SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Massachusetts, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	146	146	146	146	146	146	146	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	146	146	146	146	146	146	146	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	144	144	144	144	144	144	144	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	144	144	144	144	144	144	144	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	902	902	902	902	902	902	902	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	902	902	902	902	902	902	902	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	24	24	24	24	24	24	24	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	1,429	1,652	1,791	1,683	1,419	1,187	1,059	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	1,429	1,652	1,791	1,683	1,419	1,187	1,059	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	196	196	196	196	196	196	196	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	196	196	196	196	196	196	196	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	46	46	46	46	46	46	46	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	46	46	46	46	46	46	46	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	86	86	86	86	86	86	86	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	86	86	86	86	86	86	86	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	90.4%	90.4%	90.4%	90.4%	90.4%	90.4%	90.4%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	30.0%	30.0%	30.0%	30.0%	30.0%	30.0%	30.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	93.2%	93.2%	93.2%	93.2%	93.2%	93.2%	93.2%
		Data Quality	Combined	85.0%	85.0%	85.0%	85.0%	85.0%	85.0%	85.0%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	96	124	158	166	147	143	149
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	105	131	166	173	153	145	151
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	1,672	1,616	1,598	2,172	1,575	1,968	1,103
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	20	26	36	15	23	51
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	22	25	31	41	19	26	53
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	75	161	211	96	196	56	161
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	73	154	207	90	193	54	158
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	13	21	19	23	10	11	9
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	11	21	19	23	10	11	9
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	89.5%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	44	47	46	47	47	73	23
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	41	46	44	46	45	73	23
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$411,850	$635,087	$589,935	$965,776	$397,476	$2,310,324	$557,762
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	250.0%	141.7%	105.0%	110.0%	85.7%	57.9%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	171.4%	212.5%	142.9%	104.5%	133.3%	87.5%	63.2%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	5.0%	4.3%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	2	7	4	11	2	3	9
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	92.3%	90.5%	31.6%	21.7%	50.0%	45.5%	22.2%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	32.7%	84.1%	74.8%	90.9%	54.6%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	50.0%	83.8%	99.1%	98.7%	42.4%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	64.1%	73.7%	73.7%	75.0%	75.0%	82.6%	82.6%
		Goal	Combined	69.5%	74.6%	74.6%	76.8%	76.8%	84.8%	84.8%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	48.0%	67.8%	69.1%	70.3%	71.8%	78.4%	82.9%
		Review Indicator	Combined	51.3%	69.1%	71.1%	73.0%	76.5%	80.4%	83.6%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	55.9%	78.0%	91.0%	38.9%	63.8%	81.5%	89.9%
		Review Indicator	Combined	57.9%	78.3%	91.2%	42.4%	67.6%	84.8%	91.8%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	39.3%	58.9%	72.6%	84.5%	88.1%	89.9%	92.3%
		Informational Only	Combined	41.7%	60.1%	74.4%	86.3%	89.3%	91.7%	94.6%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	87.2%	89.7%	89.8%	87.0%	83.6%	80.4%	73.4%
C		Informational Only	Combined	87.3%	89.7%	89.8%	87.2%	84.2%	81.3%	74.3%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	56.7%	51.5%	51.4%	47.1%	38.7%	31.6%	27.3%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	38	42	49	25	4	3	2
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	38	42	49	25	4	3	2
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	1	1	1	1	0	0	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	6.4%	87.5%	97.8%	100.0%	98.5%	99.3%	100.0%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	5.2%	7.9%	11.0%	5.3%	10.5%	15.6%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	25.0%	33.3%	20.0%	50.0%	20.0%	28.6%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	50.0%	100.0%	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	4.1%	6.8%	8.2%	14.4%	6.2%	4.8%	6.2%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	1.4%	0.0%	0.7%	0.7%	0.0%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.2%	1.0%	0.3%	0.2%	0.1%	0.3%	0.0%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.1%	0.2%	0.0%	0.1%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	66.7%	60.0%	46.7%	75.0%	50.0%	66.7%	57.1%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	86.7%	79.3%	66.7%	41.2%	76.5%	80.0%	76.5%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	40.0%	22.2%	33.3%	61.5%	72.7%	25.0%	25.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	50.0%	28.9%	18.2%	18.4%	32.1%	36.8%	48.0%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	43	46	45	47	47	72	22
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	88.9%	78.6%	90.0%	85.7%	66.7%	72.7%	100.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.