| Metric |
Metric Type |
Agency |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Graph |
| 1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete. |
| A | Number of operating TSDFs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | n/a |
| Number of active LQGs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | n/a |
| Number of active SQGs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 180 | n/a |
| Number of all other active sites in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 952 | 952 | 952 | 952 | 952 | 952 | 952 | n/a |
| Number of LQGs per latest official biennial report (current) | Data Quality | State | 32 | 32 | 25 | 25 | 33 | 33 | 21 | n/a |
| B | Compliance monitoring: number of inspections (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| EPA | 71 | 69 | 66 | 31 | 22 | 12 | 23 |  |
| Compliance monitoring: sites inspected (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| EPA | 70 | 69 | 65 | 27 | 19 | 12 | 21 |  |
| C | Number of sites with violations determined at any time (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| EPA | 42 | 32 | 32 | 31 | 11 | 19 | 13 |  |
| Number of sites with violations determined during the FY | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| EPA | 24 | 15 | 26 | 22 | 3 | 11 | 1 |  |
| D | Informal actions: number of sites (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| EPA | 50 | 17 | 31 | 21 | 5 | 11 | 3 |  |
| Informal actions: number of actions (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| EPA | 58 | 17 | 32 | 22 | 5 | 12 | 3 |  |
| E | SNC: number of sites with new SNC (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| EPA | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  |
| SNC: Number of sites in SNC (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| EPA | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 |  |
| F | Formal action: number of sites (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| EPA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  |
| Formal action: number taken (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| EPA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  |
| G | Total amount of final penalties (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |  |
| EPA | $0 | $69,078 | $0 | $279,800 | $40,300 | $0 | $126,608 |  |
| 2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate. |
| A | Number of sites SNC-determined on day of formal action (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| Number of sites SNC-determined within one week of formal action (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| B | Number of sites in violation for greater than 240 days (current) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| EPA | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | n/a |
| 3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete. |
| A | Percent SNCs entered ≥ 60 days after designation (1 FY) 1 | Review Indicator | State | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |  |
| EPA | 0 / 0 | 0.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 0.0% |  |
| 5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations. |
| A | Inspection coverage for operating TSDFs (2 FYs) | Goal | State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |  |
| Combined | 100.0% | 100.0% | 66.7% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |  |
| B | Inspection coverage for LQGs (1 FY) | Goal | State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |  |
| Combined | 40.6% | 15.6% | 36.0% | 16.0% | 18.2% | 9.1% | 42.9% |  |
| C | Inspection coverage for LQGs (5 FYs) | Goal | State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |  |
| Combined | 53.1% | 59.4% | 76.0% | 80.0% | 57.6% | 42.4% | 71.4% |  |
| D | Inspection coverage for active SQGs (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |  |
| Combined | 15.6% | 21.1% | 26.7% | 28.3% | 27.2% | 19.4% | 15.6% |  |
| E | Inspections at active CESQGs (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| Combined | 91 | 100 | 119 | 119 | 111 | 84 | 54 |  |
| Inspections at active transporters (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| Combined | 28 | 25 | 27 | 31 | 30 | 25 | 20 |  |
| Inspections at non-notifiers (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| Combined | 15 | 16 | 21 | 20 | 18 | 12 | 9 |  |
| Inspections at active sites other than those listed in 5a-d and 5e1-5e3 (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| Combined | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2 |  |
| 7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information. |
| C | Violation identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |  |
| EPA | 34.3% | 21.7% | 40.0% | 81.5% | 15.8% | 91.7% | 4.8% |  |
| 8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner. |
| A | SNC identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |  |
| Combined | 2.9% | 1.4% | 1.5% | 7.4% | 5.3% | 0.0% | 4.8% |  |
| B | Percent of SNC determinations made within 150 days (1 FY) | Goal | State | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |  |
| EPA | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 100.0% |  |
| C | Percent of formal actions taken that received a prior SNC listing (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |  |
| EPA | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 100.0% |  |
| 10. Timely and appropriate action. degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media. |
| A | Percent of SNCs with formal action/referral taken within 360 days (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |  |
| Combined | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 / 0 | 0.0% |  |
| B | No activity indicator - number of formal actions (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| 12. Final penalty assessment and collection. degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected. |
| A | No activity indicator - penalties (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |  |
| B | Percent of final formal actions with penalty (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |  |
| Combined | 0.0% | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 100.0% |  |