| Metric |
Metric Type |
Agency |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Graph |
| 1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete. |
| A | Number of operating TSDFs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | n/a |
| Number of active LQGs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 84 | 84 | 84 | 84 | 84 | 84 | 84 | n/a |
| Number of active SQGs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 345 | 345 | 345 | 345 | 345 | 345 | 345 | n/a |
| Number of all other active sites in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 1,317 | 1,317 | 1,317 | 1,317 | 1,317 | 1,317 | 1,317 | n/a |
| Number of LQGs per latest official biennial report (current) | Data Quality | State | 72 | 72 | 72 | 72 | 75 | 75 | 95 | n/a |
| B | Compliance monitoring: number of inspections (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 899 | 823 | 705 | 774 | 794 | 955 | 741 |  |
| EPA | 6 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 4 | 6 | 3 |  |
| Compliance monitoring: sites inspected (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 819 | 769 | 675 | 741 | 711 | 899 | 638 |  |
| EPA | 6 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 4 | 6 | 3 |  |
| C | Number of sites with violations determined at any time (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 147 | 240 | 152 | 139 | 265 | 209 | 200 |  |
| EPA | 5 | 6 | 9 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 11 |  |
| Number of sites with violations determined during the FY | Data Quality | State | 130 | 188 | 95 | 84 | 231 | 119 | 142 |  |
| EPA | 4 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 2 |  |
| D | Informal actions: number of sites (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 36 | 48 | 21 | 20 | 28 | 30 | 67 |  |
| EPA | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 1 |  |
| Informal actions: number of actions (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 40 | 54 | 21 | 21 | 30 | 31 | 70 |  |
| EPA | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 1 |  |
| E | SNC: number of sites with new SNC (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  |
| EPA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |  |
| SNC: Number of sites in SNC (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 3 | 4 |  |
| EPA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 |  |
| F | Formal action: number of sites (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 21 | 13 | 13 | 17 | 12 | 9 | 7 |  |
| EPA | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  |
| Formal action: number taken (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 38 | 21 | 32 | 39 | 18 | 18 | 14 |  |
| EPA | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  |
| G | Total amount of final penalties (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | $19,100 | $6,300 | $78,225 | $32,350 | $26,540 | $57,250 | $42,868 |  |
| EPA | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $362,020 |  |
| 2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate. |
| A | Number of sites SNC-determined on day of formal action (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 |  |
| Number of sites SNC-determined within one week of formal action (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |
| B | Number of sites in violation for greater than 240 days (current) | Data Quality | State | 84 | 84 | 84 | 84 | 84 | 84 | 84 | n/a |
| EPA | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | n/a |
| 3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete. |
| A | Percent SNCs entered ≥ 60 days after designation (1 FY) 1 | Review Indicator | State | 0 / 0 | 0.0% | 0 / 0 | 66.7% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% |  |
| EPA | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 33.3% | 0 / 0 |  |
| 5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations. |
| A | Inspection coverage for operating TSDFs (2 FYs) | Goal | State | 83.3% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 83.3% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |  |
| Combined | 83.3% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |  |
| B | Inspection coverage for LQGs (1 FY) | Goal | State | 55.6% | 54.2% | 83.3% | 70.8% | 80.0% | 84.0% | 74.7% |  |
| Combined | 56.9% | 55.6% | 84.7% | 72.2% | 80.0% | 84.0% | 74.7% |  |
| C | Inspection coverage for LQGs (5 FYs) | Goal | State | 90.3% | 94.4% | 97.2% | 98.6% | 97.3% | 98.7% | 91.6% |  |
| Combined | 93.1% | 95.8% | 97.2% | 98.6% | 97.3% | 98.7% | 91.6% |  |
| D | Inspection coverage for active SQGs (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 43.2% | 55.4% | 60.0% | 65.5% | 68.4% | 73.9% | 83.5% |  |
| Combined | 44.6% | 56.2% | 60.0% | 65.5% | 68.7% | 74.2% | 83.8% |  |
| E | Inspections at active CESQGs (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 681 | 914 | 1,036 | 1,257 | 1,470 | 1,678 | 1,710 |  |
| Combined | 700 | 929 | 1,048 | 1,263 | 1,474 | 1,684 | 1,716 |  |
| Inspections at active transporters (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 77 | 77 | 80 | 80 | 88 | 92 | 97 |  |
| Combined | 78 | 77 | 80 | 80 | 88 | 93 | 98 |  |
| Inspections at non-notifiers (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 |  |
| Combined | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 |  |
| Inspections at active sites other than those listed in 5a-d and 5e1-5e3 (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 20 | 15 | 12 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 12 |  |
| Combined | 21 | 15 | 12 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 12 |  |
| 7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information. |
| C | Violation identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 15.9% | 24.4% | 14.1% | 11.3% | 32.5% | 13.2% | 22.3% |  |
| EPA | 66.7% | 71.4% | 66.7% | 81.8% | 100.0% | 66.7% | 66.7% |  |
| 8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner. |
| A | SNC identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.9% | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.3% |  |
| Combined | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.9% | 0.6% | 0.3% | 0.3% |  |
| B | Percent of SNC determinations made within 150 days (1 FY) | Goal | State | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 100.0% | 57.1% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% |  |
| EPA | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0.0% | 50.0% | 0 / 0 |  |
| C | Percent of formal actions taken that received a prior SNC listing (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 0.0% | 15.0% | 18.8% | 38.5% | 80.0% | 33.3% | 63.6% |  |
| EPA | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0.0% | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 |  |
| 10. Timely and appropriate action. degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media. |
| A | Percent of SNCs with formal action/referral taken within 360 days (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 0 / 0 | 66.7% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |  |
| Combined | 0 / 0 | 66.7% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | 33.3% | 100.0% |  |
| B | No activity indicator - number of formal actions (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 38 | 21 | 32 | 39 | 18 | 18 | 14 |  |
| 12. Final penalty assessment and collection. degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected. |
| A | No activity indicator - penalties (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | $19,100 | $6,300 | $78,225 | $32,350 | $26,540 | $57,250 | $42,868 |  |
| B | Percent of final formal actions with penalty (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 36.8% | 37.5% | 100.0% | 77.8% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 57.1% |  |
| Combined | 33.3% | 37.5% | 85.7% | 77.8% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 62.5% |  |