SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Maryland, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	122	122	122	122	122	122	122	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	122	122	122	122	122	122	122	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	119	119	119	119	119	119	119	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	119	119	119	119	119	119	119	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	193	193	193	193	193	193	193	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	193	193	193	193	193	193	193	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	973	1,325	1,695	1,921	2,019	2,137	2,145	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	973	1,325	1,695	1,921	2,019	2,137	2,145	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	182	182	182	182	182	182	182	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	182	182	182	182	182	182	182	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	6	6	6	6	6	6	6	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	6	6	6	6	6	6	6	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	67	67	67	67	67	67	67	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	67	67	67	67	67	67	67	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	87.2%	87.2%	87.2%	87.2%	87.2%	87.2%	87.2%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	88.9%	88.9%	88.9%	88.9%	88.9%	88.9%	88.9%
		Data Quality	Combined	88.9%	88.9%	88.9%	88.9%	88.9%	88.9%	88.9%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	187	190	99	99	106	126	125
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	222	223	113	113	115	136	131
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	469	722	1,309	2,491	2,381	2,509	2,539
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	66	88	79	60	71	64
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	47	146	110	89	68	78	72
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	254	334	280	113	147	211	123
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	231	308	249	104	133	197	109
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	13	10	10	13	14	11	11
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	12	10	9	10	12	10	6
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	100.0%	92.3%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	100.0%	84.6%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	21	33	19	63	28	35	21
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	19	30	19	61	28	29	16
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$104,700	$375,000	$260,100	$656,900	$588,000	$534,300	$258,000
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	84.6%	52.6%	50.0%	60.0%	43.8%	37.5%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	77.8%	35.5%	45.5%	44.4%	59.3%	45.5%	34.6%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	2	3	1	2	0	3	3
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	100.0%	100.0%	90.0%	76.9%	57.1%	54.5%	90.9%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0 / 0	0.0%	87.0%	90.5%	92.2%	86.6%	83.0%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	95.0%	100.0%	95.7%	100.0%	97.6%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
		Goal	Combined	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	93.9%	95.2%	93.7%	94.2%	94.8%	100.0%	99.2%
		Review Indicator	Combined	93.9%	95.2%	93.7%	94.2%	94.8%	100.0%	99.2%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	99.3%	99.3%	27.7%	53.6%	81.3%	91.6%
		Review Indicator	Combined	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	27.7%	53.6%	82.0%	92.3%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	64.4%	72.3%	75.4%	77.0%	78.0%	79.1%	95.3%
		Informational Only	Combined	64.4%	73.3%	76.4%	78.0%	78.0%	79.1%	96.3%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	70.7%	77.8%	80.1%	82.7%	84.4%	87.6%	95.9%
C		Informational Only	Combined	70.7%	77.8%	80.1%	82.7%	84.4%	87.6%	96.8%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	12.9%	15.2%	17.6%	19.5%	20.3%	21.2%	20.9%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	7
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	0	0	0	0	0	0	7
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	99.2%	98.5%	98.6%	100.0%	95.5%	100.0%	100.0%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	7.8%	17.0%	18.5%	23.6%	22.6%	22.3%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	100.0%	100.0%	33.3%	0.0%	100.0%	50.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0.0%	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	9.0%	4.9%	4.9%	7.4%	9.0%	6.6%	4.9%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.8%	1.6%	0.8%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.5%	1.0%	1.0%	0.5%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	80.0%	81.8%	71.4%	50.0%	44.4%	83.3%	87.5%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	45.5%	70.0%	30.8%	58.8%	42.9%	70.8%	50.0%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	14.3%	66.7%	100.0%	66.7%	50.0%	0.0%	0.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	22.7%	14.8%	3.6%	3.6%	3.6%	0.0%	0.0%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	17	32	15	60	26	24	12
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	50.0%	100.0%	71.4%	100.0%	66.7%	100.0%	100.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.