| Metric |
Metric Type |
Agency |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Graph |
| 1. Data completeness. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete. |
| A | Number of operating TSDFs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | n/a |
| Number of active LQGs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 260 | 260 | 260 | 260 | 260 | 260 | 260 | n/a |
| Number of active SQGs in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 667 | 667 | 667 | 667 | 667 | 667 | 667 | n/a |
| Number of all other active sites in RCRAInfo (current) | Data Quality | State | 2,995 | 2,995 | 2,995 | 2,995 | 2,995 | 2,995 | 2,995 | n/a |
| Number of LQGs per latest official biennial report (current) | Data Quality | State | 278 | 278 | 251 | 251 | 252 | 252 | 230 | n/a |
| B | Compliance monitoring: number of inspections (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 262 | 228 | 232 | 268 | 385 | 258 | 145 |  |
| EPA | 15 | 18 | 24 | 18 | 14 | 29 | 27 | |
| Compliance monitoring: sites inspected (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 202 | 178 | 172 | 190 | 275 | 190 | 111 | |
| EPA | 15 | 18 | 24 | 18 | 14 | 29 | 22 | |
| C | Number of sites with violations determined at any time (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 123 | 117 | 109 | 139 | 199 | 159 | 102 | |
| EPA | 12 | 14 | 11 | 7 | 10 | 20 | 10 | |
| Number of sites with violations determined during the FY | Data Quality | State | 92 | 93 | 92 | 113 | 157 | 113 | 66 | |
| EPA | 11 | 13 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 15 | 5 | |
| D | Informal actions: number of sites (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 97 | 84 | 78 | 96 | 164 | 121 | 71 | |
| EPA | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Informal actions: number of actions (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 107 | 91 | 92 | 108 | 213 | 168 | 99 | |
| EPA | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| E | SNC: number of sites with new SNC (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 16 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 22 | 25 | 12 | |
| EPA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| SNC: Number of sites in SNC (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 26 | 22 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 39 | 24 | |
| EPA | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| F | Formal action: number of sites (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 16 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 15 | 32 | 22 | |
| EPA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Formal action: number taken (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 16 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 15 | 32 | 29 | |
| EPA | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
| G | Total amount of final penalties (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | $181,200 | $214,850 | $44,000 | $131,785 | $181,620 | $305,916 | $578,207 | |
| EPA | $1,500 | $31,195 | $0 | $0 | $22,000 | $0 | $0 | |
| 2. Data accuracy. degree to which the minimum data requirements are accurate. |
| A | Number of sites SNC-determined on day of formal action (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Number of sites SNC-determined within one week of formal action (1 FY) | Data Quality | State | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| B | Number of sites in violation for greater than 240 days (current) | Data Quality | State | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | n/a |
| EPA | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | n/a |
| 3. Timeliness of data entry. degree to which the minimum data requirements are complete. |
| A | Percent SNCs entered ≥ 60 days after designation (1 FY) 1 | Review Indicator | State | 0 / 0 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 33.3% | 39.1% | 31.6% | 23.1% | |
| EPA | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | 0 / 0 | |
| 5. Inspection coverage. degree to which state completed the universe of planned inspections/compliance evaluations. |
| A | Inspection coverage for operating TSDFs (2 FYs) | Goal | State | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| Combined | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | |
| B | Inspection coverage for LQGs (1 FY) | Goal | State | 24.5% | 25.5% | 32.7% | 34.3% | 41.7% | 31.0% | 31.3% | |
| Combined | 24.5% | 25.5% | 32.7% | 34.3% | 41.7% | 31.0% | 31.7% | |
| C | Inspection coverage for LQGs (5 FYs) | Goal | State | 76.6% | 81.7% | 83.3% | 79.3% | 86.1% | 93.7% | 94.3% | |
| Combined | 77.0% | 82.0% | 83.3% | 79.3% | 86.1% | 93.7% | 94.8% | |
| D | Inspection coverage for active SQGs (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 27.4% | 26.4% | 24.4% | 21.0% | 22.6% | 24.7% | 21.7% | |
| Combined | 27.6% | 26.4% | 24.4% | 21.0% | 22.6% | 24.7% | 21.9% | |
| E | Inspections at active CESQGs (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 669 | 551 | 421 | 288 | 287 | 261 | 226 | |
| Combined | 682 | 562 | 435 | 300 | 299 | 276 | 243 | |
| Inspections at active transporters (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 28 | 25 | 27 | 25 | 28 | 28 | 30 | |
| Combined | 28 | 25 | 28 | 28 | 32 | 34 | 38 | |
| Inspections at non-notifiers (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Combined | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Inspections at active sites other than those listed in 5a-d and 5e1-5e3 (5 FYs) | Informational Only | State | 38 | 41 | 40 | 38 | 32 | 29 | 25 | |
| Combined | 39 | 41 | 40 | 38 | 32 | 29 | 25 | |
| 7. Identification of alleged violations. degree to which compliance determinations are accurately made and promptly reported in the national database based upon compliance monitoring report observations and other compliance monitoring information. |
| C | Violation identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 45.5% | 52.2% | 53.5% | 59.5% | 57.1% | 59.5% | 59.5% | |
| EPA | 73.3% | 72.2% | 33.3% | 22.2% | 64.3% | 51.7% | 22.7% | |
| 8. Identification of SNC and HPV. degree to which the state accurately identifies significant noncompliance & high priority violations and enters information into the national system in a timely manner. |
| A | SNC identification rate at sites with inspections (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 7.9% | 5.6% | 5.2% | 3.7% | 8.0% | 13.2% | 10.8% | |
| Combined | 7.9% | 5.6% | 5.2% | 3.7% | 8.0% | 13.6% | 10.3% | |
| B | Percent of SNC determinations made within 150 days (1 FY) | Goal | State | 100.0% | 100.0% | 87.5% | 14.3% | 45.5% | 60.0% | 30.8% | |
| EPA | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 100.0% | 0 / 0 | 0.0% | 50.0% | 0 / 0 | |
| C | Percent of formal actions taken that received a prior SNC listing (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 70.6% | 77.3% | 31.0% | 40.0% | 52.8% | 67.1% | 73.6% | |
| EPA | 45.5% | 0.0% | 75.0% | 0.0% | 16.7% | 37.5% | 100.0% | |
| 10. Timely and appropriate action. degree to which a state takes timely and appropriate enforcement actions in accordance with policy relating to specific media. |
| A | Percent of SNCs with formal action/referral taken within 360 days (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 0.0% | 0.0% | 11.1% | 0.0% | 13.6% | 48.0% | 25.0% | |
| Combined | 0.0% | 0.0% | 22.2% | 0.0% | 13.6% | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
| B | No activity indicator - number of formal actions (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 16 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 15 | 32 | 27 | |
| 12. Final penalty assessment and collection. degree to which differences between initial and final penalty are documented in the file along with a demonstration in the file that the final penalty was collected. |
| A | No activity indicator - penalties (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | $181,200 | $214,850 | $44,000 | $131,785 | $181,620 | $305,916 | $578,207 | |
| B | Percent of final formal actions with penalty (1 FY) | Review Indicator | State | 86.7% | 81.2% | 50.0% | 90.9% | 100.0% | 90.3% | 89.5% | |
| Combined | 87.5% | 82.4% | 42.9% | 90.9% | 100.0% | 87.5% | 85.0% | |
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}