SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for New Mexico, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	164	164	164	164	164	164	164	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	168	168	168	168	168	168	168	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	161	161	161	161	161	161	161	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	162	162	162	162	162	162	162	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	513	513	513	513	513	513	513	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	513	513	513	513	513	513	513	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	16	16	16	16	16	16	16	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	16	16	16	16	16	16	16	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	248	276	301	184	162	143	115	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	248	276	301	184	162	143	115	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	301	301	301	301	301	301	301	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	303	303	303	303	303	303	303	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	68	68	68	68	68	68	68	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	68	68	68	68	68	68	68	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	72	72	72	72	72	72	72	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	72	72	72	72	72	72	72	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	90.8%	90.8%	90.8%	90.8%	90.8%	90.8%	90.8%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	31.8%	31.8%	31.8%	31.8%	31.8%	31.8%	31.8%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	88.0%	88.0%	88.0%	88.0%	88.0%	88.0%	88.0%
		Data Quality	Combined	81.5%	81.5%	81.5%	81.5%	81.5%	81.5%	81.5%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	111	140	116	113	91	117	101
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	133	172	156	118	101	119	115
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	130	243	233	24	23	12	11
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	71	74	66	65	116	65
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	76	71	74	67	66	117	67
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	75	21	66	65	60	72	78
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	70	21	51	64	54	68	67
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	2	2	2	7	16	16	14
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	2	2	2	7	16	15	12
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	50.0%	28.6%	56.2%	100.0%	71.4%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	50.0%	57.1%	93.8%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	50.0%	42.9%	93.8%	100.0%	64.3%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	44	41	48	78	58	62	66
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	40	37	39	73	57	56	49
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$977,125	$343,427	$381,226	$1,218,458	$453,397	$478,793	$359,199
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	11	11	11	11	11	11	11	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	100.0%	75.0%	233.3%	600.0%	60.9%	71.4%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	100.0%	150.0%	75.0%	233.3%	600.0%	69.6%	72.7%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	89.7%	73.0%	2.8%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	1	2	0	1	5	7
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	100.0%	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	37.5%	75.0%	35.7%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	17.3%	24.5%	45.7%	70.4%	61.6%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	17.0%	31.8%	79.5%	89.4%	51.4%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	94.1%	92.6%	92.6%	92.7%	92.7%	98.1%	98.1%
		Goal	Combined	94.2%	93.4%	93.4%	90.9%	90.9%	97.5%	97.5%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	64.5%	77.2%	85.2%	83.2%	87.3%	91.6%	92.2%
		Review Indicator	Combined	64.7%	77.2%	85.1%	82.0%	86.5%	91.2%	91.8%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	86.6%	91.7%	99.0%	29.7%	53.4%	67.3%	80.4%
		Review Indicator	Combined	86.6%	91.7%	99.0%	29.7%	53.4%	67.6%	80.5%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	56.3%	61.1%	77.5%	76.7%	84.5%	84.5%	91.5%
		Informational Only	Combined	56.3%	61.1%	77.5%	76.7%	84.5%	85.3%	92.2%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	52.9%	51.4%	51.4%	44.7%	43.5%	32.9%	32.8%
C		Informational Only	Combined	52.9%	51.4%	51.4%	44.7%	43.5%	33.1%	33.0%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	16.0%	9.4%	8.3%	4.9%	4.2%	3.5%	2.9%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	37	96	72	22	7	2	2
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	38	98	73	22	7	4	3
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	1	2	2	2
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	90.6%	100.0%	100.0%	74.5%	90.8%	80.1%	96.2%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	15.5%	16.1%	16.3%	16.8%	40.4%	28.8%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0 / 0	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	50.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	1.2%	1.2%	1.2%	3.7%	7.3%	7.3%	7.3%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.6%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	1.2%	1.2%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.2%	0.4%	0.2%	0.0%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	7.1%	8.3%	11.1%	27.3%	50.0%	61.1%	47.1%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	86.4%	100.0%	100.0%	64.3%	46.7%	50.0%	62.5%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	33.3%	60.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	40.0%	50.0%	50.0%	44.4%	25.0%	20.7%	20.0%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	44	41	48	78	58	61	66
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	100.0%	33.3%	100.0%	53.8%	53.8%	44.4%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.