| Metric |
Metric Type |
Agency |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Graph |
| 1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete. |
| A | Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current) | Data Quality | State | 283 | 283 | 283 | 283 | 283 | 283 | 283 | n/a |
| Combined | 283 | 283 | 283 | 283 | 283 | 283 | 283 | n/a |
| Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current) | Data Quality | State | 283 | 283 | 283 | 283 | 283 | 283 | 283 | n/a |
| Combined | 283 | 283 | 283 | 283 | 283 | 283 | 283 | n/a |
| B | Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current) | Data Quality | State | 251 | 251 | 251 | 251 | 251 | 251 | 251 | n/a |
| Combined | 251 | 251 | 251 | 251 | 251 | 251 | 251 | n/a |
| Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current) | Data Quality | State | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | n/a |
| Combined | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | n/a |
| Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current) | Informational Only | State | 141 | 167 | 174 | 148 | 115 | 91 | 62 | n/a |
| Combined | 141 | 167 | 174 | 148 | 115 | 91 | 62 | n/a |
| C | CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current) | Data Quality | State | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 | n/a |
| Combined | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 | 98 | n/a |
| CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current) | Data Quality | State | 69 | 69 | 69 | 69 | 69 | 69 | 69 | n/a |
| Combined | 69 | 69 | 69 | 69 | 69 | 69 | 69 | n/a |
| CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current) | Data Quality | State | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | n/a |
| Combined | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | 83 | n/a |
| CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005 | Data Quality | State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |  |
| CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005 | Data Quality | State | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005 | Data Quality | State | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| Combined | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% | |
| D | Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 230 | 168 | 186 | 137 | 176 | 144 | 170 | |
| Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 248 | 198 | 201 | 149 | 178 | 149 | 172 | |
| Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY) | Informational Only | State | 12 | 13 | 198 | 177 | 59 | 181 | 159 | |
| E | Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 27 | 32 | 92 | 134 | 297 | 239 | |
| Combined | 13 | 30 | 34 | 95 | 137 | 300 | 240 | |
| F | Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 77 | 70 | 102 | 60 | 48 | 77 | 54 | |
| Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 73 | 65 | 94 | 56 | 44 | 73 | 52 | |
| G | HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 11 | 28 | 21 | 26 | 38 | 40 | 29 | |
| HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 10 | 27 | 20 | 24 | 37 | 38 | 26 | |
| H | HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery | Data Quality | State | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 80.0% | 76.9% | 84.2% | 95.0% | 96.6% | |
| HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs | Data Quality | State | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s) | Data Quality | State | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 95.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 96.6% | |
| I | Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 40 | 58 | 51 | 60 | 74 | 93 | 80 | |
| Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 36 | 47 | 44 | 55 | 70 | 85 | 71 | |
| J | Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | $645,142 | $993,422 | $160,991 | $302,776 | $1,147,956 | $585,944 | $753,654 | |
| K | Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current) | Review Indicator | State | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | n/a |
| 2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate. |
| A | Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 / 0 | 120.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 102.9% | 50.0% | 30.4% | |
| Combined | 163.6% | 118.2% | 113.6% | 104.8% | 113.9% | 56.4% | 35.7% | |
| B | Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY) | Goal | State | 4.7% | 7.0% | 1.9% | 1.9% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.4% | |
| Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 15 | 20 | 18 | 22 | 23 | 14 | 30 | |
| 3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete. |
| A | Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY) | Goal | State | 100.0% | 96.4% | 52.4% | 34.6% | 34.2% | 27.5% | 13.8% | |
| B | Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY) | Goal | State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 73.7% | 28.0% | 50.7% | 38.6% | 63.3% | |
| Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY) | Goal | State | 0 / 0 | 0.0% | 74.4% | 73.3% | 67.6% | 84.6% | 38.9% | |
| 5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations. |
| A | CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle) | Goal | State | 84.6% | 98.5% | 98.5% | 99.2% | 99.2% | 98.9% | 98.9% | |
| Combined | 84.6% | 98.5% | 98.5% | 99.2% | 99.2% | 98.9% | 98.9% | |
| CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 88.2% | 91.4% | 93.0% | 92.6% | 91.8% | 95.5% | 97.9% | |
| Combined | 88.2% | 91.4% | 93.0% | 92.6% | 91.8% | 95.5% | 98.3% | |
| B | CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) 1 | Review Indicator | State | 86.2% | 98.3% | 100.0% | 16.3% | 27.3% | 38.2% | 43.3% | |
| Combined | 86.2% | 98.3% | 100.0% | 16.3% | 27.3% | 38.2% | 43.3% | |
| CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY) | Informational Only | State | 52.2% | 67.7% | 74.9% | 79.7% | 72.0% | 55.0% | 38.6% | |
| Combined | 52.2% | 67.7% | 74.9% | 79.7% | 72.0% | 55.0% | 38.6% | |
| C | CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY) | Informational Only | State | 60.7% | 74.9% | 81.6% | 84.1% | 83.4% | 85.4% | 86.2% | |
| Combined | 61.8% | 75.9% | 81.9% | 84.5% | 83.7% | 85.4% | 86.9% | |
| D | CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY) | Informational Only | State | 21.8% | 23.2% | 23.5% | 19.3% | 10.4% | 6.7% | 3.8% | |
| E | Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status | Review Indicator | State | 51 | 48 | 17 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 18 | |
| Combined | 51 | 48 | 17 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 18 | |
| F | CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY) | Informational Only | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| G | Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY) | Goal | State | 92.2% | 94.8% | 99.6% | 99.3% | 99.1% | 99.6% | 100.0% | |
| 7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information. |
| C | Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 0.0% | 8.7% | 10.9% | 45.4% | 44.8% | 77.5% | 70.8% | |
| Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 0.0% | 41.2% | 46.2% | 40.0% | 92.9% | 71.4% | 72.7% | |
| EPA | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner. |
| A | High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 2.1% | 6.0% | 5.3% | 5.3% | 9.5% | 8.5% | 6.7% | |
| EPA | 0.0% | 0.7% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.4% | 2.1% | 1.1% | |
| B | High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 1.6% | 2.4% | 1.6% | 2.4% | 3.2% | 4.0% | 2.0% | |
| EPA | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| C | Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 50.0% | 81.8% | 88.9% | 90.9% | 77.3% | 82.8% | 66.7% | |
| D | Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 77.3% | 37.5% | 84.2% | 88.9% | 31.6% | 76.5% | 28.6% | |
| E | Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 35.3% | 73.7% | 72.7% | 52.6% | 63.6% | 82.6% | 85.0% | |
| 10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media. |
| A | Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 69.7% | 50.0% | 41.9% | 54.0% | 51.6% | 46.2% | 37.0% | |
| 12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected. |
| A | No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 40 | 58 | 51 | 60 | 74 | 93 | 80 | |
| B | Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 85.7% | 92.0% | 85.7% | 78.6% | 76.9% | 87.5% | 92.0% | |
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}