SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Montana, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	67	67	67	67	67	67	67	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	69	69	69	69	69	69	69	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	67	67	67	67	67	67	67	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	69	69	69	69	69	69	69	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	149	149	149	149	149	149	149	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	149	149	149	149	149	149	149	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	412	443	480	525	817	1,141	1,429	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	412	443	480	525	817	1,141	1,429	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	196	196	196	196	196	196	196	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	197	197	197	197	197	197	197	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	67	67	67	67	67	67	67	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	68	68	68	68	68	68	68	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	99.3%	99.3%	99.3%	99.3%	99.3%	99.3%	99.3%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
		Data Quality	Combined	95.8%	95.8%	95.8%	95.8%	95.8%	95.8%	95.8%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	68	67	52	74	69	79	60
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	86	81	69	90	79	88	67
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	146	301	347	630	1,177	1,398	1,845
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	12	12	9	9	11	12
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	19	17	17	14	14	17	13
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	9	12	53	54	74	80	307
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	8	11	47	47	68	72	300
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	9	4	6	28	15	7	8
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	8	4	5	22	9	6	6
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	17.9%	53.3%	71.4%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	0.0%	0.0%	33.3%	32.1%	100.0%	85.7%	87.5%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	0.0%	0.0%	33.3%	28.6%	66.7%	71.4%	87.5%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	2	10	17	13	17	15	28
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	2	6	8	8	12	15	26
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$64,000	$647,219	$3,005,627	$8,400	$0	$19,400	$143,281
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	400.0%	350.0%	1200.0%	800.0%	300.0%	150.0%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	300.0%	400.0%	350.0%	1200.0%	800.0%	150.0%	100.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	1.7%	0.8%	4.1%	0.0%	0.0%	0.4%	0.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	2	3	5	4	2	7	1
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	88.9%	0.0%	0.0%	21.4%	33.3%	14.3%	25.0%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0 / 0	0.0%	10.4%	35.8%	51.7%	49.3%	54.1%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	13.0%	49.0%	61.8%	33.3%	85.3%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	96.7%	98.4%	98.4%	98.5%	98.5%	97.1%	97.1%
		Goal	Combined	95.2%	96.9%	96.9%	98.6%	98.6%	97.2%	97.2%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	88.2%	87.8%	89.2%	90.5%	91.7%	94.3%	93.0%
		Review Indicator	Combined	87.3%	87.0%	88.3%	90.9%	92.0%	94.5%	94.6%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	80.0%	85.7%	90.9%	43.0%	71.4%	83.5%	94.1%
		Review Indicator	Combined	80.0%	85.7%	90.9%	43.0%	71.4%	83.5%	94.1%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	31.7%	41.2%	49.0%	59.0%	81.3%	88.9%	93.5%
		Informational Only	Combined	31.7%	41.2%	49.0%	59.0%	81.3%	88.9%	93.5%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	44.5%	52.1%	57.7%	75.3%	87.4%	93.4%	98.2%
C		Informational Only	Combined	44.5%	52.1%	57.7%	75.3%	87.4%	93.4%	98.2%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	14.4%	16.9%	20.0%	24.8%	47.6%	71.4%	92.2%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	5	6	2	8	5	4	5
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	6	8	3	9	5	4	5
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	1	1	2	3	3	2	2
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	98.2%	98.3%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	98.5%	100.0%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	6.1%	5.6%	3.8%	3.4%	3.3%	4.7%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	25.0%	25.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	11.9%	4.5%	7.5%	25.4%	10.4%	4.5%	6.0%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.7%	0.0%	2.7%	1.3%	2.0%	1.3%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	100.0%	85.7%	100.0%	87.5%	60.0%	40.0%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	25.0%	45.5%	41.2%	66.7%	83.3%	81.8%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	80.0%	57.1%	42.9%	20.0%	14.3%	28.6%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	35.3%	26.7%	41.2%	37.9%	51.9%	52.6%	40.0%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	2	10	17	13	17	15	28
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	12.5%	0.0%	33.3%	75.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.