SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Missouri, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	307	307	307	307	307	307	307	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	307	307	307	307	307	307	307	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	289	289	289	289	289	289	289	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	289	289	289	289	289	289	289	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	304	304	304	304	304	304	304	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	304	304	304	304	304	304	304	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	15	15	15	15	15	15	15	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	15	15	15	15	15	15	15	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	1,052	1,224	1,487	1,518	1,622	1,750	1,845	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	1,052	1,224	1,487	1,518	1,622	1,750	1,845	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	252	252	252	252	252	252	252	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	252	252	252	252	252	252	252	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	50	50	50	50	50	50	50	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	50	50	50	50	50	50	50	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	189	189	189	189	189	189	189	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	189	189	189	189	189	189	189	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	94.9%	94.9%	94.9%	94.9%	94.9%	94.9%	94.9%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	80.0%	80.0%	80.0%	80.0%	80.0%	80.0%	80.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	96.1%	96.1%	96.1%	96.1%	96.1%	96.1%	96.1%
		Data Quality	Combined	95.8%	95.8%	95.8%	95.8%	95.8%	95.8%	95.8%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	387	381	401	384	371	420	373
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	503	455	497	458	445	507	429
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	1	4	4	1	2	3	0
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	80	53	38	20	23	13
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	279	292	115	87	71	73	64
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	213	116	129	67	109	120	81
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	174	99	116	66	107	110	77
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	17	17	12	10	8	7	1
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	17	16	12	10	8	7	1
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	100.0%	0.0%	41.7%	40.0%	75.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	74	64	40	39	29	22	56
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	72	60	39	38	29	22	55
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$251,450	$137,000	$72,000	$235,000	$88,311	$140,500	$196,700
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	72.7%	75.0%	100.0%	150.0%	100.0%	100.0%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	39.0%	40.9%	66.7%	84.6%	114.3%	75.0%	37.5%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	2	2	1	4	4	4	1
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	94.1%	94.1%	75.0%	40.0%	12.5%	85.7%	100.0%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	40.3%	38.5%	41.3%	43.1%	35.4%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	74.2%	68.1%	63.4%	40.7%	39.1%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	95.8%	93.5%	93.5%	92.5%	92.5%	87.2%	87.2%
		Goal	Combined	95.8%	93.6%	93.6%	93.2%	93.2%	87.5%	87.5%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	90.0%	87.8%	89.9%	89.4%	85.6%	86.6%	86.9%
		Review Indicator	Combined	90.0%	88.4%	90.2%	90.0%	85.9%	86.9%	88.3%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	98.9%	99.3%	99.3%	64.8%	82.2%	86.9%	88.1%
		Review Indicator	Combined	99.2%	99.3%	99.3%	65.6%	83.3%	87.6%	88.8%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	88.4%	91.9%	94.3%	94.3%	94.2%	90.6%	90.5%
		Informational Only	Combined	89.1%	92.2%	94.3%	94.3%	94.5%	91.0%	90.9%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	86.7%	90.4%	93.0%	92.0%	90.8%	87.4%	87.0%
C		Informational Only	Combined	87.2%	90.7%	93.0%	92.1%	91.1%	87.8%	87.3%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	31.3%	36.0%	44.0%	45.9%	49.8%	53.9%	56.5%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	20	42	21	17	17	64	83
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	20	42	21	17	17	64	83
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	88.2%	98.9%	100.0%	100.0%	98.3%	100.0%	100.0%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	7.3%	6.4%	4.8%	1.8%	2.3%	1.2%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	50.0%	100.0%	0.0%	16.7%	0.0%	0.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	1.6%	2.9%	2.0%	2.6%	2.0%	2.0%	0.3%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	1.3%	0.0%	0.0%	0.7%	0.3%	0.3%	0.0%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	1.0%	1.6%	0.7%	0.3%	0.3%	0.0%	0.0%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	46.2%	75.0%	54.5%	50.0%	60.0%	80.0%	18.2%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	73.7%	38.1%	64.5%	62.5%	66.7%	68.4%	85.7%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	66.7%	33.3%	0.0%	25.0%	25.0%	0.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	38.3%	53.2%	41.5%	51.9%	52.2%	38.5%	45.5%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	73	64	39	39	29	22	56
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	82.4%	88.9%	100.0%	90.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.