SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for New Jersey, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	305	305	305	305	305	305	305	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	305	305	305	305	305	305	305	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	292	292	292	292	292	292	292	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	292	292	292	292	292	292	292	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	1,022	1,022	1,022	1,022	1,022	1,022	1,022	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	1,022	1,022	1,022	1,022	1,022	1,022	1,022	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	29	29	29	29	29	29	29	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	29	29	29	29	29	29	29	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	131	156	184	176	158	135	133	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	131	156	184	176	158	135	133	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	309	309	309	309	309	309	309	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	309	309	309	309	309	309	309	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	62	62	62	62	62	62	62	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	62	62	62	62	62	62	62	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	142	142	142	142	142	142	142	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	142	142	142	142	142	142	142	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	80.2%	80.2%	80.2%	80.2%	80.2%	80.2%	80.2%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	35.0%	35.0%	35.0%	35.0%	35.0%	35.0%	35.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	87.0%	87.0%	87.0%	87.0%	87.0%	87.0%	87.0%
		Data Quality	Combined	72.9%	72.9%	72.9%	72.9%	72.9%	72.9%	72.9%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	206	234	338	337	334	396	336
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	256	269	404	392	377	450	377
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	116	83	93	54	70	15	14
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	109	109	86	84	85	109
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	122	129	135	124	127	124	147
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	84	143	165	204	174	208	179
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	66	93	108	130	111	124	148
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	90	68	88	80	53	39	39
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	66	47	71	59	43	28	31
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	100.0%	90.9%	90.9%	88.8%	84.9%	79.5%	94.9%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	0.0%	36.4%	79.5%	88.8%	88.7%	97.4%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	0.0%	36.4%	77.3%	87.5%	84.9%	97.4%	97.4%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	282	334	368	390	255	276	227
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	178	213	234	243	181	195	164
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$4,409,660	$3,828,450	$7,120,451	$11,854,225	$10,802,758	$4,669,763	$2,767,365
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	223.8%	285.7%	400.0%	253.8%	200.0%	78.6%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	252.2%	204.2%	221.4%	243.5%	126.9%	107.1%	60.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	1.6%	1.3%	3.6%	1.6%	4.0%	1.2%	0.8%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	35	54	60	57	54	43	38
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	95.6%	83.8%	40.9%	41.2%	37.7%	20.5%	7.7%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	34.7%	58.0%	62.0%	64.5%	76.5%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	80.9%	87.6%	86.3%	84.1%	73.9%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	74.4%	86.7%	86.7%	85.7%	85.7%	88.1%	88.1%
		Goal	Combined	76.6%	87.5%	87.5%	86.4%	86.4%	89.5%	89.5%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	65.8%	74.0%	78.5%	81.7%	87.2%	85.8%	87.2%
		Review Indicator	Combined	67.1%	74.9%	79.5%	82.4%	88.4%	87.0%	87.9%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	67.9%	78.9%	88.6%	28.1%	48.5%	69.4%	80.8%
		Review Indicator	Combined	69.2%	79.2%	89.1%	29.5%	52.8%	72.8%	84.0%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	49.2%	60.5%	76.0%	84.3%	86.1%	92.9%	94.4%
		Informational Only	Combined	50.8%	61.4%	76.8%	84.6%	87.3%	93.3%	96.6%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	60.7%	58.2%	63.1%	68.8%	74.8%	83.7%	88.6%
C		Informational Only	Combined	61.5%	58.8%	64.1%	69.5%	75.5%	84.0%	89.1%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	9.4%	7.4%	6.7%	6.0%	5.6%	4.5%	3.8%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	85	103	51	54	54	48	39
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	85	103	51	54	54	48	39
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	2	2	2	2	0	1	1
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	66.7%	72.2%	71.6%	76.8%	79.1%	87.9%	88.6%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	12.1%	8.7%	5.1%	5.0%	4.8%	9.5%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	7.7%	2.6%	2.6%	2.8%	13.5%	16.1%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	15.1%	9.8%	16.7%	14.4%	10.5%	7.9%	7.9%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.7%	0.0%	0.7%	0.3%	0.0%	0.3%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.7%	0.9%	0.9%	0.4%	0.5%	0.3%	0.5%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	59.3%	53.9%	49.5%	41.7%	28.0%	26.2%	31.1%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	70.0%	66.7%	66.7%	72.2%	75.7%	82.6%	76.2%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	50.0%	47.4%	34.4%	31.8%	31.2%	23.2%	22.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	8.2%	11.0%	15.6%	17.2%	24.2%	30.6%	37.5%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	282	334	368	390	255	276	227
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	91.2%	97.3%	98.6%	98.6%	91.7%	95.5%	82.9%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.