Jump to main content.


State Review Framework - RCRA Data for Ohio, State Multi-Year Report

Help Page
Metric Metric Type Agency 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Graph
1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
ANumber of operating TSDFs in RCRAInfo (current)Data QualityState34343434343434n/a
Number of active LQGs in RCRAInfo (current)Data QualityState1,5461,5461,5461,5461,5461,5461,546n/a
Number of active SQGs in RCRAInfo (current)Data QualityState8,9318,9318,9318,9318,9318,9318,931n/a
Number of all other active sites in RCRAInfo (current)Data QualityState10,33310,33310,33310,33310,33310,33310,333n/a
Number of LQGs per latest official biennial report (current)Data QualityState1,0981,0801,0731,018944901860n/a
BCompliance monitoring: number of inspections (1 FY)Data QualityState8047928298297689151,018
EPA47385537393641
Compliance monitoring: sites inspected (1 FY)Data QualityState756703747756694831966
EPA46375336393641
CNumber of sites with violations determined at any time (1 FY)Data QualityState9781,0261,109973963894848
EPA9297105104111113112
Number of sites with violations determined during the FYData QualityState687649719544522487496
EPA13142815282319
DInformal actions: number of sites (1 FY)Data QualityState729681773618590544532
EPA10221219302129
Informal actions: number of actions (1 FY)Data QualityState9839481,073844777661645
EPA10231319312130
ESNC: number of sites with new SNC (1 FY)Data QualityState25323934431717
EPA2332521
SNC: Number of sites in SNC (1 FY)Data QualityState83819895967770
EPA468610109
FFormal action: number of sites (1 FY)Data QualityState38314347524028
EPA4423424
Formal action: number taken (1 FY)Data QualityState38324348524028
EPA4535638
GTotal amount of final penalties (1 FY)Data QualityState$1,054,662$520,282$692,610$850,351$942,280$453,473$623,110
EPA$4,070$1,370,115$60,380$1,082,750$810,000$27,900$229,095
2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate.
ANumber of sites SNC-determined on day of formal action (1 FY)Data QualityState0000000
Number of sites SNC-determined within one week of formal action (1 FY)Data QualityState0000000
BNumber of sites in violation for greater than 240 days (current) Data QualityState201201201201201201201n/a
EPA56565656565656n/a
3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete.
APercent SNCs entered ≥ 60 days after designation (1 FY) 1Review IndicatorState0 / 053.1%65.5%25.7%30.0%50.0%80.0%
EPA0 / 066.7%66.7%50.0%0.0%25.0%0 / 0
5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations.
AInspection coverage for operating TSDFs (2 FYs)GoalState94.1%94.1%100.0%100.0%100.0%94.1%97.1%
Combined97.1%97.1%100.0%100.0%100.0%94.1%97.1%
BInspection coverage for LQGs (1 FY)GoalState22.0%18.7%24.7%24.9%23.7%19.8%12.8%
Combined22.9%19.8%25.7%25.8%24.8%21.0%14.0%
CInspection coverage for LQGs (5 FYs)GoalState68.1%67.9%68.9%74.3%78.0%79.8%80.7%
Combined68.9%68.8%70.2%76.1%80.2%81.6%83.3%
DInspection coverage for active SQGs (5 FYs)Informational OnlyState6.5%6.6%6.4%5.8%5.8%5.2%5.6%
Combined6.6%6.8%6.6%6.0%6.0%5.4%5.7%
EInspections at active CESQGs (5 FYs)Informational OnlyState8499389799739339851,032
Combined8689641,0039939541,0031,046
Inspections at active transporters (5 FYs)Informational OnlyState121121120125124124125
Combined126125124130130134138
Inspections at non-notifiers (5 FYs)Informational OnlyState191517151277
Combined191517151277
Inspections at active sites other than those listed in 5a-d and 5e1-5e3 (5 FYs)Informational OnlyState373457540586635675726
Combined386465544589639678729
7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information.
CViolation identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY)Review IndicatorState90.9%92.3%96.3%72.0%75.2%58.6%51.3%
EPA28.3%37.8%52.8%41.7%71.8%63.9%46.3%
8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner.
ASNC identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY)Review IndicatorState3.3%4.6%5.2%4.5%6.2%2.0%1.8%
Combined3.5%4.8%5.5%4.4%6.8%2.3%1.8%
BPercent of SNC determinations made within 150 days (1 FY)GoalState100.0%100.0%51.3%42.4%39.5%52.9%52.9%
EPA100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%60.0%50.0%0.0%
CPercent of formal actions taken that received a prior SNC listing (1 FY)Review IndicatorState92.1%83.9%86.0%93.8%84.6%87.5%82.1%
EPA50.0%100.0%66.7%75.0%100.0%100.0%75.0%
10. Timely and appropriate action. degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media.
APercent of SNCs with formal action/referral taken within 360 days (1 FY) Review IndicatorState0.0%0.0%12.8%17.6%37.2%29.4%35.3%
Combined0.0%0.0%11.9%17.6%33.3%26.3%33.3%
BNo activity indicator - number of formal actions (1 FY)Review IndicatorState38324348524028
12. Final penalty assessment and collection. degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected.
ANo activity indicator - penalties (1 FY)Review IndicatorState$1,054,662$520,282$692,610$850,351$942,280$453,473$623,110
BPercent of final formal actions with penalty (1 FY)Review IndicatorState90.6%81.0%92.3%97.6%88.4%60.7%65.4%
Combined90.9%82.6%90.2%97.7%88.9%60.0%70.0%
Download a comma delimited text file Download an excel file Report Generated on 6/30/2011   
Data Refresh Dates   

Note: SRF data metrics results may change as data are updated in AFS, ICIS-NPDES, PCS, and RCRAInfo. The above data set may be saved in Excel or comma delimited text format by clicking on the appropriate Save Results link above.

General Notes:
* Blue-shaded rows denote that the metric was pulled manually.
* Metrics that are listed as "current" pull live data from the most recent IDEA refresh. Results for these metrics do not change across fiscal years.


Caveats:
0EPA administers the CWA program in the following states/territories: AK, DC, ID, MA, NH, NM, AS, GU, PR, and VI.
EPA administers the RCRA program in the following states/territories: AK, IA, and VI

1 Metric 3A data are pulled manually, and are updated annually at the end of each fiscal year. Metric 3A data is not available for FY04.

Jump to main content.