SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - RCRA Data for Idaho, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Number of operating TSDFs in RCRAInfo (current)	Data Quality	State	3	3	3	3	3	3	3	n/a
	Number of active LQGs in RCRAInfo (current)	Data Quality	State	22	22	22	22	22	22	22	n/a
	Number of active SQGs in RCRAInfo (current)	Data Quality	State	112	112	112	112	112	112	112	n/a
	Number of all other active sites in RCRAInfo (current)	Data Quality	State	941	941	941	941	941	941	941	n/a
	Number of LQGs per latest official biennial report (current)	Data Quality	State	21	21	23	23	22	22	18	n/a
B	Compliance monitoring: number of inspections (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	116	150	115	109	94	132	108
	Compliance monitoring: number of inspections (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	13	14	23	10	16	5	2
	Compliance monitoring: sites inspected (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	64	102	77	70	56	88	75
	Compliance monitoring: sites inspected (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	13	13	19	10	16	5	2
C	Number of sites with violations determined at any time (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	21	34	40	35	45	64	44
		Data Quality	EPA	2	1	2	13	5	10	3
	Number of sites with violations determined during the FY	Data Quality	State	11	26	30	22	30	50	29
	Number of sites with violations determined during the FY	Data Quality	EPA	0	1	1	11	0	7	0
D	Informal actions: number of sites (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	7	19	28	19	26	39	17
	Informal actions: number of sites (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	3	1	2	11	1	7	1
	Informal actions: number of actions (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	10	23	28	22	28	40	18
	Informal actions: number of actions (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	3	1	2	11	1	7	1
E	SNC: number of sites with new SNC (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	2	2	4	3	5	4	1
	SNC: number of sites with new SNC (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	1	0	1	1	1	0	0
	SNC: Number of sites in SNC (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	11	10	12	12	15	16	11
	SNC: Number of sites in SNC (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	2	2	2	3	4	4	2
F	Formal action: number of sites (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	6	10	10	7	15	13	8
	Formal action: number of sites (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	1	0	1	1	3	2	0
	Formal action: number taken (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	6	13	10	7	17	14	11
	Formal action: number taken (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	1	0	1	1	4	3	0
G	Total amount of final penalties (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$180,795	$71,884	$78,260	$14,800	$95,990	$338,312	$26,950
G	Total amount of final penalties (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	$0	$0	$0	$18,500	$18,500	$32,882	$0
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of sites SNC-determined on day of formal action (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	1	0	1	1	0
A	Number of sites SNC-determined within one week of formal action (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
B	Number of sites in violation for greater than 240 days (current)	Data Quality	State	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	n/a
B		Data Quality	EPA	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	n/a
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent SNCs entered ≥ 60 days after designation (1 FY) ¹	Review Indicator	State	0 / 0	0.0%	20.0%	33.3%	0.0%	0.0%	0 / 0
A	Percent SNCs entered ≥ 60 days after designation (1 FY) ¹	Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	100.0%	0 / 0
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	Inspection coverage for operating TSDFs (2 FYs)	Goal	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
A	Inspection coverage for operating TSDFs (2 FYs)	Goal	Combined	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
B	Inspection coverage for LQGs (1 FY)	Goal	State	23.8%	38.1%	39.1%	30.4%	50.0%	31.8%	50.0%
B	Inspection coverage for LQGs (1 FY)	Goal	Combined	23.8%	42.9%	52.2%	30.4%	50.0%	31.8%	50.0%
C	Inspection coverage for LQGs (5 FYs)	Goal	State	85.7%	85.7%	87.0%	87.0%	90.9%	90.9%	100.0%
C	Inspection coverage for LQGs (5 FYs)	Goal	Combined	90.5%	90.5%	95.7%	95.7%	95.5%	95.5%	105.6%
D	Inspection coverage for active SQGs (5 FYs)	Informational Only	State	28.6%	30.4%	37.5%	43.8%	45.5%	58.9%	68.8%
D	Inspection coverage for active SQGs (5 FYs)	Informational Only	Combined	28.6%	30.4%	37.5%	43.8%	45.5%	58.9%	68.8%
E	Inspections at active CESQGs (5 FYs)	Informational Only	State	129	159	157	158	146	149	124
	Inspections at active CESQGs (5 FYs)	Informational Only	Combined	141	172	172	172	159	157	128
	Inspections at active transporters (5 FYs)	Informational Only	State	94	114	130	136	134	131	121
	Inspections at active transporters (5 FYs)	Informational Only	Combined	101	123	140	147	145	140	129
	Inspections at non-notifiers (5 FYs)	Informational Only	State	0	0	0	0	0	2	2
	Inspections at non-notifiers (5 FYs)	Informational Only	Combined	0	0	0	0	0	2	2
	Inspections at active sites other than those listed in 5a-d and 5e1-5e3 (5 FYs)	Informational Only	State	10	9	9	11	11	15	23
		Informational Only	Combined	10	9	9	11	11	15	23
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Violation identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	17.2%	25.5%	39.0%	31.4%	53.6%	56.8%	38.7%
C		Review Indicator	EPA	0.0%	7.7%	5.3%	110.0%	0.0%	140.0%	0.0%
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	SNC identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	3.1%	2.0%	5.2%	4.3%	8.9%	4.5%	1.3%
A	SNC identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY)	Review Indicator	Combined	4.3%	1.9%	5.4%	5.1%	8.7%	4.5%	1.3%
B	Percent of SNC determinations made within 150 days (1 FY)	Goal	State	100.0%	100.0%	75.0%	66.7%	75.0%	75.0%	100.0%
B	Percent of SNC determinations made within 150 days (1 FY)	Goal	EPA	100.0%	0 / 0	100.0%	0.0%	0.0%	0 / 0	0 / 0
C	Percent of formal actions taken that received a prior SNC listing (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	62.5%	38.5%	60.0%	28.6%	53.3%	50.0%	40.0%
C		Review Indicator	EPA	100.0%	0 / 0	100.0%	0.0%	33.3%	100.0%	0 / 0
10. Timely and appropriate action. degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent of SNCs with formal action/referral taken within 360 days (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	50.0%	0.0%	75.0%	66.7%	80.0%	75.0%	0.0%
A		Review Indicator	Combined	33.3%	0.0%	80.0%	50.0%	66.7%	75.0%	0.0%
B	No activity indicator - number of formal actions (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	6	13	10	7	17	14	11
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No activity indicator - penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	$180,795	$71,884	$78,260	$14,800	$95,990	$338,312	$26,950
B	Percent of final formal actions with penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	40.0%	57.1%	87.5%	40.0%	53.8%	80.0%	57.1%
B	Percent of final formal actions with penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	Combined	40.0%	57.1%	87.5%	40.0%	57.1%	81.8%	57.1%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ Metric 3A data are pulled manually, and are updated annually at the end of each fiscal year. Metric 3A data is not available for FY04.