| Metric |
Metric Type |
Agency |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Graph |
| 1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete. |
| A | Active facility universe: NPDES major individual permits (Current) | Data Quality | Combined | 96 | 96 | 96 | 96 | 96 | 96 | 96 | n/a |
| Active facility universe: NPDES major general permits (Current) | Data Quality | Combined | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Active facility universe: NPDES non-major individual permits (Current) | Data Quality | Combined | 1,378 | 1,378 | 1,378 | 1,378 | 1,378 | 1,378 | 1,378 | n/a |
| Active facility universe: NPDES non-major general permits (Current) | Data Quality | Combined | 1,721 | 1,721 | 1,721 | 1,721 | 1,721 | 1,721 | 1,721 | n/a |
| B | Major individual permits: correctly coded limits 1 | Goal | Combined | 64.6% | 78.1% | 84.4% | 84.4% | 88.5% | 89.6% | 97.9% |  |
| Major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on MRs expected (Forms/Forms) (1 Qtr) 2 | Goal | Combined | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 97.9% | 100.0% | 99.8% |  |
| Major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on DMRs expected (Permits/Permits) (1 Qtr) 3 | Goal | Combined | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 79.3% | 95.4% | 90.1% | 100.0% |  |
| Major individual permits: manual RNC/SNC override rate (1 FY) | Data Quality | Combined | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |  |
| C | Non-major individual permits: correctly coded limits 4 | Informational Only | Combined | 48.4% | 67.8% | 74.4% | 82.6% | 88.2% | 90.0% | 90.7% |  |
| Non-major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on DMRs expected (Forms/Forms) (1 Qtr) 5 | Informational Only | Combined | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 91.6% | 93.4% | 98.6% | 99.9% |  |
| Non-major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on DMRs expected (Permits/Permits) (1 Qtr) 6 | Informational Only | Combined | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 20.0% | 22.9% | 22.0% | 99.7% |  |
| D | Violations at non-majors: noncompliance rate (1 FY) | Informational Only | Combined | 42.8% | 24.4% | 25.0% | 26.4% | 31.1% | 38.7% | 39.3% |  |
| Violations at non-majors: noncompliance rate in the annual noncompliance report (ANCR)(1 CY) 7 | Informational Only | Combined | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 81.1% | 36.7% | 20.4% | 0 / 0 |  |
| Violations at non-majors: DMR non-receipt (3 FY) | Informational Only | Combined | 0 | 0 | 241 | 331 | 452 | 417 | 214 |  |
| E | Informal actions: number of major facilities (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 25 | 31 | 20 | 29 | 35 | 52 | 44 |  |
| EPA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  |
| Informal actions: number of actions at major facilities (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 40 | 51 | 46 | 59 | 64 | 108 | 107 |  |
| EPA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  |
| Informal actions: number of non-major facilities (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 258 | 274 | 202 | 241 | 373 | 648 | 510 |  |
| EPA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| Informal actions: number of actions at non-major facilities (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 340 | 402 | 261 | 317 | 470 | 786 | 627 |  |
| EPA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| F | Formal actions: number of major facilities (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 9 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 11 | 9 | 12 |  |
| EPA | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| Formal actions: number of actions at major facilities (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 10 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 9 | 12 |  |
| EPA | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| Formal actions: number of non-major facilities (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 10 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 29 | 27 | 66 |  |
| EPA | 2 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |  |
| Formal actions: number of actions at non-major facilities (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 11 | 8 | 5 | 10 | 30 | 28 | 66 |  |
| EPA | 2 | 19 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |  |
| G | Penalties: total number of penalties (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 8 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 20 | 23 | 36 |  |
| EPA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| Penalties: total penalties (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | $223,712 | $63,300 | $6,250 | $108,750 | $308,294 | $733,806 | $536,804 |  |
| EPA | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |  |
| Penalties: total collected pursuant to civil judicial actions (3 FY) | Data Quality | State | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |  |
| EPA | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |  |
| Penalties: total collected pursuant to administrative actions (3 FY) | Informational Only | State | $279,649 | $309,512 | $287,012 | $172,050 | $417,044 | $1,150,850 | $1,578,904 |  |
| EPA | $600 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |  |
| No activity indicator - total number of penalties (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | $223,712 | $63,300 | $6,250 | $108,750 | $308,294 | $733,806 | $536,804 |  |
| EPA | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |  |
| 2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate. |
| A | Actions linked to violations: major facilities (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 80.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 91.7% | 100.0% | 100.0% |  |
| EPA | 0 / 0 | 0.0% | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |  |
| 5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations. |
| A | Inspection coverage: NPDES majors (1 FY) | Goal | State | 278.1% | 363.5% | 301.0% | 246.9% | 247.9% | 179.2% | 203.1% |  |
| EPA | 0.0% | 9.4% | 1.0% | 8.3% | 1.0% | 3.1% | 1.0% |  |
| Combined | 67.7% | 87.5% | 87.5% | 81.2% | 74.0% | 53.1% | 61.5% |  |
| B | Inspection coverage: NPDES non-major individual permits (1 FY) | Goal | State | 17.6% | 22.0% | 13.2% | 29.0% | 26.9% | 9.5% | 9.5% |  |
| EPA | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.1% |  |
| Combined | 17.6% | 22.1% | 13.2% | 29.0% | 27.1% | 9.7% | 9.6% |  |
| Inspection coverage: NPDES non-major general permits (1 FY) | Goal | State | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 2.0% | 5.7% |  |
| EPA | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |  |
| Combined | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 1.5% | 1.7% | 2.0% | 5.7% |  |
| C | Inspection coverage: NPDES other (not 5a or 5b) (1 FY) | Informational Only | State | 3.7% | 4.3% | 1.2% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.8% |  |
| EPA | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |  |
| Combined | 3.7% | 4.5% | 1.2% | 2.1% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.8% |  |
| 7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information. |
| A | Single-event violations at majors (1 FY) | Review Indicator | Combined | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |  |
| Single-event violations at non-majors (1 FY) | Informational Only | Combined | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 |  |
| B | Facilities with unresolved compliance schedule violations (at end of FY) | Data Quality | Combined | 14.3% | 11.5% | 16.7% | 13.9% | 13.6% | 16.3% | 5.1% |  |
| C | Facilities with unresolved permit schedule violations (at end of FY) | Data Quality | Combined | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |  |
| D | Percentage major facilities with DMR violations (1 FY) | Data Quality | Combined | 0.0% | 52.1% | 55.2% | 49.0% | 53.1% | 52.1% | 49.0% |  |
| 8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner. |
| A | Major facilities in SNC (1 FY) | Review Indicator | Combined | 15 | 19 | 20 | 15 | 15 | 12 | 11 |  |
| SNC rate: percent majors in SNC (1 FY) | Review Indicator | Combined | 15.6% | 19.8% | 20.8% | 15.6% | 15.6% | 12.5% | 11.5% |  |
| B | Wet weather SNC |
Metric(s) likely to be developed in the future. |
| 10. Timely and appropriate action. degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media. |
| A | Major facilities without timely action (1 FY) | Goal | Combined | 16.7% | 7.3% | 11.5% | 9.4% | 10.4% | 6.2% | 8.3% |  |