Recent Additions | Contact Us

• You are here: EPA Home
• Compliance and Enforcement
• ECHO
• Search Data
• Search Results

State Review Framework - CAA Data for Ohio, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors (Current)	Data Quality	State	609	609	609	609	609	609	609	n/a
			Combined	609	609	609	609	609	609	609	n/a
	Title V Universe: AFS Operating Majors with Air Program Code = V (Current)	Data Quality	State	606	606	606	606	606	606	606	n/a
			Combined	606	606	606	606	606	606	606	n/a
B	Source Count: Synthetic Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	892	892	892	892	892	892	892	n/a
			Combined	892	892	892	892	892	892	892	n/a
	Source Count: NESHAP Minors (Current)	Data Quality	State	69	69	69	69	69	69	69	n/a
			Combined	69	69	69	69	69	69	69	n/a
	Source Count: Active Minor facilities or otherwise FedRep, not including NESHAP Part 61 (Current)	Informational Only	State	1,607	1,820	2,155	2,338	2,181	2,020	1,980	n/a
			Combined	1,607	1,820	2,155	2,338	2,181	2,020	1,980	n/a
C	CAA Subprogram Designations: NSPS (Current)	Data Quality	State	567	567	567	567	567	567	567	n/a
			Combined	567	567	567	567	567	567	567	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: NESHAP (Current)	Data Quality	State	116	116	116	116	116	116	116	n/a
			Combined	116	116	116	116	116	116	116	n/a
	CAA Subprogram Designations: MACT (Current)	Data Quality	State	491	491	491	491	491	491	491	n/a
			Combined	491	491	491	491	491	491	491	n/a
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NSPS facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	99.8%	99.8%	99.8%	99.8%	99.8%	99.8%	99.8%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent NESHAP facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	CAA Subpart Designations: Percent MACT facilities with FCEs conducted after 10/1/2005	Data Quality	State	99.9%	99.9%	99.9%	99.9%	99.9%	99.9%	99.9%
			Combined	99.7%	99.7%	99.7%	99.7%	99.7%	99.7%	99.7%
D	Compliance Monitoring: Sources with FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	490	412	481	479	552	514	516
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of FCEs (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	623	492	549	541	606	563	538
	Compliance Monitoring: Number of PCEs (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	2,343	1,410	1,469	1,527	1,605	1,428	1,268
E	Historical Non-Compliance Counts (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	692	784	716	552	494	460
			Combined	611	726	784	719	555	497	463
F	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	287	217	270	251	226	337	365
	Informal Enforcement Actions: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	251	191	241	217	189	297	304
G	HPV: Number of New Pathways (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	189	114	152	208	98	57	49
	HPV: Number of New Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	167	106	139	180	89	55	43
H	HPV Day Zero Pathway Discovery date: Percent DZs with discovery	Data Quality	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.7%	1.0%	1.0%	0.0%	0.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violating Pollutants: Percent DZs	Data Quality	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	HPV Day Zero Pathway Violation Type Code(s): Percent DZs with HPV Violation Type Code(s)	Data Quality	State	5.3%	3.8%	0.7%	3.8%	55.1%	84.2%	93.9%
I	Formal Action: Number Issued (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	46	41	53	83	40	87	44
	Formal Action: Number of Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	42	40	48	81	39	86	44
J	Assessed Penalties: Total Dollar Amount (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$1,499,457	$965,122	$750,378	$1,574,635	$2,224,943	$1,653,853	$1,308,165
K	Major Sources Missing CMS Policy Applicability (Current)	Review Indicator	State	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	n/a
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of HPVs/Number of NC Sources (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	60.3%	52.2%	48.0%	61.5%	46.2%	44.6%
			Combined	83.1%	61.7%	57.6%	55.2%	71.8%	63.2%	62.6%
B	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - % Without Pass/Fail Results (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.1%	0.1%	0.0%	0.0%	0.1%	0.0%	0.0%
	Stack Test Results at Federally-Reportable Sources - Number of Failures (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	100	132	110	165	81	101	61
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent HPVs Entered ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	89.9%	77.2%	44.7%	33.7%	53.1%	54.4%	63.3%
B	Percent Compliance Monitoring related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	11.5%	42.4%	42.3%	44.9%	54.4%
	Percent Enforcement related MDR actions reported ≤ 60 Days After Designation, Timely Entry (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	15.6%	55.9%	64.9%	43.5%	49.3%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	CMS Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage (2 FY CMS Cycle)	Goal	State	86.0%	91.9%	91.9%	92.8%	92.8%	97.2%	97.2%
			Combined	86.8%	92.1%	92.1%	92.8%	92.8%	97.2%	97.2%
	CAA Major Full Compliance Evaluation (FCE) Coverage(most recent 2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	82.2%	78.0%	81.4%	85.8%	91.0%	91.9%	92.6%
			Combined	82.6%	78.1%	81.5%	85.8%	91.0%	91.9%	92.6%
B	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (5 FY CMS Cycle) 1	Review Indicator	State	98.8%	88.4%	94.6%	45.5%	74.5%	88.8%	94.5%
			Combined	98.8%	88.4%	94.6%	45.5%	74.5%	88.8%	94.5%
	CAA Synthetic Minor 80% Sources (SM-80) FCE Coverage (last full 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	36.5%	46.4%	56.4%	66.1%	74.2%	78.8%	84.5%
			Combined	36.6%	46.5%	56.6%	66.2%	74.3%	78.8%	84.5%
C	CAA Synthetic Minor FCE and reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	50.4%	58.7%	67.2%	75.0%	80.8%	83.9%	88.2%
			Combined	50.7%	59.1%	68.0%	75.3%	81.0%	84.1%	88.4%
D	CAA Minor FCE and Reported PCE Coverage (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	33.7%	37.8%	45.0%	48.7%	44.7%	40.5%	39.8%
E	Number of Sources with Unknown Compliance Status	Review Indicator	State	37	37	21	59	28	18	28
			Combined	37	37	21	59	28	18	28
F	CAA Stationary Source Investigations (last 5 FY)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
G	Review of Self-Certifications Completed (1 FY)	Goal	State	83.7%	93.2%	97.2%	98.1%	96.8%	98.9%	96.3%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Percent facilities in noncompliance that have had an FCE, stack test, or enforcement (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	56.7%	57.3%	48.5%	35.0%	32.0%	31.7%
	Percent facilities that have had a failed stack test and have noncompliance status (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	46.9%	52.3%	45.8%	29.7%	26.3%	15.2%
			EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	100.0%	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Major Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	13.6%	8.4%	9.5%	14.4%	8.7%	5.4%	4.9%
			EPA	1.1%	1.5%	2.1%	1.8%	2.3%	3.6%	2.5%
B	High Priority Violation Discovery Rate - Per Synthetic Minor Source (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	5.0%	3.8%	5.8%	6.7%	2.9%	1.6%	1.2%
			EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Percent Formal Actions With Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	95.0%	95.8%	85.7%	94.1%	93.8%	58.3%	80.0%
D	Percent Informal Enforcement Actions Without Prior HPV - Majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	6.7%	5.6%	1.3%	22.2%	29.2%	53.3%	53.3%
E	Percentage of Sources with Failed Stack Test Actions that received HPV listing - Majors and Synthetic Minors (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	51.1%	48.1%	50.0%	48.6%	35.9%	34.4%	36.4%
10. Timely and Appropriate Action. Degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent HPVs not meeting timeliness goals (2 FY)	Review Indicator	State	52.2%	57.1%	55.3%	54.0%	54.8%	67.6%	65.4%
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. Degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No Activity Indicator - Actions with Penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	42	32	34	39	28	76	34
B	Percent Actions at HPVs With Penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	81.2%	88.5%	87.5%	92.3%	87.0%	23.6%	93.8%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011    Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.


Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ The current CMS Cycle for SM80s started with FY07; therefore, metric 5B1 includes number of FYs since FY07 through selected FY. Goal percentages expected to increase with selected FY until CMS Cycle completion in FY11, e.g., 20%- FY07,40% -FY08, etc.

• EPA Home
• Privacy and Security Notice
• Contact Us