SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Michigan, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	474	474	474	474	474	474	474	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	474	474	474	474	474	474	474	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	446	446	446	446	446	446	446	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	446	446	446	446	446	446	446	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	1,544	1,544	1,544	1,544	1,544	1,544	1,544	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	1,544	1,544	1,544	1,544	1,544	1,544	1,544	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	60	60	60	60	60	60	60	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	60	60	60	60	60	60	60	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	282	287	297	174	76	61	58	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	282	287	297	174	76	61	58	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	534	534	534	534	534	534	534	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	534	534	534	534	534	534	534	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	206	206	206	206	206	206	206	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	206	206	206	206	206	206	206	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	484	484	484	484	484	484	484	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	484	484	484	484	484	484	484	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	89.1%	89.1%	89.1%	89.1%	89.1%	89.1%	89.1%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	86.2%	86.2%	86.2%	86.2%	86.2%	86.2%	86.2%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	92.0%	92.0%	92.0%	92.0%	92.0%	92.0%	92.0%
		Data Quality	Combined	92.0%	92.0%	92.0%	92.0%	92.0%	92.0%	92.0%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	432	475	469	481	468	454	461
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	501	526	493	554	503	479	468
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	1	3	9	301	2,040	550	524
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	137	154	137	193	242	259
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	147	154	155	138	194	243	261
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	4	9	7	20	49	46	120
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	3	8	5	17	43	38	92
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	7	25	7	18	16	13	3
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	6	24	7	17	16	13	3
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	0.0%	0.0%	57.1%	94.4%	12.5%	0.0%	0.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	94.4%	31.2%	38.5%	0.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	94.4%	18.8%	7.7%	0.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	14	7	23	15	32	23	9
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	14	7	23	14	24	16	9
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$1,248,467	$1,171,608	$1,859,442	$903,115	$1,447,076	$649,580	$123,563
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	78	78	78	78	78	78	78	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	56.2%	32.6%	37.1%	24.6%	13.3%	5.9%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	53.1%	71.1%	60.5%	71.4%	43.5%	29.6%	13.7%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	0 / 0	100.0%	0.0%	2.8%	8.1%	0.4%	0.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	1	34	65	16
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	85.7%	96.0%	42.9%	27.8%	18.8%	0.0%	0.0%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	85.0%	64.5%	23.6%	41.4%	24.3%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	47.4%	20.6%	7.5%	39.1%	27.1%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	55.1%	95.8%	95.8%	94.6%	94.6%	90.3%	90.3%
		Goal	Combined	55.1%	95.8%	95.8%	94.6%	94.6%	90.3%	90.3%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	76.6%	80.5%	80.2%	81.4%	81.3%	77.8%	76.9%
		Review Indicator	Combined	76.6%	80.5%	80.2%	81.4%	81.3%	77.8%	76.9%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	77.4%	90.3%	98.0%	39.6%	69.9%	83.1%	91.1%
		Review Indicator	Combined	77.4%	90.3%	98.0%	39.6%	69.9%	83.1%	91.1%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	36.0%	50.4%	64.4%	74.6%	80.2%	85.2%	89.9%
		Informational Only	Combined	36.0%	50.4%	64.4%	74.6%	80.2%	85.2%	89.9%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	44.1%	50.5%	56.9%	55.7%	52.3%	54.8%	57.9%
C		Informational Only	Combined	44.4%	50.8%	57.2%	55.9%	52.6%	55.1%	58.1%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	17.5%	17.6%	17.8%	8.9%	1.1%	0.7%	0.5%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	244	228	35	48	18	42	50
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	244	228	35	48	18	42	50
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.3%	3.0%	95.0%	92.5%	84.2%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	10.5%	13.4%	10.6%	21.2%	31.4%	34.0%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0.0%	40.0%	54.5%	100.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.4%	2.5%	0.8%	2.3%	1.7%	1.3%	0.4%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.6%	1.3%	1.7%	0.6%	1.9%	2.7%	1.9%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.1%	0.3%	0.1%	0.1%	0.5%	0.5%	0.1%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.1%	0.0%	0.1%	0.0%	0.2%	0.0%	0.1%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	71.4%	100.0%	78.6%	75.0%	50.0%	100.0%	50.0%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	50.0%	66.7%	50.0%	85.0%	92.0%	98.1%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0.0%	0.0%	11.8%	14.3%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	95.2%	84.4%	75.7%	73.3%	70.3%	58.1%	65.0%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	13	6	21	15	32	23	9
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	83.3%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	85.7%	100.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.