| Metric |
Metric Type |
Agency |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Graph |
| 1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete. |
| A | Number of operating TSDFs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | n/a |
| Number of active LQGs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 36 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 36 | n/a |
| Number of active SQGs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 82 | 82 | 82 | 82 | 82 | 82 | 82 | n/a |
| Number of all other active sites in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 1,409 | 1,409 | 1,409 | 1,409 | 1,409 | 1,409 | 1,409 | n/a |
| Number of LQGs per latest official biennial report (current) | Data Quality | State | 40 | 40 | 43 | 43 | 41 | 41 | 32 | n/a |
| B | Compliance monitoring: number of inspections (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 185 | 190 | 160 | 155 | 120 | 95 | 95 |  |
| EPA | 4 | 1 | 13 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 11 | |
| Compliance monitoring: sites inspected (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 153 | 153 | 139 | 122 | 95 | 89 | 87 | |
| EPA | 4 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 11 | |
| C | Number of sites with violations determined at any time (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 27 | 50 | 29 | 35 | 25 | 16 | 16 | |
| EPA | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| Number of sites with violations determined during the FY | Data Quality | State | 19 | 43 | 22 | 23 | 14 | 12 | 9 | |
| EPA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| D | Informal actions: number of sites (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 23 | 37 | 23 | 35 | 16 | 16 | 15 | |
| EPA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Informal actions: number of actions (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 74 | 102 | 49 | 129 | 58 | 46 | 46 | |
| EPA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| E | SNC: number of sites with new SNC (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
| EPA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| SNC: Number of sites in SNC (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 3 | 6 | |
| EPA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| F | Formal action: number of sites (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 7 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 4 | 3 | |
| EPA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Formal action: number taken (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 9 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 21 | 4 | 11 | |
| EPA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| G | Total amount of final penalties (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | $67,500 | $179,924 | $0 | $7,850 | $161,469 | $9,000 | $24,000 | |
| EPA | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
| 2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate. |
| A | Number of sites SNC-determined on day of formal action (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Number of sites SNC-determined within one week of formal action (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| B | Number of sites in violation for greater than 240 days (current) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| EPA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| 3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete. |
| A | Percent SNCs entered ≥ 60 days after designation (1 FY) 1 | Review Indicator | State | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 85.7% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | |
| EPA | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations. |
| A | Inspection coverage for operating TSDFs (2 FYs) | Goal | State | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| Combined | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 75.0% | |
| B | Inspection coverage for LQGs (1 FY) | Goal | State | 57.5% | 47.5% | 44.2% | 39.5% | 34.1% | 41.5% | 43.8% | |
| Combined | 57.5% | 47.5% | 44.2% | 39.5% | 34.1% | 41.5% | 43.8% | |
| C | Inspection coverage for LQGs (5 FYs) | Goal | State | 85.0% | 87.5% | 74.4% | 74.4% | 80.5% | 80.5% | 90.6% | |
| Combined | 85.0% | 87.5% | 74.4% | 74.4% | 80.5% | 80.5% | 90.6% | |
| D | Inspection coverage for active SQGs (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 48.8% | 52.4% | 53.7% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 47.6% | 48.8% | |
| Combined | 50.0% | 53.7% | 54.9% | 51.2% | 51.2% | 48.8% | 50.0% | |
| E | Inspections at active CESQGs (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 465 | 466 | 446 | 431 | 337 | 293 | 239 | |
| Combined | 470 | 470 | 454 | 441 | 345 | 300 | 249 | |
| Inspections at active transporters (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 18 | 16 | 13 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 17 | |
| Combined | 18 | 16 | 13 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | |
| Inspections at non-notifiers (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 12 | |
| Combined | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 12 | 13 | |
| Inspections at active sites other than those listed in 5a-d and 5e1-5e3 (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 39 | 42 | 44 | 46 | 40 | 35 | 35 | |
| Combined | 39 | 42 | 44 | 46 | 40 | 35 | 36 | |
| 7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information. |
| C | Violation identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 12.4% | 28.1% | 15.8% | 18.9% | 14.7% | 13.5% | 10.3% | |
| EPA | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 37.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | |
| 8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner. |
| A | SNC identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 6.6% | 1.1% | 2.2% | 3.4% | |
| Combined | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.7% | 6.3% | 1.0% | 2.2% | 3.3% | |
| B | Percent of SNC determinations made within 150 days (1 FY) | Goal | State | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| EPA | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| C | Percent of formal actions taken that received a prior SNC listing (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 14.3% | 33.3% | 40.0% | 100.0% | 80.0% | 75.0% | 66.7% | |
| EPA | 0.0% | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 10. Timely and appropriate action. degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media. |
| A | Percent of SNCs with formal action/referral taken within 360 days (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| Combined | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 66.7% | |
| B | No activity indicator - number of formal actions (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 8 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 15 | 4 | 9 | |
| 12. Final penalty assessment and collection. degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected. |
| A | No activity indicator - penalties (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | $67,500 | $179,924 | $0 | $7,850 | $161,469 | $9,000 | $24,000 | |
| B | Percent of final formal actions with penalty (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 60.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
| Combined | 50.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | |
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}