Jump to main content.


State Review Framework - CWA Data for North Carolina, State Multi-Year Report

Help Page
Metric Metric Type Agency 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
AActive facility universe: NPDES major individual permits (Current)Data QualityCombined215215215215215215215n/a
Active facility universe: NPDES major general permits (Current)Data QualityCombined0000000n/a
Active facility universe: NPDES non-major individual permits (Current)Data QualityCombined1,0321,0321,0321,0321,0321,0321,032n/a
Active facility universe: NPDES non-major general permits (Current)Data QualityCombined4,6984,6984,6984,6984,6984,6984,698n/a
BMajor individual permits: correctly coded limits 1GoalCombined58.6%74.4%80.0%90.2%87.4%83.3%93.0%
Major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on MRs expected (Forms/Forms) (1 Qtr) 2GoalCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 0100.0%98.7%99.1%99.9%
Major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on DMRs expected (Permits/Permits) (1 Qtr) 3GoalCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 086.0%99.1%96.3%100.0%
Major individual permits: manual RNC/SNC override rate (1 FY)Data QualityCombined22.2%22.2%22.2%22.2%22.2%22.2%22.2%
CNon-major individual permits: correctly coded limits 4Informational OnlyCombined1.7%39.2%57.7%71.6%85.5%85.6%86.6%
Non-major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on DMRs expected (Forms/Forms) (1 Qtr) 5Informational OnlyCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 088.6%89.0%94.5%21.9%
Non-major individual permits: DMR entry rate based on DMRs expected (Permits/Permits) (1 Qtr) 6Informational OnlyCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 064.9%84.5%90.9%60.0%
DViolations at non-majors: noncompliance rate (1 FY)Informational OnlyCombined11.8%8.8%13.3%10.6%16.1%23.2%34.4%
Violations at non-majors: noncompliance rate in the annual noncompliance report (ANCR)(1 CY) 7Informational OnlyCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 074.4%17.4%25.1%0 / 0
Violations at non-majors: DMR non-receipt (3 FY)Informational OnlyCombined32320159317342
EInformal actions: number of major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState1924550696369
EPA6411950
Informal actions: number of actions at major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState2726198124111101
EPA6411950
Informal actions: number of non-major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState6711401519454490465
EPA3000000
Informal actions: number of actions at non-major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState8512588779686740703
EPA3000000
FFormal actions: number of major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState68535146464446
EPA1001121
Formal actions: number of actions at major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState151129941019111790
EPA1002121
Formal actions: number of non-major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState250200228252234238239
EPA20171182142
Formal actions: number of actions at non-major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState541362374474470492485
EPA22271182142
GPenalties: total number of penalties (1 FY)Data QualityState680465458558551572550
EPA0101000
Penalties: total penalties (1 FY)Data QualityState$706,434$678,520$737,163$857,951$860,639$791,839$732,035
EPA$0$7,500$0$125,000$0$0$0
Penalties: total collected pursuant to civil judicial actions (3 FY)Data QualityState$0$0$0$0$0$0$0
EPA$0$0$0$0$0$0$0
Penalties: total collected pursuant to administrative actions (3 FY)Informational OnlyState$2,368,869$2,441,108$2,122,117$2,273,634$2,455,753$2,510,429$2,384,513
EPA$48,156$55,656$7,500$132,500$125,000$125,000$0
No activity indicator - total number of penalties (1 FY)Data QualityState$706,434$678,520$737,163$857,951$860,639$791,839$732,035
EPA$0$7,500$0$125,000$0$0$0
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
AActions linked to violations: major facilities (1 FY)Data QualityState100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%
EPA0.0%0 / 00 / 0100.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
AInspection coverage: NPDES majors (1 FY)GoalState278.1%310.2%314.4%294.9%279.5%315.8%291.6%
EPA2.8%0.9%0.9%2.8%0.9%4.2%0.9%
Combined75.3%85.1%89.3%86.5%83.3%87.4%80.9%
BInspection coverage: NPDES non-major individual permits (1 FY)GoalState25.3%25.2%75.4%79.1%52.6%60.5%59.1%
EPA0.5%0.1%0.1%0.3%0.0%0.2%0.0%
Combined25.8%25.3%75.5%79.2%52.6%60.7%59.1%
Inspection coverage: NPDES non-major general permits (1 FY)GoalState2.9%6.6%12.1%15.1%15.3%16.8%16.5%
EPA0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Combined2.9%6.6%12.2%15.1%15.3%16.8%16.5%
CInspection coverage: NPDES other (not 5a or 5b) (1 FY)Informational OnlyState0.3%66.6%75.7%66.6%6.4%7.1%4.2%
EPA0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Combined0.3%66.6%75.7%66.6%6.4%7.1%4.2%
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
ASingle-event violations at majors (1 FY)Review IndicatorCombined37616191516
Single-event violations at non-majors (1 FY)Informational OnlyCombined3353120174161178133
BFacilities with unresolved compliance schedule violations (at end of FY)Data QualityCombined9.1%12.5%13.3%7.1%15.4%25.0%35.0%
CFacilities with unresolved permit schedule violations (at end of FY)Data QualityCombined0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
DPercentage major facilities with DMR violations (1 FY)Data QualityCombined0.0%42.8%51.2%51.6%51.6%43.7%47.9%
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
AMajor facilities in SNC (1 FY)Review IndicatorCombined26473637383428
SNC rate: percent majors in SNC (1 FY)Review IndicatorCombined12.1%21.9%16.7%17.2%17.7%15.8%13.0%
BWet weather SNC Metric(s) likely to be developed in the future.
10. Timely and appropriate action. degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
AMajor facilities without timely action (1 FY)GoalCombined8.4%8.4%14.4%9.8%15.3%14.0%11.2%
Download a comma delimited text file Download an excel file Report Generated on 6/30/2011   
Data Refresh Dates   

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.


Caveats:
0EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI

1 Metric 1B1 data is pulled manually for ICIS-NPDES states, and is available only for FY2008 through FY2010. Metric 1B1 data is programmed for PCS states, and is available for all FYs. Because of the mix of manual and programmed data, the percentage shown in national average column reflects the national average for PCS or ICIS-NPDES, and not the true national average.
2 Metric 1B2 data is pulled manually, and is available only for FY2007 through FY2010
3 Metric 1B3 data is pulled manually, and is available only for FY2007 through FY2010
4 Metric 1C1 data is pulled manually for ICIS-NPDES states, and is available only for FY2008 through FY2010. Metric 1C1 data is programmed for PCS states, and is available for all FYs.
5 Metric 1C2 data is pulled manually, and is available only for FY2007 through FY2010
6 Metric 1C3 data is pulled manually, and is available only for FY2007 through FY2010
7 Metric 1D2 data is pulled manually, and is available only for CY2007 through CY2009.

Jump to main content.