SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Nebraska, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	116	116	116	116	116	116	116	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	116	116	116	116	116	116	116	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	104	104	104	104	104	104	104	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	104	104	104	104	104	104	104	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	143	143	143	143	143	143	143	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	143	143	143	143	143	143	143	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	348	392	413	334	296	265	240	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	348	392	413	334	296	265	240	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	72	72	72	72	72	72	72	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	72	72	72	72	72	72	72	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	63	63	63	63	63	63	63	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	63	63	63	63	63	63	63	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	81.4%	81.4%	81.4%	81.4%	81.4%	81.4%	81.4%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	91.6%	91.6%	91.6%	91.6%	91.6%	91.6%	91.6%
		Data Quality	Combined	91.6%	91.6%	91.6%	91.6%	91.6%	91.6%	91.6%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	142	134	155	139	111	121	127
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	161	162	175	153	123	141	147
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	55	31	39	25	42	18	25
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	17	9	9	13	14	13
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	91	100	30	28	34	38	37
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	21	17	24	23	24	39	41
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	20	15	20	20	19	27	35
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	1	7	4	10	8	7	9
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	1	7	4	10	8	7	9
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	100.0%	25.0%	90.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	100.0%	75.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	100.0%	100.0%	90.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	34	17	17	19	11	17	10
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	20	12	11	13	9	16	10
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$38,200	$147,000	$15,200	$397,000	$12,500	$300,119	$233,363
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	4	4	4	4	4	4	4	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	350.0%	175.0%	120.0%	100.0%	83.3%	100.0%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	225.0%	266.7%	175.0%	100.0%	85.7%	85.7%	100.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	7.7%	0.0%	8.3%	0.0%	3.2%	0.0%	0.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	3	8	2	3	18	6	15
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	100.0%	85.7%	75.0%	20.0%	12.5%	14.3%	0.0%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0 / 0	0.0%	74.5%	78.8%	72.0%	86.2%	64.3%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	100.0%	69.0%	83.3%	79.5%	70.5%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	95.1%	97.2%	97.2%	100.0%	100.0%	97.4%	97.4%
		Goal	Combined	95.1%	98.1%	98.1%	100.0%	100.0%	97.4%	97.4%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	85.8%	89.0%	93.7%	96.8%	96.7%	96.8%	95.2%
		Review Indicator	Combined	85.9%	89.8%	93.7%	96.8%	98.4%	96.8%	95.2%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	91.4%	96.6%	97.6%	62.4%	74.8%	88.8%	98.6%
		Review Indicator	Combined	92.3%	96.7%	97.6%	63.2%	75.8%	89.6%	98.6%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	79.7%	85.1%	88.9%	93.3%	95.6%	97.1%	97.9%
		Informational Only	Combined	80.6%	85.9%	89.0%	93.3%	95.7%	97.1%	97.9%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	77.6%	82.9%	86.2%	89.2%	93.2%	93.8%	94.5%
C		Informational Only	Combined	79.0%	84.3%	86.9%	89.2%	93.2%	93.8%	94.5%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	8.9%	9.9%	10.7%	8.9%	8.1%	7.4%	6.9%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	24	16	4	8	11	18	13
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	24	16	4	8	11	18	13
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	2	2	2	2	2	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	80.0%	92.9%	95.1%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	2.4%	4.1%	4.4%	7.4%	6.2%	6.3%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	20.0%	33.3%	0.0%	9.1%	16.7%	0.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0.0%	100.0%	100.0%	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.9%	3.4%	2.6%	5.2%	3.4%	2.6%	2.6%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.9%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.9%	0.0%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	2.1%	0.0%	2.8%	1.4%	1.4%	1.4%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.7%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	100.0%	75.0%	40.0%	100.0%	40.0%	80.0%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	40.0%	66.7%	20.0%	42.9%	40.0%	60.0%	60.0%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	28.6%	40.0%	66.7%	30.8%	31.2%	40.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	42.9%	35.3%	28.6%	25.0%	25.0%	26.7%	29.4%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	24	12	12	11	4	8	6
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	40.0%	60.0%	33.3%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.