| Metric |
Metric Type |
Agency |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Graph |
| 1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete. |
| A | Number of operating TSDFs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | n/a |
| Number of active LQGs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 111 | 111 | 111 | 111 | 111 | 111 | 111 | n/a |
| Number of active SQGs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 205 | 205 | 205 | 205 | 205 | 205 | 205 | n/a |
| Number of all other active sites in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 2,144 | 2,144 | 2,144 | 2,144 | 2,144 | 2,144 | 2,144 | n/a |
| Number of LQGs per latest official biennial report (current) | Data Quality | State | 142 | 142 | 114 | 114 | 107 | 107 | 99 | n/a |
| B | Compliance monitoring: number of inspections (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 98 | 61 | 47 | 46 | 38 | 37 | 25 |  |
| EPA | 9 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |  |
| Compliance monitoring: sites inspected (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 81 | 56 | 41 | 40 | 36 | 36 | 25 |  |
| EPA | 9 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |  |
| C | Number of sites with violations determined at any time (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 118 | 76 | 60 | 64 | 56 | 48 | 38 |  |
| EPA | 15 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 |  |
| Number of sites with violations determined during the FY | Data Quality | State | 74 | 40 | 31 | 34 | 33 | 28 | 18 |  |
| EPA | 8 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |  |
| D | Informal actions: number of sites (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 35 | 25 | 14 | 21 | 17 | 11 | 6 |  |
| EPA | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  |
| Informal actions: number of actions (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 38 | 25 | 14 | 22 | 17 | 11 | 6 |  |
| EPA | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  |
| E | SNC: number of sites with new SNC (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |  |
| EPA | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  |
| SNC: Number of sites in SNC (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 |  |
| EPA | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |  |
| F | Formal action: number of sites (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 14 | 9 | 14 | 22 | 17 | 24 | 8 |  |
| EPA | 4 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |  |
| Formal action: number taken (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 18 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 20 | 32 | 8 |  |
| EPA | 4 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |  |
| G | Total amount of final penalties (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | $566,832 | $358,540 | $45,475 | $118,885 | $326,077 | $113,413 | $81,391 |  |
| EPA | $236,064 | $236,064 | $257,919 | $0 | $0 | $89,500 | $0 |  |
| 2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate. |
| A | Number of sites SNC-determined on day of formal action (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| Number of sites SNC-determined within one week of formal action (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| B | Number of sites in violation for greater than 240 days (current) | Data Quality | State | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | n/a |
| EPA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | n/a |
| 3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete. |
| A | Percent SNCs entered ≥ 60 days after designation (1 FY) 1 | Review Indicator | State | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |  |
| EPA | 0 / 0 | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 0 / 0 |  |
| 5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations. |
| A | Inspection coverage for operating TSDFs (2 FYs) | Goal | State | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |  |
| Combined | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |  |
| B | Inspection coverage for LQGs (1 FY) | Goal | State | 14.1% | 12.7% | 16.7% | 15.8% | 18.7% | 20.6% | 19.2% |  |
| Combined | 16.2% | 12.7% | 18.4% | 15.8% | 21.5% | 25.2% | 19.2% |  |
| C | Inspection coverage for LQGs (5 FYs) | Goal | State | 40.1% | 50.7% | 57.9% | 65.8% | 69.2% | 81.3% | 86.9% |  |
| Combined | 51.4% | 57.7% | 61.4% | 69.3% | 70.1% | 85.0% | 92.9% |  |
| D | Inspection coverage for active SQGs (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 11.2% | 11.7% | 13.7% | 13.7% | 11.7% | 8.3% | 5.4% |  |
| Combined | 13.2% | 13.2% | 16.1% | 15.6% | 14.1% | 10.2% | 8.8% |  |
| E | Inspections at active CESQGs (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 58 | 65 | 61 | 54 | 43 | 30 | 18 |  |
| Combined | 73 | 77 | 73 | 70 | 54 | 38 | 29 |  |
| Inspections at active transporters (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 10 | 13 | 11 | 12 | 10 | 6 | 3 |  |
| Combined | 10 | 13 | 11 | 12 | 10 | 6 | 3 |  |
| Inspections at non-notifiers (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| Combined | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| Inspections at active sites other than those listed in 5a-d and 5e1-5e3 (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 2 |  |
| Combined | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 2 |  |
| 7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information. |
| C | Violation identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 91.4% | 71.4% | 75.6% | 85.0% | 91.7% | 77.8% | 72.0% |  |
| EPA | 88.9% | 100.0% | 14.3% | 28.6% | 14.3% | 33.3% | 50.0% |  |
| 8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner. |
| A | SNC identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 1.2% | 1.8% | 4.9% | 2.5% | 2.8% | 5.6% | 0.0% |  |
| Combined | 5.6% | 5.4% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 2.3% | 4.8% | 3.2% |  |
| B | Percent of SNC determinations made within 150 days (1 FY) | Goal | State | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0 / 0 |  |
| EPA | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 100.0% |  |
| C | Percent of formal actions taken that received a prior SNC listing (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 23.5% | 30.0% | 5.0% | 3.3% | 10.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |  |
| EPA | 100.0% | 87.5% | 0.0% | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |  |
| 10. Timely and appropriate action. degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media. |
| A | Percent of SNCs with formal action/referral taken within 360 days (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0 / 0 |  |
| Combined | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |  |
| B | No activity indicator - number of formal actions (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 17 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 20 | 32 | 8 |  |
| 12. Final penalty assessment and collection. degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected. |
| A | No activity indicator - penalties (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | $566,832 | $358,540 | $45,475 | $118,885 | $326,077 | $113,413 | $81,391 |  |
| B | Percent of final formal actions with penalty (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 100.0% | 88.9% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |  |
| Combined | 100.0% | 92.3% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |  |