
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	40	30	46	43	37	38	39
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	104	120	105	124	102	115	109
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	1	17	15	6	10	22	43
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	110	47	37	14	16	28	49
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	12	16	22	13	11	32	37
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	12	16	22	13	11	31	37
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	6	5	3	7	1	3	3
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	5	4	3	5	1	3	3
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	50.0%	100.0%	100.0%	85.7%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	13	26	33	15	9	27	34
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	12	25	33	14	9	26	34
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$60,450	$183,486	$335,493	$112,505	$66,900	$282,624	$59,582
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	57.1%	50.0%	66.7%	33.3%	150.0%	100.0%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	35.3%	30.8%	30.0%	66.7%	40.0%	80.0%	40.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.8%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	17	29	17	8	18	4	2
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	66.7%	80.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	33.3%	0.0%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	69.4%	71.0%	80.0%	73.3%	80.5%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	80.0%	92.9%	100.0%	75.8%	92.4%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	37.5%	68.3%	68.3%	97.8%	97.8%	87.5%	87.5%
		Goal	Combined	46.7%	72.3%	72.3%	98.1%	98.1%	88.9%	88.9%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	44.6%	55.4%	59.6%	86.0%	87.7%	80.4%	87.5%
		Review Indicator	Combined	51.7%	61.7%	65.6%	90.2%	91.8%	85.0%	91.7%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	32.6%	41.7%	66.7%	18.6%	39.0%	56.7%	69.4%
		Review Indicator	Combined	35.6%	42.0%	66.1%	18.3%	38.3%	55.7%	68.3%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	20.9%	29.9%	53.7%	61.2%	67.2%	79.1%	86.6%
		Informational Only	Combined	23.9%	31.3%	55.2%	61.2%	67.2%	79.1%	86.6%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	43.2%	49.3%	56.9%	58.1%	59.9%	65.6%	67.9%
C		Informational Only	Combined	43.0%	49.1%	57.1%	58.3%	60.1%	65.8%	68.0%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	13.6%	17.2%	21.3%	23.1%	25.0%	28.1%	29.7%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	15	18	11	12	8	7	2
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	15	18	11	12	9	8	3
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	81.2%	81.4%	91.3%	87.8%	87.2%	84.0%	92.3%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	1.4%	17.7%	14.5%	4.4%	5.0%	3.1%	3.6%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	30.8%	25.0%	50.0%	14.3%	50.0%	0.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	1.9%	5.7%	3.8%	3.8%	1.9%	5.7%	5.7%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	3.8%	1.9%	1.9%	0.0%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	1.0%	0.5%	0.5%	1.5%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	60.0%	75.0%	50.0%	40.0%	0.0%	28.6%	100.0%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	200.0%	60.0%	100.0%	100.0%	50.0%	50.0%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	26.7%	23.5%	27.8%	23.1%	10.0%	12.5%	0.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	87.0%	84.2%	72.2%	70.0%	50.0%	20.0%	20.0%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	13	26	33	15	9	27	34
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	66.7%	100.0%	83.3%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.