Jump to main content.


State Review Framework - RCRA Data for New York, State Multi-Year Report

Help Page
Metric Metric Type Agency 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
ANumber of operating TSDFs in RCRAInfo (current)Data QualityState30303030303030n/a
Number of active LQGs in RCRAInfo (current)Data QualityState4,5614,5614,5614,5614,5614,5614,561n/a
Number of active SQGs in RCRAInfo (current)Data QualityState5,1255,1255,1255,1255,1255,1255,125n/a
Number of all other active sites in RCRAInfo (current)Data QualityState11,71411,71411,71411,71411,71411,71411,714n/a
Number of LQGs per latest official biennial report (current)Data QualityState1,4721,4721,2721,2721,0131,0132,163n/a
BCompliance monitoring: number of inspections (1 FY)Data QualityState7136587237951,013968981
EPA151132131143160129154
Compliance monitoring: sites inspected (1 FY)Data QualityState682640700776991936960
EPA145128130142159125152
CNumber of sites with violations determined at any time (1 FY)Data QualityState422396422484579560533
EPA60657170403935
Number of sites with violations determined during the FYData QualityState328313338390456439407
EPA38425043242013
DInformal actions: number of sites (1 FY)Data QualityState294292289352434411394
EPA333138261222
Informal actions: number of actions (1 FY)Data QualityState302302299357438415395
EPA373138261332
ESNC: number of sites with new SNC (1 FY)Data QualityState25302134282814
EPA55713353
SNC: Number of sites in SNC (1 FY)Data QualityState76695664645850
EPA15131318141211
FFormal action: number of sites (1 FY)Data QualityState41483144454338
EPA1281511889
Formal action: number taken (1 FY)Data QualityState60663963535451
EPA1482214121312
GTotal amount of final penalties (1 FY)Data QualityState$611,299$261,995$186,046$1,263,724$711,250$485,300$460,000
EPA$726,218$340,612$217,139$0$176,900$50,000$170,575
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
ANumber of sites SNC-determined on day of formal action (1 FY)Data QualityState0101102
Number of sites SNC-determined within one week of formal action (1 FY)Data QualityState81311120
BNumber of sites in violation for greater than 240 days (current) Data QualityState68686868686868n/a
EPA13131313131313n/a
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
APercent SNCs entered ≥ 60 days after designation (1 FY) 1Review IndicatorState0 / 00.0%20.0%13.8%19.0%12.5%27.3%
EPA0 / 00 / 045.5%33.3%40.0%100.0%100.0%
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
AInspection coverage for operating TSDFs (2 FYs)GoalState96.7%90.0%96.7%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%
Combined96.7%90.0%96.7%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%
BInspection coverage for LQGs (1 FY)GoalState13.0%11.5%13.4%11.6%18.1%17.4%10.1%
Combined14.9%13.2%15.3%13.4%19.5%20.3%11.1%
CInspection coverage for LQGs (5 FYs)GoalState32.8%33.8%36.4%37.2%45.0%48.2%26.3%
Combined35.8%37.5%40.3%41.6%50.0%54.2%29.4%
DInspection coverage for active SQGs (5 FYs)Informational OnlyState12.9%14.1%15.2%18.0%21.3%24.2%26.4%
Combined15.0%16.6%18.1%21.2%24.5%27.4%29.9%
EInspections at active CESQGs (5 FYs)Informational OnlyState8308248168289179611,065
Combined9949829669781,0741,1091,224
Inspections at active transporters (5 FYs)Informational OnlyState137134133121119122124
Combined178174178139134136137
Inspections at non-notifiers (5 FYs)Informational OnlyState1615131091010
Combined18171411101213
Inspections at active sites other than those listed in 5a-d and 5e1-5e3 (5 FYs)Informational OnlyState38373127303136
Combined38373127303240
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
CViolation identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY)Review IndicatorState48.1%48.9%48.3%50.3%46.0%46.9%42.4%
EPA26.2%32.8%38.5%30.3%15.1%16.0%8.6%
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
ASNC identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY)Review IndicatorState3.7%4.7%3.0%4.4%2.8%3.0%1.5%
Combined3.7%4.6%3.4%5.1%2.7%3.0%1.5%
BPercent of SNC determinations made within 150 days (1 FY)GoalState96.0%96.7%81.0%61.8%50.0%69.0%84.6%
EPA100.0%100.0%71.4%23.1%66.7%20.0%33.3%
CPercent of formal actions taken that received a prior SNC listing (1 FY)Review IndicatorState100.0%100.0%97.4%98.4%100.0%98.1%98.0%
EPA100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%91.7%84.6%91.7%
10. Timely and appropriate action. degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
APercent of SNCs with formal action/referral taken within 360 days (1 FY) Review IndicatorState8.0%20.0%38.1%67.6%50.0%75.0%85.7%
Combined6.7%17.1%39.3%55.3%51.6%75.0%76.5%
BNo activity indicator - number of formal actions (1 FY)Review IndicatorState60663963535451
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
ANo activity indicator - penalties (1 FY)Review IndicatorState$611,299$261,995$186,046$1,263,724$711,250$485,300$460,000
BPercent of final formal actions with penalty (1 FY)Review IndicatorState95.8%81.2%95.5%95.7%100.0%94.7%88.9%
Combined90.3%84.6%82.4%75.9%96.9%76.0%81.2%
Download a comma delimited text file Download an excel file Report Generated on 6/30/2011   
Data Refresh Dates   

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.


Caveats:
0EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI

1 Metric 3A data are pulled manually, and are updated annually at the end of each fiscal year. Metric 3A data is not available for FY04.

Jump to main content.