SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - CAA Data for New York, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	442	442	442	442	442	442	442	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	443	443	443	443	443	443	443	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	434	434	434	434	434	434	434	n/a
		Data Quality	Combined	435	435	435	435	435	435	435	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	2,596	2,596	2,596	2,596	2,596	2,596	2,596	n/a
	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	2,596	2,596	2,596	2,596	2,596	2,596	2,596	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	83	83	83	83	83	83	83	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	83	83	83	83	83	83	83	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	1,300	1,508	1,790	1,597	1,860	1,997	2,353	n/a
		Informational Only	Combined	1,300	1,508	1,790	1,597	1,860	1,997	2,353	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	783	783	783	783	783	783	783	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	783	783	783	783	783	783	783	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	178	178	178	178	178	178	178	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	178	178	178	178	178	178	178	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	639	639	639	639	639	639	639	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	639	639	639	639	639	639	639	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	96.0%	96.0%	96.0%	96.0%	96.0%	96.0%	96.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	81.2%	81.2%	81.2%	81.2%	81.2%	81.2%	81.2%
		Data Quality	Combined	76.5%	76.5%	76.5%	76.5%	76.5%	76.5%	76.5%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	464	438	437	405	457	420	431
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	517	484	474	434	475	429	440
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	3,435	3,451	3,630	3,779	3,779	3,625	3,693
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	2,064	1,664	1,511	1,927	1,426	1,237
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	2,066	2,162	1,673	1,524	1,943	1,444	1,257
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	456	1,526	720	417	369	352	273
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	353	1,280	583	366	298	250	181
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	29	36	47	94	69	47	28
G	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	29	34	39	91	64	38	24
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0.0%	95.7%	100.0%	97.1%	97.9%	96.4%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0.0%	95.7%	100.0%	97.1%	97.9%	96.4%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	183	179	125	177	165	138	84
I	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	173	160	118	167	145	131	81
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$3,200,720	$5,250,359	$1,567,999	$3,029,967	$1,486,075	$1,399,875	$791,650
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	26.1%	28.9%	27.8%	14.7%	16.2%	12.6%
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	36.9%	25.6%	30.2%	28.0%	16.5%	19.0%	13.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.6%	0.0%	0.8%	0.0%	0.0%	2.5%	0.0%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	10	26	12	12	39	15	13
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	100.0%	97.2%	53.2%	68.1%	53.6%	51.1%	42.9%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	42.4%	23.2%	26.3%	43.4%	49.6%
B	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	62.6%	53.3%	67.9%	87.7%	66.4%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	100.0%	99.5%	99.5%	99.5%	99.5%	98.8%	98.8%
		Goal	Combined	100.0%	99.5%	99.5%	99.8%	99.8%	99.1%	99.1%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	89.7%	92.1%	92.9%	93.8%	96.1%	96.2%	97.8%
		Review Indicator	Combined	89.7%	92.4%	93.1%	94.1%	96.1%	96.2%	97.6%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) ¹	Review Indicator	State	77.7%	88.5%	99.1%	21.1%	44.3%	60.8%	77.5%
		Review Indicator	Combined	78.5%	88.8%	99.1%	21.7%	45.5%	61.7%	79.2%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	43.7%	58.6%	79.1%	84.1%	97.9%	98.1%	98.1%
		Informational Only	Combined	44.2%	59.0%	79.3%	84.1%	97.9%	98.1%	98.1%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	35.9%	36.2%	41.4%	49.7%	53.2%	55.7%	59.2%
C		Informational Only	Combined	36.5%	36.6%	41.7%	50.0%	53.4%	55.9%	59.4%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	29.8%	27.4%	22.2%	19.3%	21.6%	22.5%	25.9%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	1	30	8	34	10	11	5
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	Combined	1	30	8	34	10	11	5
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	1	1	1	1	1	0	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	96.5%	93.3%	93.5%	93.2%	93.2%	100.0%	95.1%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	62.2%	67.9%	72.1%	86.4%	82.6%	86.2%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	62.5%	66.7%	25.0%	62.5%	50.0%	44.4%
		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	100.0%	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	3.8%	4.8%	4.3%	6.1%	5.9%	5.2%	4.3%
A		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.2%	0.0%	0.0%	0.5%	0.5%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.2%	0.3%	0.5%	2.4%	1.2%	0.3%	0.1%
B		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	66.7%	61.3%	56.7%	55.0%	46.7%	57.6%	42.3%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	40.7%	47.8%	54.0%	50.0%	44.4%	51.3%	65.9%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	50.0%	83.3%	84.6%	70.0%	50.0%	54.5%	50.0%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	65.0%	62.0%	50.4%	35.8%	30.2%	31.9%	35.0%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	183	179	125	177	165	138	84
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	92.2%	95.5%	96.6%	96.2%	98.0%	100.0%	94.4%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.