Recent Additions | Contact Us

• You are here: EPA Home
• Compliance and Enforcement
• ECHO
• Search Data
• Search Results

State Review Framework - CWA Data for District Of Columbia, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Active facility universe: NPDES major individual permits (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	5	5	5	5	5	5	5	n/a
	Active facility universe: NPDES major general permits (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a
	Active facility universe: NPDES non-major individual permits (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	6	6	6	6	6	6	6	n/a
	Active facility universe: NPDES non-major general permits (Current)	Data Quality	Combined	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	n/a
B	Major individual permits: correctly coded limits 1	Goal	Combined	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	80.0%	100.0%	75.0%
	Major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on MRs expected (Forms/Forms) (1 Qtr) 2	Goal	Combined	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	5.3%	82.4%	100.0%	100.0%
	Major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on DMRs expected (Permits/Permits) (1 Qtr) 3	Goal	Combined	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	100.0%	80.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	Major individual permits: manual RNC/SNC override rate (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	0.0%	0.0%	33.3%	50.0%	66.7%	66.7%	75.0%
C	Non-major individual permits: correctly coded limits 4	Informational Only	Combined	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	75.0%	100.0%	100.0%
	Non-major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on DMRs expected (Forms/Forms) (1 Qtr) 5	Informational Only	Combined	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	96.2%	80.0%	100.0%	92.5%
	Non-major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on DMRs expected (Permits/Permits) (1 Qtr) 6	Informational Only	Combined	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	70.0%	75.0%	100.0%	100.0%
D	Violations at non-majors: noncompliance rate (1 FY)	Informational Only	Combined	50.0%	66.7%	50.0%	50.0%	66.7%	83.3%	50.0%
	Violations at non-majors: noncompliance rate in the annual noncompliance report (ANCR)(1 CY) 7	Informational Only	Combined	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	88.9%	60.0%	42.9%	0 / 0
	Violations at non-majors: DMR non-receipt (3 FY)	Informational Only	Combined	6	5	4	0	0	0	0
E	Informal actions: number of major facilities (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
			EPA	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
	Informal actions: number of actions at major facilities (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
			EPA	0	0	0	0	0	2	0
	Informal actions: number of non-major facilities (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
			EPA	0	0	0	0	0	1	0
	Informal actions: number of actions at non-major facilities (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
			EPA	0	0	0	0	0	1	0
F	Formal actions: number of major facilities (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
			EPA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Formal actions: number of actions at major facilities (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
			EPA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Formal actions: number of non-major facilities (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
			EPA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Formal actions: number of actions at non-major facilities (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
			EPA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
G	Penalties: total number of penalties (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
			EPA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Penalties: total penalties (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
			EPA	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
	Penalties: total collected pursuant to civil judicial actions (3 FY)	Data Quality	State	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
			EPA	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
	Penalties: total collected pursuant to administrative actions (3 FY)	Informational Only	State	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
			EPA	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
	No activity indicator - total number of penalties (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
			EPA	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Actions linked to violations: major facilities (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
			EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0.0%	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	Inspection coverage: NPDES majors (1 FY)	Goal	State	40.0%	20.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
			EPA	60.0%	40.0%	20.0%	100.0%	80.0%	80.0%	60.0%
			Combined	80.0%	40.0%	20.0%	100.0%	80.0%	80.0%	60.0%
B	Inspection coverage: NPDES non-major individual permits (1 FY)	Goal	State	75.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
			EPA	50.0%	0.0%	25.0%	25.0%	50.0%	0.0%	25.0%
			Combined	75.0%	0.0%	25.0%	25.0%	50.0%	0.0%	25.0%
	Inspection coverage: NPDES non-major general permits (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
			EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%
			Combined	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%
C	Inspection coverage: NPDES other (not 5a or 5b) (1 FY)	Informational Only	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
			EPA	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	33.3%	33.3%
			Combined	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	33.3%	33.3%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
A	Single-event violations at majors (1 FY)	Review Indicator	Combined	0	0	0	0	1	3	3
	Single-event violations at non-majors (1 FY)	Informational Only	Combined	0	0	0	0	1	1	2
B	Facilities with unresolved compliance schedule violations (at end of FY)	Data Quality	Combined	0.0%	0.0%	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
C	Facilities with unresolved permit schedule violations (at end of FY)	Data Quality	Combined	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
D	Percentage major facilities with DMR violations (1 FY)	Data Quality	Combined	60.0%	60.0%	40.0%	40.0%	60.0%	60.0%	40.0%
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	Major facilities in SNC (1 FY)	Review Indicator	Combined	2	3	2	2	1	1	2
	SNC rate: percent majors in SNC (1 FY)	Review Indicator	Combined	40.0%	60.0%	40.0%	40.0%	20.0%	20.0%	40.0%
B	Wet weather SNC	Metric(s) likely to be developed in the future.
10. Timely and appropriate action. degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Major facilities without timely action (1 FY)	Goal	Combined	20.0%	20.0%	40.0%	20.0%	40.0%	60.0%	40.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011    Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.


Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ Metric 1B1 data is pulled manually for ICIS-NPDES states, and is available only for FY2008 through FY2010. Metric 1B1 data is programmed for PCS states, and is available for all FYs. Because of the mix of manual and programmed data, the percentage shown in national average column reflects the national average for PCS or ICIS-NPDES, and not the true national average.
² Metric 1B2 data is pulled manually, and is available only for FY2007 through FY2010
³ Metric 1B3 data is pulled manually, and is available only for FY2007 through FY2010
⁴ Metric 1C1 data is pulled manually for ICIS-NPDES states, and is available only for FY2008 through FY2010. Metric 1C1 data is programmed for PCS states, and is available for all FYs.
⁵ Metric 1C2 data is pulled manually, and is available only for FY2007 through FY2010
⁶ Metric 1C3 data is pulled manually, and is available only for FY2007 through FY2010
⁷ Metric 1D2 data is pulled manually, and is available only for CY2007 through CY2009.

• EPA Home
• Privacy and Security Notice
• Contact Us