SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for North Carolina, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	335	335	335	335	335	335	335	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	335	335	335	335	335	335	335	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	314	314	314	314	314	314	314	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	314	314	314	314	314	314	314	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	766	766	766	766	766	766	766	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	766	766	766	766	766	766	766	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	14	14	14	14	14	14	14	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	14	14	14	14	14	14	14	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	1,415	1,514	1,606	1,657	1,719	1,766	1,800	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	1,415	1,514	1,606	1,657	1,719	1,766	1,800	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	577	577	577	577	577	577	577	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	577	577	577	577	577	577	577	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	28	28	28	28	28	28	28	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	28	28	28	28	28	28	28	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	361	361	361	361	361	361	361	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	361	361	361	361	361	361	361	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	98.4%	98.4%	98.4%	98.4%	98.4%	98.4%	98.4%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
		Data Quality	Combined	99.2%	99.2%	99.2%	99.2%	99.2%	99.2%	99.2%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	778	810	890	934	973	1,003	1,028
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	970	986	1,068	1,080	1,093	1,108	1,066
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	3,967	4,093	3,908	3,725	3,628	2,337	2,047
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	350	487	403	517	393	393
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	652	592	489	405	518	394	394
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	633	580	547	481	468	398	372
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	534	502	463	408	416	330	314
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	36	35	43	313	28	30	23
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	34	30	38	191	26	26	21
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	3.2%	20.7%	76.7%	19.5%	96.4%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	45.2%	86.2%	95.3%	61.7%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	0.0%	24.1%	95.3%	24.6%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	33	37	38	44	29	29	13
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	30	34	35	39	29	25	12
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$327,766	$366,601	$337,068	$789,611	$232,933	$111,074	$55,652
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	82.0%	41.9%	46.2%	33.3%	36.5%	25.0%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	40.0%	44.1%	41.1%	45.0%	32.9%	36.0%	24.7%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	24.6%	10.8%	14.0%	19.0%	21.2%	67.2%	90.1%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	4	1	4	6	6	1	2
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	13.9%	17.1%	11.6%	8.3%	75.0%	80.0%	82.6%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	73.7%	86.0%	81.6%	57.2%	93.5%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	57.7%	89.2%	88.2%	64.3%	96.8%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	99.7%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
		Goal	Combined	99.7%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	89.8%	91.1%	91.5%	93.1%	94.5%	97.1%	98.1%
		Review Indicator	Combined	89.8%	91.1%	91.5%	93.1%	94.5%	97.1%	98.1%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	99.7%	100.0%	100.0%	95.9%	99.7%	99.9%	99.9%
		Review Indicator	Combined	99.7%	100.0%	100.0%	95.9%	99.7%	99.9%	99.9%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	75.7%	78.3%	82.9%	87.5%	90.9%	93.5%	96.1%
		Informational Only	Combined	75.7%	78.3%	82.9%	87.5%	90.9%	93.5%	96.1%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	87.0%	87.8%	89.4%	91.4%	93.2%	95.1%	97.0%
C		Informational Only	Combined	87.0%	87.8%	89.4%	91.4%	93.2%	95.1%	97.0%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	83.9%	84.4%	85.9%	86.9%	88.6%	89.4%	89.8%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	17	10	5	4	8	0	0
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	17	10	5	4	8	0	0
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	0	1	1	1	1	1
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	99.1%	98.7%	99.7%	100.0%	99.4%	100.0%	100.0%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	13.8%	20.0%	18.1%	21.2%	18.0%	18.0%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	100.0%	75.0%	33.3%	60.0%	0.0%	100.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	6.6%	5.7%	6.9%	33.1%	4.8%	6.3%	6.0%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	2.4%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.5%	0.3%	0.4%	3.0%	0.4%	0.0%	0.1%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.1%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	87.9%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	67.0%	57.5%	62.8%	62.1%	63.8%	66.7%	70.1%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	8.3%	0.0%	25.0%	25.0%	20.0%	16.7%	0.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	13.4%	12.4%	9.5%	7.9%	2.6%	3.1%	0.0%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	33	37	38	44	29	29	13
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	95.7%	89.7%	85.7%	88.6%	96.6%	84.0%	100.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.