SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Mississippi, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	278	278	278	278	278	278	278	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	278	278	278	278	278	278	278	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	276	276	276	276	276	276	276	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	276	276	276	276	276	276	276	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	273	273	273	273	273	273	273	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	273	273	273	273	273	273	273	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	56	62	70	65	55	49	46	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	56	62	70	65	55	49	46	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	257	257	257	257	257	257	257	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	257	257	257	257	257	257	257	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	34	34	34	34	34	34	34	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	34	34	34	34	34	34	34	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	192	192	192	192	192	192	192	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	192	192	192	192	192	192	192	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
		Data Quality	Combined	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	173	153	209	172	192	178	204
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	200	179	235	192	207	189	208
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	20	16	13	31	31	51
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	13	14	23	20	48	56
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	31	16	14	23	20	48	56
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	10	8	11	13	31	40	59
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	10	8	11	12	31	38	57
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	12	8	14	15	16	20	22
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	12	8	14	15	16	20	20
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	100.0%	78.6%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	100.0%	78.6%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	12	12	9	9	4	21	24
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	12	12	9	8	4	21	23
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$325,400	$399,190	$226,200	$214,500	$68,250	$295,362	$162,512
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	216.7%	125.0%	66.7%	110.0%	93.8%	50.0%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	120.0%	185.7%	125.0%	66.7%	110.0%	93.8%	50.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	2.3%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	2	0	9	8	20	16	6
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	100.0%	62.5%	35.7%	40.0%	25.0%	35.0%	0.0%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	77.8%	46.7%	49.5%	46.8%	46.8%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0 / 0	0.0%	40.0%	45.0%	35.5%	41.2%	55.6%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	82.2%	90.1%	90.1%	95.3%	95.3%	98.9%	98.9%
		Goal	Combined	83.7%	91.0%	91.0%	95.3%	95.3%	98.9%	98.9%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	81.7%	77.6%	81.6%	87.5%	92.9%	94.1%	96.5%
		Review Indicator	Combined	82.7%	78.7%	81.6%	87.5%	92.9%	94.1%	96.5%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	81.9%	88.2%	97.4%	23.0%	46.6%	61.9%	83.5%
		Review Indicator	Combined	81.9%	88.2%	97.4%	23.0%	46.6%	61.9%	83.5%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	43.4%	54.8%	69.5%	73.5%	82.4%	87.5%	91.2%
		Informational Only	Combined	43.4%	54.8%	69.5%	73.5%	82.4%	87.5%	91.2%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	62.8%	66.1%	74.8%	78.3%	85.8%	89.7%	92.9%
C		Informational Only	Combined	63.0%	66.3%	74.9%	78.3%	85.8%	89.7%	92.9%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	37.1%	23.3%	15.8%	14.6%	11.6%	9.5%	8.2%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	49	31	28	36	25	0	0
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	49	31	28	36	25	0	0
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	2.4%	79.7%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	3.7%	4.3%	8.4%	5.9%	13.4%	17.8%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.0%	16.7%	50.0%	12.5%	14.3%	25.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	2.9%	1.8%	2.2%	2.2%	3.6%	4.0%	4.0%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.4%	0.7%	2.2%	2.6%	1.5%	3.3%	3.3%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	85.7%	90.9%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	33.3%	45.5%	37.5%	65.5%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	16.7%	0.0%	33.3%	40.0%	54.5%	60.0%	60.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	71.2%	62.2%	45.2%	30.8%	39.3%	48.5%	45.5%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	12	12	9	9	4	21	24
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	83.3%	91.7%	87.5%	75.0%	75.0%	84.6%	92.3%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.