Jump to main content.


State Review Framework - CWA Data for Idaho, State Multi-Year Report

Help Page
Metric Metric Type Agency 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
AActive facility universe: NPDES major individual permits (Current)Data QualityCombined36363636363636n/a
Active facility universe: NPDES major general permits (Current)Data QualityCombined18181818181818n/a
Active facility universe: NPDES non-major individual permits (Current)Data QualityCombined119119119119119119119n/a
Active facility universe: NPDES non-major general permits (Current)Data QualityCombined193193193193193193193n/a
BMajor individual permits: correctly coded limits 1GoalCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0100.0%100.0%100.0%
Major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on MRs expected (Forms/Forms) (1 Qtr) 2GoalCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 095.4%94.1%100.0%100.0%
Major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on DMRs expected (Permits/Permits) (1 Qtr) 3GoalCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 097.2%94.3%91.7%100.0%
Major individual permits: manual RNC/SNC override rate (1 FY)Data QualityCombined0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%11.1%0.0%
CNon-major individual permits: correctly coded limits 4Informational OnlyCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 093.3%100.0%99.1%
Non-major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on DMRs expected (Forms/Forms) (1 Qtr) 5Informational OnlyCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 085.7%88.1%95.9%97.0%
Non-major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on DMRs expected (Permits/Permits) (1 Qtr) 6Informational OnlyCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 065.3%80.8%88.1%97.4%
DViolations at non-majors: noncompliance rate (1 FY)Informational OnlyCombined56.3%68.9%74.8%82.4%84.0%84.0%87.4%
Violations at non-majors: noncompliance rate in the annual noncompliance report (ANCR)(1 CY) 7Informational OnlyCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 077.6%79.7%57.7%0 / 0
Violations at non-majors: DMR non-receipt (3 FY)Informational OnlyCombined00032697470
EInformal actions: number of major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState0000000
EPA6711910414
Informal actions: number of actions at major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState0000000
EPA77121010414
Informal actions: number of non-major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState0000000
EPA31245238343143
Informal actions: number of actions at non-major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState0000000
EPA32245239353146
FFormal actions: number of major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState0000000
EPA0212122
Formal actions: number of actions at major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState0000000
EPA0222022
Formal actions: number of non-major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState0000000
EPA13393027424226
Formal actions: number of actions at non-major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState0000000
EPA13603820222423
GPenalties: total number of penalties (1 FY)Data QualityState0000000
EPA3332319212116
Penalties: total penalties (1 FY)Data QualityState$0$0$0$0$0$0$0
EPA$8,416$307,800$1,053,025$306,025$411,061$578,492$1,145,152
Penalties: total collected pursuant to civil judicial actions (3 FY)Data QualityState$0$0$0$0$0$0$0
EPA$0$0$895,000$895,000$1,080,000$185,000$1,000,000
Penalties: total collected pursuant to administrative actions (3 FY)Informational OnlyState$0$0$0$0$0$0$0
EPA$8,416$316,216$474,241$771,850$690,111$1,110,578$1,134,705
No activity indicator - total number of penalties (1 FY)Data QualityState$0$0$0$0$0$0$0
EPA$8,416$307,800$1,053,025$306,025$411,061$578,492$1,145,152
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
AActions linked to violations: major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
EPA0 / 00.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
AInspection coverage: NPDES majors (1 FY)GoalState35.8%32.1%39.6%39.6%32.1%22.6%34.0%
EPA32.1%39.6%39.6%11.3%45.3%22.6%20.8%
Combined62.3%62.3%69.8%49.1%67.9%43.4%49.1%
BInspection coverage: NPDES non-major individual permits (1 FY)GoalState2.6%0.9%2.6%6.0%21.6%18.1%15.5%
EPA3.4%4.3%6.0%25.9%19.8%6.0%9.5%
Combined6.0%5.2%9.5%30.2%40.5%24.1%23.3%
Inspection coverage: NPDES non-major general permits (1 FY)GoalState15.1%19.8%14.0%15.1%7.0%22.1%15.1%
EPA18.6%9.3%2.3%1.2%1.2%10.5%24.4%
Combined33.7%29.1%16.3%16.3%8.1%32.6%39.5%
CInspection coverage: NPDES other (not 5a or 5b) (1 FY)Informational OnlyState0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
EPA0.0%0.0%1.8%2.7%0.9%10.8%0.0%
Combined0.0%0.0%1.8%2.7%0.9%10.8%0.0%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
ASingle-event violations at majors (1 FY)Review IndicatorCombined0000000
Single-event violations at non-majors (1 FY)Informational OnlyCombined0000000
BFacilities with unresolved compliance schedule violations (at end of FY)Data QualityCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00.0%
CFacilities with unresolved permit schedule violations (at end of FY)Data QualityCombined25.0%41.4%51.4%51.1%32.8%37.3%33.8%
DPercentage major facilities with DMR violations (1 FY)Data QualityCombined69.4%58.3%52.8%58.3%61.1%38.9%36.1%
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
AMajor facilities in SNC (1 FY)Review IndicatorCombined1010141712810
SNC rate: percent majors in SNC (1 FY)Review IndicatorCombined18.5%18.5%25.9%31.5%22.2%14.8%18.5%
BWet weather SNC Metric(s) likely to be developed in the future.
10. Timely and appropriate action. degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
AMajor facilities without timely action (1 FY)GoalCombined11.1%14.8%11.1%9.3%11.1%9.3%14.8%
Download a comma delimited text file Download an excel file Report Generated on 6/30/2011   
Data Refresh Dates   

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.


Caveats:
0EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI

1 Metric 1B1 data is pulled manually for ICIS-NPDES states, and is available only for FY2008 through FY2010. Metric 1B1 data is programmed for PCS states, and is available for all FYs. Because of the mix of manual and programmed data, the percentage shown in national average column reflects the national average for PCS or ICIS-NPDES, and not the true national average.
2 Metric 1B2 data is pulled manually, and is available only for FY2007 through FY2010
3 Metric 1B3 data is pulled manually, and is available only for FY2007 through FY2010
4 Metric 1C1 data is pulled manually for ICIS-NPDES states, and is available only for FY2008 through FY2010. Metric 1C1 data is programmed for PCS states, and is available for all FYs.
5 Metric 1C2 data is pulled manually, and is available only for FY2007 through FY2010
6 Metric 1C3 data is pulled manually, and is available only for FY2007 through FY2010
7 Metric 1D2 data is pulled manually, and is available only for CY2007 through CY2009.

Jump to main content.