| Metric |
Metric Type |
Agency |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Graph |
| 1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete. |
| A | Number of operating TSDFs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | n/a |
| Number of active LQGs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 185 | 185 | 185 | 185 | 185 | 185 | 185 | n/a |
| Number of active SQGs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 335 | 335 | 335 | 335 | 335 | 335 | 335 | n/a |
| Number of all other active sites in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 1,422 | 1,422 | 1,422 | 1,422 | 1,422 | 1,422 | 1,422 | n/a |
| Number of LQGs per latest official biennial report (current) | Data Quality | State | 177 | 177 | 160 | 160 | 146 | 146 | 146 | n/a |
| B | Compliance monitoring: number of inspections (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 145 | 115 | 83 | 93 | 77 | 83 | 97 |  |
| EPA | 7 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 11 | 8 | 10 | |
| Compliance monitoring: sites inspected (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 127 | 104 | 70 | 84 | 66 | 69 | 88 | |
| EPA | 5 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 11 | 8 | 8 | |
| C | Number of sites with violations determined at any time (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 90 | 68 | 51 | 66 | 65 | 83 | 113 | |
| EPA | 5 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 5 | |
| Number of sites with violations determined during the FY | Data Quality | State | 59 | 35 | 19 | 34 | 38 | 50 | 77 | |
| EPA | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| D | Informal actions: number of sites (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 65 | 40 | 21 | 37 | 40 | 52 | 76 | |
| EPA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| Informal actions: number of actions (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 83 | 54 | 35 | 52 | 65 | 81 | 108 | |
| EPA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
| E | SNC: number of sites with new SNC (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 13 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 15 | 14 | 23 | |
| EPA | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| SNC: Number of sites in SNC (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 28 | 27 | 18 | 21 | 21 | 22 | 28 | |
| EPA | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
| F | Formal action: number of sites (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 13 | 8 | 5 | 12 | 15 | 16 | 18 | |
| EPA | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
| Formal action: number taken (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 16 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 16 | 17 | 23 | |
| EPA | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
| G | Total amount of final penalties (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | $54,906 | $149,129 | $278,584 | $369,502 | $203,214 | $281,051 | $174,618 | |
| EPA | $0 | $7,729 | $241,129 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $1,350,000 | |
| 2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate. |
| A | Number of sites SNC-determined on day of formal action (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Number of sites SNC-determined within one week of formal action (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| B | Number of sites in violation for greater than 240 days (current) | Data Quality | State | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | n/a |
| EPA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | n/a |
| 3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete. |
| A | Percent SNCs entered ≥ 60 days after designation (1 FY) 1 | Review Indicator | State | 0 / 0 | 12.5% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 6.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| EPA | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations. |
| A | Inspection coverage for operating TSDFs (2 FYs) | Goal | State | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| Combined | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| B | Inspection coverage for LQGs (1 FY) | Goal | State | 16.4% | 7.9% | 10.0% | 20.6% | 26.7% | 32.9% | 30.8% | |
| Combined | 16.9% | 8.5% | 12.5% | 23.8% | 31.5% | 34.2% | 32.2% | |
| C | Inspection coverage for LQGs (5 FYs) | Goal | State | 38.4% | 37.9% | 36.2% | 46.2% | 58.2% | 74.7% | 89.0% | |
| Combined | 39.5% | 39.0% | 39.4% | 51.9% | 66.4% | 83.6% | 94.5% | |
| D | Inspection coverage for active SQGs (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 7.8% | 10.7% | 11.0% | 11.3% | 12.2% | 10.4% | 12.5% | |
| Combined | 8.4% | 11.3% | 11.6% | 12.2% | 12.8% | 11.0% | 13.4% | |
| E | Inspections at active CESQGs (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 45 | 50 | 38 | 36 | 26 | 23 | 15 | |
| Combined | 45 | 50 | 39 | 38 | 28 | 27 | 19 | |
| Inspections at active transporters (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 37 | 36 | 33 | 30 | 26 | 28 | 28 | |
| Combined | 38 | 37 | 34 | 30 | 27 | 30 | 31 | |
| Inspections at non-notifiers (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Combined | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Inspections at active sites other than those listed in 5a-d and 5e1-5e3 (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 22 | 20 | 20 | 16 | 14 | 14 | 12 | |
| Combined | 22 | 20 | 20 | 16 | 14 | 14 | 13 | |
| 7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information. |
| C | Violation identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 46.5% | 33.7% | 27.1% | 40.5% | 57.6% | 72.5% | 87.5% | |
| EPA | 20.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 37.5% | 0.0% | 12.5% | 0.0% | |
| 8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner. |
| A | SNC identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 10.2% | 9.6% | 5.7% | 9.5% | 22.7% | 20.3% | 26.1% | |
| Combined | 10.1% | 10.6% | 5.4% | 8.9% | 20.3% | 18.9% | 24.5% | |
| B | Percent of SNC determinations made within 150 days (1 FY) | Goal | State | 80.0% | 63.6% | 83.3% | 87.5% | 93.8% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| EPA | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| C | Percent of formal actions taken that received a prior SNC listing (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 93.3% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| EPA | 0.0% | 40.0% | 60.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | |
| 10. Timely and appropriate action. degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media. |
| A | Percent of SNCs with formal action/referral taken within 360 days (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 0.0% | 20.0% | 25.0% | 87.5% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 52.2% | |
| Combined | 0.0% | 18.2% | 25.0% | 87.5% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 52.2% | |
| B | No activity indicator - number of formal actions (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 15 | 9 | 6 | 16 | 16 | 17 | 22 | |
| 12. Final penalty assessment and collection. degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected. |
| A | No activity indicator - penalties (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | $54,905 | $149,129 | $278,584 | $369,502 | $203,214 | $281,051 | $174,618 | |
| B | Percent of final formal actions with penalty (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 76.9% | 100.0% | 75.0% | 91.7% | 100.0% | 93.3% | 87.5% | |
| Combined | 76.9% | 100.0% | 83.3% | 91.7% | 93.3% | 87.5% | 88.2% | |
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}