Jump to main content.


State Review Framework - CWA Data for Connecticut, State Multi-Year Report

Help Page
Metric Metric Type Agency 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
AActive facility universe: NPDES major individual permits (Current)Data QualityCombined96969696969696n/a
Active facility universe: NPDES major general permits (Current)Data QualityCombined0000000n/a
Active facility universe: NPDES non-major individual permits (Current)Data QualityCombined70707070707070n/a
Active facility universe: NPDES non-major general permits (Current)Data QualityCombined153153153153153153153n/a
BMajor individual permits: correctly coded limits 1GoalCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 097.1%100.0%97.9%
Major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on MRs expected (Forms/Forms) (1 Qtr) 2GoalCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 096.9%98.8%98.3%98.3%
Major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on DMRs expected (Permits/Permits) (1 Qtr) 3GoalCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 0100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%
Major individual permits: manual RNC/SNC override rate (1 FY)Data QualityCombined0.0%0.0%0.0%4.3%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CNon-major individual permits: correctly coded limits 4Informational OnlyCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 095.3%100.0%91.2%
Non-major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on DMRs expected (Forms/Forms) (1 Qtr) 5Informational OnlyCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 085.5%88.9%93.0%93.9%
Non-major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on DMRs expected (Permits/Permits) (1 Qtr) 6Informational OnlyCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 088.4%92.2%93.8%100.0%
DViolations at non-majors: noncompliance rate (1 FY)Informational OnlyCombined2.9%34.3%35.7%41.4%22.9%17.1%25.7%
Violations at non-majors: noncompliance rate in the annual noncompliance report (ANCR)(1 CY) 7Informational OnlyCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 022.4%26.0%13.0%0 / 0
Violations at non-majors: DMR non-receipt (3 FY)Informational OnlyCombined0000000
EInformal actions: number of major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState2100000
EPA0000000
Informal actions: number of actions at major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState2100000
EPA0000000
Informal actions: number of non-major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState0000000
EPA0000000
Informal actions: number of actions at non-major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState0000000
EPA0000000
FFormal actions: number of major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState5100153
EPA0010232
Formal actions: number of actions at major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState5100142
EPA0010232
Formal actions: number of non-major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState110032325
EPA1001010
Formal actions: number of actions at non-major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState110032225
EPA1001010
GPenalties: total number of penalties (1 FY)Data QualityState001042526
EPA0011120
Penalties: total penalties (1 FY)Data QualityState$0$0$425,000$0$244,083$2,564,783$1,013,135
EPA$0$0$425,000$17,000$71,000$596,000$0
Penalties: total collected pursuant to civil judicial actions (3 FY)Data QualityState$142,500$0$425,000$425,000$425,000$1,646,000$2,048,300
EPA$142,500$0$425,000$425,000$425,000$596,000$596,000
Penalties: total collected pursuant to administrative actions (3 FY)Informational OnlyState$0$0$0$0$0$918,783$1,529,618
EPA$0$0$0$17,000$17,000$17,000$0
No activity indicator - total number of penalties (1 FY)Data QualityState$0$0$425,000$0$244,083$2,564,783$1,013,135
EPA$0$0$425,000$17,000$71,000$596,000$0
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
AActions linked to violations: major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState0.0%0.0%0 / 00 / 00.0%0.0%0.0%
EPA0 / 00 / 00.0%0 / 050.0%0.0%0.0%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
AInspection coverage: NPDES majors (1 FY)GoalState85.4%82.3%77.1%75.0%78.1%87.5%80.2%
EPA4.2%2.1%5.2%3.1%3.1%4.2%0.0%
Combined85.4%84.4%81.2%78.1%78.1%87.5%80.2%
BInspection coverage: NPDES non-major individual permits (1 FY)GoalState44.1%39.7%50.0%48.5%47.1%58.8%58.8%
EPA0.0%0.0%1.5%2.9%0.0%1.5%0.0%
Combined44.1%39.7%51.5%51.5%47.1%60.3%58.8%
Inspection coverage: NPDES non-major general permits (1 FY)GoalState2.0%0.0%1.3%0.7%2.7%1.3%1.3%
EPA0.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Combined2.7%0.0%1.3%0.7%2.7%1.3%1.3%
CInspection coverage: NPDES other (not 5a or 5b) (1 FY)Informational OnlyState0.0%0.0%0.0%20.0%0.0%0.0%20.0%
EPA0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Combined0.0%0.0%0.0%20.0%0.0%0.0%20.0%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
ASingle-event violations at majors (1 FY)Review IndicatorCombined0000000
Single-event violations at non-majors (1 FY)Informational OnlyCombined0000000
BFacilities with unresolved compliance schedule violations (at end of FY)Data QualityCombined46.2%44.4%80.0%66.7%66.7%57.1%100.0%
CFacilities with unresolved permit schedule violations (at end of FY)Data QualityCombined0.0%9.1%7.7%10.5%5.6%10.0%9.1%
DPercentage major facilities with DMR violations (1 FY)Data QualityCombined72.9%74.0%78.1%77.1%76.0%74.0%76.0%
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
AMajor facilities in SNC (1 FY)Review IndicatorCombined17161722201512
SNC rate: percent majors in SNC (1 FY)Review IndicatorCombined17.7%16.7%17.7%22.9%20.8%15.6%12.5%
BWet weather SNC Metric(s) likely to be developed in the future.
10. Timely and appropriate action. degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
AMajor facilities without timely action (1 FY)GoalCombined12.5%13.5%10.4%7.3%14.6%9.4%9.4%
Download a comma delimited text file Download an excel file Report Generated on 6/30/2011   
Data Refresh Dates   

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.


Caveats:
0EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI

1 Metric 1B1 data is pulled manually for ICIS-NPDES states, and is available only for FY2008 through FY2010. Metric 1B1 data is programmed for PCS states, and is available for all FYs. Because of the mix of manual and programmed data, the percentage shown in national average column reflects the national average for PCS or ICIS-NPDES, and not the true national average.
2 Metric 1B2 data is pulled manually, and is available only for FY2007 through FY2010
3 Metric 1B3 data is pulled manually, and is available only for FY2007 through FY2010
4 Metric 1C1 data is pulled manually for ICIS-NPDES states, and is available only for FY2008 through FY2010. Metric 1C1 data is programmed for PCS states, and is available for all FYs.
5 Metric 1C2 data is pulled manually, and is available only for FY2007 through FY2010
6 Metric 1C3 data is pulled manually, and is available only for FY2007 through FY2010
7 Metric 1D2 data is pulled manually, and is available only for CY2007 through CY2009.

Jump to main content.