SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - RCRA Data for Guam , State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Number of operating TSDFs in RCRAInfo (current)	Data Quality	State	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	n/a
	Number of active LQGs in RCRAInfo (current)	Data Quality	State	38	38	38	38	38	38	38	n/a
	Number of active SQGs in RCRAInfo (current)	Data Quality	State	37	37	37	37	37	37	37	n/a
	Number of all other active sites in RCRAInfo (current)	Data Quality	State	58	58	58	58	58	58	58	n/a
	Number of LQGs per latest official biennial report (current)	Data Quality	State	11	11	12	12	13	13	15	n/a
B	Compliance monitoring: number of inspections (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	1	1	0	0	0	6	1
	Compliance monitoring: number of inspections (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	7	3	10	9	9	0	6
	Compliance monitoring: sites inspected (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	1	1	0	0	0	6	1
	Compliance monitoring: sites inspected (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	7	3	10	9	9	0	6
C	Number of sites with violations determined at any time (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	3	3	3	3	3	5	4
		Data Quality	EPA	4	3	6	8	4	0	2
	Number of sites with violations determined during the FY	Data Quality	State	1	0	0	0	0	2	0
	Number of sites with violations determined during the FY	Data Quality	EPA	2	0	3	4	0	0	2
D	Informal actions: number of sites (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Informal actions: number of sites (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	1	0	0	1	2	0	0
	Informal actions: number of actions (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Informal actions: number of actions (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	1	0	0	1	3	0	0
E	SNC: number of sites with new SNC (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	SNC: number of sites with new SNC (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	1	0	0	0	0	0	0
	SNC: Number of sites in SNC (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	SNC: Number of sites in SNC (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	2	2	2	1	1	0	0
F	Formal action: number of sites (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Formal action: number of sites (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	1	1	2	0	1	0	0
	Formal action: number taken (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Formal action: number taken (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	2	2	3	0	2	0	0
G	Total amount of final penalties (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
G	Total amount of final penalties (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	$0	$14,000	$57,034	$0	$10,000	$0	$0
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of sites SNC-determined on day of formal action (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
A	Number of sites SNC-determined within one week of formal action (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
B	Number of sites in violation for greater than 240 days (current)	Data Quality	State	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	n/a
B		Data Quality	EPA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent SNCs entered ≥ 60 days after designation (1 FY) ¹	Review Indicator	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
A	Percent SNCs entered ≥ 60 days after designation (1 FY) ¹	Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	100.0%	100.0%	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	Inspection coverage for operating TSDFs (2 FYs)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	33.3%	33.3%
A	Inspection coverage for operating TSDFs (2 FYs)	Goal	Combined	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
B	Inspection coverage for LQGs (1 FY)	Goal	State	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	30.8%	0.0%
B	Inspection coverage for LQGs (1 FY)	Goal	Combined	27.3%	27.3%	33.3%	33.3%	53.8%	30.8%	33.3%
C	Inspection coverage for LQGs (5 FYs)	Goal	State	27.3%	27.3%	16.7%	0.0%	0.0%	30.8%	33.3%
C	Inspection coverage for LQGs (5 FYs)	Goal	Combined	81.8%	72.7%	66.7%	75.0%	69.2%	69.2%	73.3%
D	Inspection coverage for active SQGs (5 FYs)	Informational Only	State	8.1%	8.1%	2.7%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
D	Inspection coverage for active SQGs (5 FYs)	Informational Only	Combined	21.6%	18.9%	18.9%	18.9%	16.2%	10.8%	10.8%
E	Inspections at active CESQGs (5 FYs)	Informational Only	State	3	2	2	1	0	0	0
	Inspections at active CESQGs (5 FYs)	Informational Only	Combined	5	2	3	2	1	1	1
	Inspections at active transporters (5 FYs)	Informational Only	State	7	5	3	1	1	0	0
	Inspections at active transporters (5 FYs)	Informational Only	Combined	9	7	4	5	5	4	4
	Inspections at non-notifiers (5 FYs)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Inspections at non-notifiers (5 FYs)	Informational Only	Combined	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	Inspections at active sites other than those listed in 5a-d and 5e1-5e3 (5 FYs)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
		Informational Only	Combined	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Violation identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	0.0%	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	33.3%	0.0%
C		Review Indicator	EPA	28.6%	0.0%	30.0%	44.4%	0.0%	0 / 0	33.3%
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	SNC identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.0%	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0.0%	0.0%
A	SNC identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY)	Review Indicator	Combined	12.5%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
B	Percent of SNC determinations made within 150 days (1 FY)	Goal	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
B	Percent of SNC determinations made within 150 days (1 FY)	Goal	EPA	100.0%	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
C	Percent of formal actions taken that received a prior SNC listing (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
C		Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0.0%	100.0%	0 / 0	100.0%	0 / 0	0 / 0
10. Timely and appropriate action. degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent of SNCs with formal action/referral taken within 360 days (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
A		Review Indicator	Combined	0.0%	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
B	No activity indicator - number of formal actions (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No activity indicator - penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
B	Percent of final formal actions with penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0
B	Percent of final formal actions with penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	Combined	0.0%	100.0%	100.0%	0 / 0	100.0%	0 / 0	0 / 0

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ Metric 3A data are pulled manually, and are updated annually at the end of each fiscal year. Metric 3A data is not available for FY04.