SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Kentucky, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	287	287	287	287	287	287	287	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	287	287	287	287	287	287	287	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	282	282	282	282	282	282	282	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	282	282	282	282	282	282	282	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	342	342	342	342	342	342	342	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	342	342	342	342	342	342	342	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	9	9	9	9	9	9	9	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	399	401	405	144	63	38	40	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	399	401	405	144	63	38	40	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	261	261	261	261	261	261	261	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	261	261	261	261	261	261	261	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	29	29	29	29	29	29	29	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	29	29	29	29	29	29	29	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	187	187	187	187	187	187	187	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	187	187	187	187	187	187	187	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	81.3%	81.3%	81.3%	81.3%	81.3%	81.3%	81.3%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	28.3%	28.3%	28.3%	28.3%	28.3%	28.3%	28.3%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	98.6%	98.6%	98.6%	98.6%	98.6%	98.6%	98.6%
		Data Quality	Combined	97.9%	97.9%	97.9%	97.9%	97.9%	97.9%	97.9%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	169	181	207	229	303	338	345
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	201	268	273	280	355	353	360
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	1	2	5	1	8	1	12
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	129	137	134	120	186	196
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	144	140	142	139	124	189	198
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	42	8	5	3	36	101	86
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	24	8	5	3	27	66	57
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	16	10	15	17	16	14	21
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	14	9	15	17	11	14	21
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	46.7%	88.2%	75.0%	14.3%	52.4%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	92.9%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	17	5	10	9	17	20	16
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	15	5	9	9	15	19	15
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$440,000	$165,150	$165,850	$122,700	$235,500	$424,425	$369,125
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	42.9%	51.2%	39.0%	42.1%	37.2%	34.0%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	37.8%	34.9%	46.7%	40.0%	41.5%	37.8%	33.3%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	12.5%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	4.9%	0.0%	0.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	1	5	2	8	0	2	0
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	93.8%	90.0%	20.0%	52.9%	31.2%	21.4%	42.9%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	66.5%	91.3%	86.0%	30.3%	92.4%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	57.1%	45.5%	76.0%	62.8%	95.0%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	87.9%	74.7%	74.7%	75.1%	75.1%	95.3%	95.3%
		Goal	Combined	88.3%	79.4%	79.4%	77.1%	77.1%	95.7%	95.7%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	71.9%	63.2%	67.9%	65.4%	77.6%	92.3%	90.0%
		Review Indicator	Combined	73.6%	67.3%	70.3%	67.1%	77.9%	92.6%	90.0%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	70.4%	61.9%	68.0%	41.5%	66.5%	81.5%	92.3%
		Review Indicator	Combined	70.4%	64.3%	70.2%	41.5%	66.5%	81.5%	92.3%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	35.4%	39.7%	45.7%	47.0%	59.2%	76.1%	90.0%
		Informational Only	Combined	35.4%	41.6%	47.5%	50.2%	61.2%	76.8%	90.0%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	44.6%	44.7%	44.8%	45.1%	55.3%	72.1%	85.7%
C		Informational Only	Combined	44.6%	46.3%	46.4%	48.0%	57.3%	72.7%	85.7%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	34.7%	30.6%	22.5%	8.3%	3.9%	2.3%	2.4%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	45	69	44	48	87	76	49
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	45	69	44	48	87	76	49
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	100.0%	100.0%	98.4%	98.0%	97.6%	82.4%	99.2%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	25.6%	24.7%	24.2%	16.3%	22.1%	25.5%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	50.0%	33.3%	66.7%	0 / 0	50.0%	0 / 0
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	100.0%
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	2.8%	2.8%	3.1%	3.5%	3.1%	3.8%	5.9%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	1.2%	0.3%	1.2%	0.9%	0.3%	0.9%	1.2%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	81.8%	50.0%	77.8%	85.7%	72.7%	58.3%	55.6%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	26.7%	14.3%	50.0%	66.7%	77.8%	69.2%	69.2%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	66.7%	33.3%	75.0%	87.5%	83.3%	50.0%	50.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	41.7%	61.9%	81.8%	81.4%	77.1%	61.8%	41.4%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	13	5	8	9	15	19	16
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	81.8%	75.0%	80.0%	25.0%	27.3%	77.8%	100.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.