SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Kansas, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	303	303	303	303	303	303	303	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	303	303	303	303	303	303	303	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	291	291	291	291	291	291	291	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	291	291	291	291	291	291	291	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	763	763	763	763	763	763	763	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	763	763	763	763	763	763	763	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	1,396	1,746	1,801	1,492	1,089	768	363	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	1,396	1,746	1,801	1,492	1,089	768	363	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	534	534	534	534	534	534	534	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	534	534	534	534	534	534	534	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	13	13	13	13	13	13	13	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	13	13	13	13	13	13	13	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	193	193	193	193	193	193	193	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	193	193	193	193	193	193	193	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	99.7%	99.7%	99.7%	99.7%	99.7%	99.7%	99.7%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	99.3%	99.3%	99.3%	99.3%	99.3%	99.3%	99.3%
		Data Quality	Combined	98.3%	98.3%	98.3%	98.3%	98.3%	98.3%	98.3%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	560	556	426	441	566	590	611
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	664	623	570	589	647	651	653
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	138	109	65	76	59	64	69
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	79	67	68	87	56	61
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	200	203	108	102	120	87	94
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	87	53	28	47	64	56	25
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	85	53	27	40	60	53	25
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	43	17	1	6	16	3	9
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	42	17	1	6	16	3	9
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	100.0%	100.0%	93.8%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	100.0%	83.3%	93.8%	100.0%	88.9%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	41	32	36	20	28	43	31
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	39	25	36	19	26	36	27
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$247,300	$229,220	$483,000	$226,500	$439,025	$408,250	$853,750
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	6	6	6	6	6	6	6	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	113.0%	66.7%	47.4%	51.5%	56.5%	29.2%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	78.4%	69.0%	60.0%	48.0%	48.7%	50.0%	22.6%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	6	2	1	2	2	3	1
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	100.0%	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	22.2%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0 / 0	0.0%	80.1%	80.7%	89.9%	34.3%	85.6%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	100.0%	98.1%	96.1%	46.8%	94.1%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	86.6%	99.3%	99.3%	100.0%	100.0%	98.6%	98.6%
		Goal	Combined	86.6%	99.3%	99.3%	100.0%	100.0%	98.6%	98.6%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	87.3%	89.7%	89.1%	91.9%	94.5%	95.1%	96.1%
		Review Indicator	Combined	87.3%	89.7%	89.4%	92.2%	94.5%	95.1%	96.1%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	90.0%	99.3%	99.3%	34.7%	90.7%	99.3%	99.8%
		Review Indicator	Combined	90.3%	99.3%	99.5%	34.7%	90.7%	99.3%	99.8%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	75.9%	88.2%	88.2%	89.8%	92.5%	95.8%	97.1%
		Informational Only	Combined	76.4%	88.2%	88.5%	90.0%	92.5%	95.8%	97.1%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	73.7%	82.2%	82.9%	82.9%	82.0%	74.7%	67.6%
C		Informational Only	Combined	73.8%	82.2%	83.0%	83.0%	82.0%	74.7%	67.7%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	46.5%	57.3%	59.0%	49.7%	37.4%	26.9%	13.1%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	60	31	2	5	1	0	2
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	60	31	2	5	1	0	2
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	10	15	15	12	10	5	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	98.9%	99.1%	100.0%	99.0%	97.4%	96.5%	90.0%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	7.5%	9.0%	8.8%	10.4%	6.6%	6.8%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	50.0%	100.0%	100.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	5.9%	3.3%	0.3%	1.7%	5.0%	1.0%	3.0%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.3%	0.7%	0.7%	0.7%	0.3%	0.0%	0.0%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	2.1%	0.9%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.1%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	83.3%	71.4%	33.3%	50.0%	52.9%	16.7%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	72.7%	26.7%	75.0%	100.0%	81.2%	94.4%	100.0%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	33.3%	37.5%	50.0%	33.3%	0.0%	20.0%	25.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	67.1%	61.9%	67.9%	94.7%	68.2%	52.4%	53.3%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	41	32	36	20	28	43	31
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	95.5%	100.0%	96.4%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.