SRF State Multi-Year Report

State Review Framework - RCRA Data for Maine, State Multi-Year Report

Metric		Metric Type	Agency	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Number of operating TSDFs in RCRAInfo (current)	Data Quality	State	2	2	2	2	2	2	2	n/a
	Number of active LQGs in RCRAInfo (current)	Data Quality	State	90	90	90	90	90	90	90	n/a
	Number of active SQGs in RCRAInfo (current)	Data Quality	State	643	643	643	643	643	643	643	n/a
	Number of all other active sites in RCRAInfo (current)	Data Quality	State	561	561	561	561	561	561	561	n/a
	Number of LQGs per latest official biennial report (current)	Data Quality	State	75	75	66	66	64	64	64	n/a
B	Compliance monitoring: number of inspections (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	40	49	47	37	51	50	39
	Compliance monitoring: number of inspections (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	1	4	3	6	3	2	2
	Compliance monitoring: sites inspected (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	40	48	47	37	51	50	39
	Compliance monitoring: sites inspected (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	1	4	3	6	3	2	2
C	Number of sites with violations determined at any time (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	57	57	60	50	61	65	51
		Data Quality	EPA	6	7	6	7	7	8	8
	Number of sites with violations determined during the FY	Data Quality	State	37	47	48	35	45	44	32
	Number of sites with violations determined during the FY	Data Quality	EPA	1	1	1	2	1	1	1
D	Informal actions: number of sites (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	29	41	35	25	42	41	31
	Informal actions: number of sites (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	0	1	2	0	1	0	0
	Informal actions: number of actions (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	29	41	35	25	42	41	31
	Informal actions: number of actions (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	0	1	2	0	1	0	0
E	SNC: number of sites with new SNC (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	2	8	6	3	4	8	3
	SNC: number of sites with new SNC (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	2	0	0	1	1	1	0
	SNC: Number of sites in SNC (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	6	9	13	13	7	14	11
	SNC: Number of sites in SNC (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	5	5	0	1	1	2	1
F	Formal action: number of sites (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	5	4	7	6	1	6	7
	Formal action: number of sites (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	2	6	0	0	1	1	3
	Formal action: number taken (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	5	4	7	6	1	6	7
	Formal action: number taken (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	2	6	0	0	2	1	3
G	Total amount of final penalties (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	$43,300	$46,450	$100,300	$50,550	$4,500	$141,949	$64,495
G	Total amount of final penalties (1 FY)	Data Quality	EPA	$623,940	$877,140	$0	$0	$140,000	$0	$1,000
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
A	Number of sites SNC-determined on day of formal action (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	1	0	0	1	0
A	Number of sites SNC-determined within one week of formal action (1 FY)	Data Quality	State	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
B	Number of sites in violation for greater than 240 days (current)	Data Quality	State	7	7	7	7	7	7	7	n/a
B		Data Quality	EPA	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	n/a
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
A	Percent SNCs entered ≥ 60 days after designation (1 FY) ¹	Review Indicator	State	0 / 0	0.0%	100.0%	100.0%	33.3%	0.0%	33.3%
A	Percent SNCs entered ≥ 60 days after designation (1 FY) ¹	Review Indicator	EPA	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	0 / 0	100.0%	0 / 0
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
A	Inspection coverage for operating TSDFs (2 FYs)	Goal	State	100.0%	50.0%	50.0%	100.0%	100.0%	50.0%	100.0%
A	Inspection coverage for operating TSDFs (2 FYs)	Goal	Combined	100.0%	50.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
B	Inspection coverage for LQGs (1 FY)	Goal	State	8.0%	5.3%	19.7%	18.2%	17.2%	10.9%	17.2%
B	Inspection coverage for LQGs (1 FY)	Goal	Combined	8.0%	5.3%	21.2%	21.2%	20.3%	12.5%	18.8%
C	Inspection coverage for LQGs (5 FYs)	Goal	State	41.3%	40.0%	45.5%	57.6%	65.6%	68.8%	75.0%
C	Inspection coverage for LQGs (5 FYs)	Goal	Combined	50.7%	45.3%	50.0%	60.6%	70.3%	75.0%	82.8%
D	Inspection coverage for active SQGs (5 FYs)	Informational Only	State	9.8%	10.9%	11.8%	12.6%	13.7%	14.2%	12.9%
D	Inspection coverage for active SQGs (5 FYs)	Informational Only	Combined	11.2%	12.3%	12.8%	13.4%	14.5%	14.8%	13.1%
E	Inspections at active CESQGs (5 FYs)	Informational Only	State	42	46	45	46	45	46	42
	Inspections at active CESQGs (5 FYs)	Informational Only	Combined	48	51	49	50	48	49	44
	Inspections at active transporters (5 FYs)	Informational Only	State	8	8	7	9	10	11	10
	Inspections at active transporters (5 FYs)	Informational Only	Combined	9	8	8	10	12	13	12
	Inspections at non-notifiers (5 FYs)	Informational Only	State	1	1	1	0	0	0	0
	Inspections at non-notifiers (5 FYs)	Informational Only	Combined	4	4	2	1	0	0	0
	Inspections at active sites other than those listed in 5a-d and 5e1-5e3 (5 FYs)	Informational Only	State	6	6	3	3	4	6	6
		Informational Only	Combined	6	6	3	3	4	6	6
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
C	Violation identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	92.5%	97.9%	102.1%	94.6%	88.2%	88.0%	82.1%
C		Review Indicator	EPA	100.0%	25.0%	33.3%	33.3%	33.3%	50.0%	50.0%
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
A	SNC identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	5.0%	16.7%	12.8%	8.1%	7.8%	16.0%	7.7%
A	SNC identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY)	Review Indicator	Combined	9.8%	15.4%	12.0%	7.1%	9.4%	17.3%	7.5%
B	Percent of SNC determinations made within 150 days (1 FY)	Goal	State	100.0%	87.5%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	75.0%	100.0%
B	Percent of SNC determinations made within 150 days (1 FY)	Goal	EPA	100.0%	0 / 0	0 / 0	0.0%	0.0%	100.0%	0 / 0
C	Percent of formal actions taken that received a prior SNC listing (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	80.0%	75.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	85.7%
C		Review Indicator	EPA	100.0%	83.3%	0 / 0	0 / 0	100.0%	0.0%	33.3%
10. Timely and appropriate action. degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
A	Percent of SNCs with formal action/referral taken within 360 days (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	0.0%	0.0%	33.3%	0.0%	25.0%	12.5%	33.3%
A		Review Indicator	Combined	0.0%	0.0%	33.3%	0.0%	20.0%	11.1%	33.3%
B	No activity indicator - number of formal actions (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	5	4	7	6	1	6	7
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
A	No activity indicator - penalties (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	$43,300	$46,450	$100,300	$50,550	$4,500	$141,949	$64,495
B	Percent of final formal actions with penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	State	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	66.7%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
B	Percent of final formal actions with penalty (1 FY)	Review Indicator	Combined	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%	66.7%	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%

Report Generated on 6/30/2011
Data Refresh Dates

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
^* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
^* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.

Caveats:
⁰EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI
¹ Metric 3A data are pulled manually, and are updated annually at the end of each fiscal year. Metric 3A data is not available for FY04.