SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Nevada, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	61	61	61	61	61	61	61	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	61	61	61	61	61	61	61	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	61	61	61	61	61	61	61	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	61	61	61	61	61	61	61	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	44	44	44	44	44	44	44	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	44	44	44	44	44	44	44	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	7	7	8	5	4	2	3	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	7	7	8	5	4	2	3	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	37	37	37	37	37	37	37	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	37	37	37	37	37	37	37	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	8	8	8	8	8	8	8	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	10	10	10	10	10	10	10	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	10	10	10	10	10	10	10	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	84.4%	84.4%	84.4%	84.4%	84.4%	84.4%	84.4%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	87.5%	87.5%	87.5%	87.5%	87.5%	87.5%	87.5%
		Data Quality	Combined	77.8%	77.8%	77.8%	77.8%	77.8%	77.8%	77.8%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	37	43	66	56	53	61	46
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	46	51	80	63	57	77	47
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	57	82	70	40	54	36	20
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	3	3	2	2	2	2
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	1	3	3	3	3	4	5
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	5	9	7	1	7	0	0
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	5	9	7	1	7	0	0
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	7	10	7	19	8	2	1
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	7	9	6	9	7	2	1
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	100.0%	75.0%	100.0%	89.5%	87.5%	50.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	9	5	9	6	7	1	0
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	7	5	9	5	6	1	0
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$36,800	$15,000	$42,600	$51,888	$447,000	$4,000	$0
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	400.0%	266.7%	200.0%	300.0%	100.0%	50.0%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	700.0%	400.0%	266.7%	166.7%	200.0%	100.0%	25.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.6%	0.9%	0.2%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	6	10	1	11	7	6	9
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	42.9%	60.0%	57.1%	5.3%	25.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	5.2%	30.0%	20.5%	13.3%	14.0%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	7.7%	71.4%	28.6%	0.0%	0 / 0
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	88.6%	92.3%	92.3%	90.9%	90.9%	87.9%	87.9%
		Goal	Combined	88.6%	92.3%	92.3%	90.9%	90.9%	87.9%	87.9%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	68.8%	79.4%	77.8%	82.5%	90.5%	83.9%	85.5%
		Review Indicator	Combined	68.8%	79.4%	77.8%	82.5%	90.5%	83.9%	85.5%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	90.9%	90.9%	90.9%	54.5%	63.6%	72.7%	72.7%
		Review Indicator	Combined	90.9%	90.9%	90.9%	54.5%	63.6%	72.7%	72.7%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	90.9%	90.9%	90.9%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
		Informational Only	Combined	90.9%	90.9%	90.9%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	69.6%	71.7%	80.9%	85.1%	83.0%	83.3%	81.2%
C		Informational Only	Combined	69.6%	71.7%	80.9%	85.1%	83.0%	83.3%	81.2%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	3.2%	3.2%	3.2%	3.2%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	14	20	5	11	5	18	28
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	14	20	5	11	5	18	28
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	0	0	1	1
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	92.3%	75.0%	91.3%	87.2%	74.5%	74.5%	94.2%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	5.0%	3.9%	3.1%	3.1%	2.7%	2.9%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	8.2%	11.5%	8.2%	9.8%	9.8%	3.3%	1.6%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	1.6%	0.0%	1.6%	1.6%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	4.5%	4.5%	2.3%	6.8%	2.3%	0.0%	0.0%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	2.3%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	80.0%	100.0%	100.0%	0 / 0
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	25.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0 / 0	0 / 0
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	12.5%	30.0%	28.6%	40.0%	28.6%	0.0%	0.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	46.7%	47.6%	27.8%	14.3%	0.0%	11.1%	50.0%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	9	5	9	6	7	1	0
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	80.0%	75.0%	100.0%	83.3%	100.0%	0 / 0

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.