| Metric |
Metric Type |
Agency |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Graph |
| 1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete. |
| A | Number of operating TSDFs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | n/a |
| Number of active LQGs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 129 | 129 | 129 | 129 | 129 | 129 | 129 | n/a |
| Number of active SQGs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 577 | 577 | 577 | 577 | 577 | 577 | 577 | n/a |
| Number of all other active sites in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 2,033 | 2,033 | 2,033 | 2,033 | 2,033 | 2,033 | 2,033 | n/a |
| Number of LQGs per latest official biennial report (current) | Data Quality | State | 143 | 143 | 132 | 132 | 0 | 0 | 165 | n/a |
| B | Compliance monitoring: number of inspections (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 125 | 128 | 111 | 125 | 167 | 264 | 258 |  |
| EPA | 9 | 9 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 12 | 7 | |
| Compliance monitoring: sites inspected (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 116 | 120 | 104 | 122 | 163 | 260 | 252 | |
| EPA | 7 | 6 | 11 | 10 | 8 | 12 | 7 | |
| C | Number of sites with violations determined at any time (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 73 | 62 | 76 | 92 | 94 | 137 | 104 | |
| EPA | 11 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |
| Number of sites with violations determined during the FY | Data Quality | State | 58 | 54 | 65 | 73 | 79 | 119 | 83 | |
| EPA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| D | Informal actions: number of sites (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 58 | 43 | 55 | 58 | 65 | 87 | 58 | |
| EPA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Informal actions: number of actions (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 60 | 44 | 56 | 59 | 66 | 87 | 60 | |
| EPA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| E | SNC: number of sites with new SNC (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | |
| EPA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| SNC: Number of sites in SNC (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 4 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | |
| EPA | 8 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| F | Formal action: number of sites (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 6 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 5 | |
| EPA | 10 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Formal action: number taken (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 6 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 6 | |
| EPA | 10 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| G | Total amount of final penalties (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | $16,480 | $0 | $3,225 | $86,403 | $0 | $198,556 | $124,148 | |
| EPA | $41,260 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
| 2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate. |
| A | Number of sites SNC-determined on day of formal action (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Number of sites SNC-determined within one week of formal action (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| B | Number of sites in violation for greater than 240 days (current) | Data Quality | State | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | n/a |
| EPA | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | n/a |
| 3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete. |
| A | Percent SNCs entered ≥ 60 days after designation (1 FY) 1 | Review Indicator | State | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 25.0% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 60.0% | 100.0% | |
| EPA | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations. |
| A | Inspection coverage for operating TSDFs (2 FYs) | Goal | State | 92.3% | 76.9% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 84.6% | 92.3% | 84.6% | |
| Combined | 92.3% | 76.9% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 84.6% | 92.3% | 84.6% | |
| B | Inspection coverage for LQGs (1 FY) | Goal | State | 11.2% | 11.9% | 27.3% | 40.2% | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 21.8% | |
| Combined | 11.9% | 11.9% | 28.0% | 40.2% | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 21.8% | |
| C | Inspection coverage for LQGs (5 FYs) | Goal | State | 49.0% | 51.7% | 57.6% | 76.5% | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 67.9% | |
| Combined | 53.1% | 53.8% | 59.8% | 78.0% | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 69.1% | |
| D | Inspection coverage for active SQGs (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 15.9% | 20.1% | 22.7% | 25.3% | 28.9% | 35.4% | 40.0% | |
| Combined | 16.3% | 20.5% | 23.1% | 25.5% | 28.9% | 35.4% | 40.0% | |
| E | Inspections at active CESQGs (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 218 | 244 | 234 | 226 | 213 | 275 | 320 | |
| Combined | 225 | 252 | 242 | 231 | 218 | 281 | 326 | |
| Inspections at active transporters (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 112 | 63 | 39 | 40 | 36 | 38 | 45 | |
| Combined | 116 | 66 | 42 | 43 | 40 | 41 | 49 | |
| Inspections at non-notifiers (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
| Combined | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
| Inspections at active sites other than those listed in 5a-d and 5e1-5e3 (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 15 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 8 | 13 | |
| Combined | 16 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 8 | 13 | |
| 7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information. |
| C | Violation identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 50.0% | 45.0% | 62.5% | 59.8% | 48.5% | 45.8% | 32.9% | |
| EPA | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.3% | 14.3% | |
| 8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner. |
| A | SNC identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 1.7% | 1.7% | 2.9% | 0.8% | 2.5% | 1.5% | 0.0% | |
| Combined | 1.7% | 1.6% | 2.8% | 0.8% | 2.4% | 1.5% | 0.0% | |
| B | Percent of SNC determinations made within 150 days (1 FY) | Goal | State | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | |
| EPA | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| C | Percent of formal actions taken that received a prior SNC listing (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 42.9% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 90.9% | 71.4% | |
| EPA | 80.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 10. Timely and appropriate action. degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media. |
| A | Percent of SNCs with formal action/referral taken within 360 days (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 50.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 25.0% | 75.0% | 0 / 0 | |
| Combined | 50.0% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 25.0% | 75.0% | 0 / 0 | |
| B | No activity indicator - number of formal actions (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 6 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 6 | |
| 12. Final penalty assessment and collection. degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected. |
| A | No activity indicator - penalties (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | $16,480 | $0 | $3,225 | $86,403 | $0 | $198,556 | $124,148 | |
| B | Percent of final formal actions with penalty (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 80.0% | 0 / 0 | 50.0% | 75.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
| Combined | 75.0% | 0 / 0 | 50.0% | 75.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 80.0% | |
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}