SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Maine, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	62	62	62	62	62	62	62	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	62	62	62	62	62	62	62	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	62	62	62	62	62	62	62	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	62	62	62	62	62	62	62	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	177	177	177	177	177	177	177	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	177	177	177	177	177	177	177	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	170	222	251	275	274	285	291	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	170	222	251	275	274	285	291	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	66	66	66	66	66	66	66	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	66	66	66	66	66	66	66	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	47	47	47	47	47	47	47	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	47	47	47	47	47	47	47	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	47.1%	47.1%	47.1%	47.1%	47.1%	47.1%	47.1%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	15.9%	15.9%	15.9%	15.9%	15.9%	15.9%	15.9%
		Data Quality	Combined	14.3%	14.3%	14.3%	14.3%	14.3%	14.3%	14.3%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	87	85	95	71	59	103	82
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	99	107	106	79	63	106	86
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	247	195	147	160	160	163	155
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	33	35	40	46	54	50
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	35	35	36	41	47	55	51
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	39	84	45	41	26	35	19
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	36	54	39	36	23	29	14
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	3	7	13	10	8	6	8
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	3	7	11	9	8	6	8
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0.0%	30.8%	30.0%	37.5%	50.0%	87.5%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	50.0%	84.6%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	50.0%	84.6%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	9	14	8	17	14	10	7
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	9	9	8	16	14	10	7
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$255,075	$221,686	$61,282	$405,855	$320,657	$192,250	$28,405
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	350.0%	366.7%	162.5%	58.3%	21.4%	53.8%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	400.0%	350.0%	366.7%	162.5%	66.7%	21.4%	53.8%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	3.0%	0.9%	2.5%	0.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	2	5	3	4	3	5	2
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	100.0%	71.4%	15.4%	10.0%	0.0%	0.0%	12.5%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	32.6%	55.9%	15.0%	31.0%	45.5%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	84.6%	80.0%	25.8%	62.1%	52.6%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	76.7%	70.5%	70.5%	82.3%	82.3%	87.1%	87.1%
		Goal	Combined	78.3%	70.5%	70.5%	83.9%	83.9%	90.3%	90.3%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	88.2%	72.1%	81.4%	83.6%	56.9%	87.3%	92.1%
		Review Indicator	Combined	88.4%	72.1%	82.9%	85.1%	56.9%	90.5%	95.2%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	81.4%	82.2%	86.7%	48.6%	59.5%	75.6%	86.5%
		Review Indicator	Combined	81.8%	84.4%	86.7%	51.4%	61.9%	80.0%	90.4%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	63.6%	67.3%	70.9%	82.1%	85.7%	81.8%	90.9%
		Informational Only	Combined	65.5%	69.1%	70.9%	82.1%	85.7%	83.6%	94.5%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	70.0%	74.6%	76.2%	79.5%	76.8%	73.9%	73.4%
C		Informational Only	Combined	70.5%	75.1%	76.7%	80.0%	77.8%	75.5%	76.1%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	31.0%	39.5%	43.1%	46.5%	44.8%	45.6%	45.4%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	11	21	26	9	11	24	15
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	11	21	26	9	11	24	15
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	90.6%	96.5%	100.0%	81.5%	100.0%	100.0%	88.1%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	9.8%	9.9%	17.1%	25.3%	22.8%	27.7%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	25.0%	50.0%	40.0%	100.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	50.0%	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	4.8%	8.1%	12.9%	9.7%	9.7%	3.2%	11.3%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	1.6%	0.0%	0.0%	1.6%	1.6%	0.0%	0.0%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	1.1%	0.6%	1.7%	0.6%	2.3%	0.6%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	66.7%	80.0%	66.7%	81.8%	77.8%	100.0%	66.7%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	66.7%	66.7%	25.0%	25.0%	40.0%	66.7%	28.6%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	25.0%	60.0%	83.3%	83.3%	60.0%	60.0%	80.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	41.7%	42.9%	50.0%	61.9%	68.2%	66.7%	66.7%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	9	14	8	17	14	10	7
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	50.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.